Best player born from 1970-2000

lud

Hall of Fame
'70 - Agassi
'71 - Sampras
'72 - Rafter
'73 - Rusedski
'74 - Kafelnikov
'75 - Rios
'76 - Kuerten
'77 - Canas
'78 - Haas
'79 - Ljubicic
'80 - Safin
'81 - Federer
'82 - Roddick
'83 - Verdasco
'84 - Soderling
'85 - Wawrinka
'86 - Nadal
'87 - Djokovic
'88 - Del Potro
'89 - Nishikori
'90 - Raonic
'91 - Dimitrov
'92 - Sock
'93 - Thiem
'94 - Pouille
'95 - Kyrgios
'96 - Coric
'97 - A.Zverev
'98 - Tsitsipas
'99 - Shapovalov
'00 - Auger-Aliassime

Do you agree?
79 Blake
78 Karlovic
82 Ferrer,Nalbandian
76 Moya
96 Khachanov
91 Raonic
88 Cilic
83 Muller
are all hon. mentions
 
Last edited:
'70 - Agassi
'71 - Sampras
'72 - Rafter
'73 - Rusedski
'74 - Kafelnikov
'75 - Rios
'76 - Kuerten
'77 - Canas
'78 - Haas
'79 - Ljubicic
'80 - Safin
'81 - Federer
'82 - Roddick
'83 - Verdasco
'84 - Soderling
'85 - Wawrinka
'86 - Nadal
'87 - Djokovic
'88 - Del Potro
'89 - Nishikori
'90 - Goffin
'91 - Dimitrov
'92 - Sock
'93 - Thiem
'94 - Pouille
'95 - Kyrgios
'96 - Coric
'97 - A.Zverev
'98 - Tsitsipas
'99 - Shapovalov
'00 - Auger-Aliassime

Do you agree?
79 Blake
78 Karlovic
82 Ferrer,Nalbandian
76 Moya
96 Khachanov
91 Raonic
88 Cilic
83 Muller
are all hon. mentions
MURY not an honourable mention??
Ban Thread. Delete OP(oster).
Joe King.
 
'70 - Agassi
'71 - Sampras
'72 - Rafter
'73 - Rusedski
'74 - Kafelnikov
'75 - Rios
'76 - Kuerten
'77 - Canas
'78 - Haas
'79 - Ljubicic
'80 - Safin
'81 - Federer
'82 - Roddick
'83 - Verdasco
'84 - Soderling
'85 - Wawrinka
'86 - Nadal
'87 - Djokovic
'88 - Del Potro
'89 - Nishikori
'90 - Goffin
'91 - Dimitrov
'92 - Sock
'93 - Thiem
'94 - Pouille
'95 - Kyrgios
'96 - Coric
'97 - A.Zverev
'98 - Tsitsipas
'99 - Shapovalov
'00 - Auger-Aliassime
1990 - Raonic
 
Ugh...isn't there really anybody better than Sock for '92?? Yikes...:sick::sick:
There's Diego Schwartzman.

There' s also the GOAT
dcdc506292f939a580086c2fbe4e2c28
 
You're insane.

Kafelnikov, Rios and Kuerten played incredible tennis.

Mid-late 90s to early 00s was amazing, so many different styles/players/surfaces.
3 consecutive years bearing the fruit of Cañas Haas Lube is not my idea of incredible tennis.

All 3 of those guys you listed were great - when they were great. Each also had close to the worst longevity of any Slam winner/world #1 and were completely cooked and irrelevant before age 30, or even 27.
 
3 consecutive years bearing the fruit of Cañas Haas Lube is not my idea of incredible tennis.

All 3 of those guys you listed were great - when they were great. Each also had close to the worst longevity of any Slam winner/world #1 and were completely cooked and irrelevant before age 30, or even 27.

They are legendary players and not irrelevant in any way. Here we are over 20 years later still talking about them and many many people still appreciate their tennis.

Also, they played in an era before homogenization of courts so longevity and dominance by one player was much more difficult.
 
Back
Top