Best Roger Interview in a long time...

N

nikdom

Guest
This is the best (most candid and with new info) interview from Roger Federer in a long time. Enjoy!

http://www.gototennisblog.com/2010/01/15/roger-federer-on-unpleasant-questions-bullsht-and-tiger-woods/

Highlights for those who can't bother to click -

- Roger is motivated to win more titles in 2010 and his top priority is to keep his No.1 ranking this year.

- The pressure of winning R.G and overcoming Sampras is gone but Roger motivates himself by reminding himself of his H2H records and such.

- It is true! Roger does not care about Master's 1000 tournaments. (Proof for those who denied that Roger does not care much about master's tournaments and that he's really in decline)

- Roger stands up for Rafa! Says its "bull$hit" if anyone says Rafa's best days are behind him. Expects Rafa's peak form to return and defends Rafa's loss in Doha.
(For all you Rafa fans that trash Roger every opportunity you get, you should learn a thing or two from the champ. Those two guys have genuine respect for each other)

- Talks about other players and the previous generation

- Roger offered his support to Tiger Woods and says the entire scandal has been hard on Tiger and his family.
 

Bashi

Rookie
was this interview in english or translated? i just thought it was funny to see him say "bull$hit," haha idk just weird coming from federer
 

Lotto

Professional
The Whole interview seems super weird coming from Federer....is it definitely real because I've never read an interview like this from him before...
 
N

nikdom

Guest
was this interview in english or translated? i just thought it was funny to see him say "bull$hit," haha idk just weird coming from federer

This interview appeared in print only in a French newspaper. Translated by a French reader of the GTT blog. The same interview is being referenced in AP reports about Roger having spoken with Tiger.

(Apparently Roger used the word 'conneries' in French, meaning 'bulls...' in English)
 

sdont

Legend
was this interview in english or translated? i just thought it was funny to see him say "bull$hit," haha idk just weird coming from federer

The interview was in French I think, since it was for a French newspaper and Fed usually does his interviews in French for the French media.
 
N

nikdom

Guest
^^ sdont can you confirm 'conneries' for us if you speak French (assuming you do since you live in Paris) :)
 
N

nikdom

Guest
The Whole interview seems super weird coming from Federer....is it definitely real because I've never read an interview like this from him before...

Why is it weird? I thought his answers were sensible, straight forward and more illuminating than usual. (I guess he was in a happy and forthcoming mood).
 

sdont

Legend
^^ sdont can you confirm 'conneries' for us if you speak French (assuming you do since you live in Paris) :)

Well I can confirm that the French word "conneries" means ********, and I've already heard Fed use it if I'm not mistaken.
 
N

nikdom

Guest
To me the most promising part (and the secret hope I had for years), is that Roger may revert to a more S&V style at some point. I think that will be awesome and Roger can have a second life at the top. Imagine getting back a S&V giant in the game after almost a decade or more of baseline dominance.

It should also make Roger's game easier on his body. Very sensible and long term thinking. Kudos Rodge. I hope to see you as a top player for many more years to come.
 
N

nikdom

Guest
^^ and with that wish I complete 1000 posts. :)

I hope its a good sign for Roger's career!
 
T

TheMagicianOfPrecision

Guest
This is the best (most candid and with new info) interview from Roger Federer in a long time. Enjoy!

http://www.gototennisblog.com/2010/01/15/roger-federer-on-unpleasant-questions-bullsht-and-tiger-woods/

Highlights for those who can't bother to click -

- Roger is motivated to win more titles in 2010 and his top priority is to keep his No.1 ranking this year.

- The pressure of winning R.G and overcoming Sampras is gone but Roger motivates himself by reminding himself of his H2H records and such.

- It is true! Roger does not care about Master's 1000 tournaments. (Proof for those who denied that Roger does not care much about master's tournaments and that he's really in decline)

- Roger stands up for Rafa! Says its "bull$hit" if anyone says Rafa's best days are behind him. Expects Rafa's peak form to return and defends Rafa's loss in Doha.
(For all you Rafa fans that trash Roger every opportunity you get, you should learn a thing or two from the champ. Those two guys have genuine respect for each other)

- Talks about other players and the previous generation

- Roger offered his support to Tiger Woods and says the entire scandal has been hard on Tiger and his family.

Thanx a lot for posting, very good interwiew, and not an ordinary one at all!
 

Ledigs

Legend
Do you think this is real? I can't believe he is so candid. And all the little vague references to Nadal (you know who)?
 

malakas

Banned
Do you think this is real? I can't believe he is so candid. And all the little vague references to Nadal (you know who)?

It is a very nice,but also...suspiciously strange interview.Somehow the way he talks doesn't sound like him..it's too..fake and constructed hmmm:?

But anyway very nice interview!
 

mandy01

G.O.A.T.
Its a real interview given to L'Equipe.
Re:Nadal-Yes,he did use the word 'conneries' when asked if Nadal's best was behind him.He said that the question reminded him of what he was put through last year and before that by the media and he said he thinks Rafa's best is yet to come.

Roger didnt say he dosent care about the Masters events but that he isnt so determined to break the record as the series have only existed for the last 20 or so years.

Roger was also asked about DC and what he thought of those calling him selfish etc.-He answered the same way some of us have been doing in the forum :lol:

Re:Tiger-He said he spoke to Tiger and that its he knows how hard it can be when all the image you build around yourself comes crashing down in one moment.He said it must be tough for Tiger and his family.

re:Motivation-Again-Its the love he has for the sport and the the remaining records ( including the H2H) that keep him motivated.
Also says he'll be doing exhos in South America after 2012 since he's never been there
:wink:
 
N

nikdom

Guest
It is a very nice,but also...suspiciously strange interview.Somehow the way he talks doesn't sound like him..it's too..fake and constructed hmmm:?

But anyway very nice interview!

Its a translation from an interview originally in French. Plus, if you read the article, the interview was spontaneous - the interviewer requested an interview as Roger was leaving for his hotel and Roger accepted and asked him to hop in the car. I think that's a good setting for a forthright interview. Btw I still don't understand what seems fake to you guys!!?
 
N

nikdom

Guest
Its a real interview given to L'Equipe.
Re:Nadal-Yes,he did use the word 'conneries' when asked if Nadal's best was behind him.He said that the question reminded him of what he was put through last year and before that by the media and he said he thinks Rafa's best is yet to come.

Roger didnt say he dosent care about the Masters events but that he isnt so determined to break the record as the series have only existed for the last 20 or so years.

Roger was also asked about DC and what he thought of those calling him selfish etc.-He answered the same way some of us have been doing in the fourm :lol:

Re:Tiger-He said he spoke to Tiger and that its he knows how hardi t can be when all the image you build around yourself comes crashing down in one moment.He said it must be tough for Tiger and his family.

re:Motivation-Again-Its the love he has for the sport and the the remianing records ( including the H2H) that keep him motivated.
Also says he'll be doing exhos in South America after 2012 since he's never been there
:wink:

Obviously, "doesn't care" is a relative term for "doesn't value as much as". That's what he says there basically. He's not motivated to break Agassi's 17 master's shield record. That means he's not going at a MS tournament with the same degree of passion as at a GS tournament.
 

mandy01

G.O.A.T.
Obviously, "doesn't care" is a relative term for "doesn't value as much as". That's what he says there basically. He's not motivated to break Agassi's 17 master's shield record. That means he's not going at a MS tournament with the same degree of passion as at a GS tournament.
I know that.I just espressed your point differently and in a way that came closer to what he actually said.:wink:
 
N

nikdom

Guest
I know that.I just espressed your point differently and in a way that came closer to what he actually said.:wink:

Thank you for looking out for other readers. I'm sure I did not do a great job of conveying Roger's thoughts. Glad you were able to clarify.
 

mandy01

G.O.A.T.
Thank you for looking out for other readers. I'm sure I did not do a great job of conveying Roger's thoughts. Glad you were able to clarify.
I dont see where I implied that.I 'reported' what he said in short while you 'conveyed Roger's thoughts' a little different to the actual wordings.
 

malakas

Banned
Its a translation from an interview originally in French. Plus, if you read the article, the interview was spontaneous - the interviewer requested an interview as Roger was leaving for his hotel and Roger accepted and asked him to hop in the car. I think that's a good setting for a forthright interview. Btw I still don't understand what seems fake to you guys!!?

the way Fed's words are phrased,but maybe it's the translation or smth.But if it's posted in L'equipe I trust it.
 

sdont

Legend
Too bad I didn't think of picking L'Equipe today. And I'm just too lazy to search for a newspapers stand still open this late (I'm sure there is somewhere in Paris).
 

mandy01

G.O.A.T.
Here's the whole interview-thanks to an RF.commer ,for those interested.

Tuesday January 5th, 21h30, Roger Federer is chatting on the backseat of the car that drives him back from the stadium to the Ritz-Carlton hotel in Doha. The interview has been suggested to him unexpectedly and he said : “No problem, just get in the car”. When this kind of things happen, you don’t ask the driver if he’s got his driving license; you just jump in the car. Here we go. Federer is beginning his 12th year on the tour. But this one is different: ‘It’s the 2nd half-time of my career’ he says. Grand Slam titles record? Done. Roland-Garros? Done. So what’s left?

Q: For the first time since a long time, you start the season not having to answer those 2 questions: ‘Are you going to break Sampras’ record any time soon?’ and ‘Are you finally going to win Roland-Garros?’ Do you miss them?
RF: (he laughs) Now I’m done with unpleasant questions! Frankly, it’s relaxing. A year ago, I was no2 in the world, I was about to lose the final in Melbourne and people were relentlessly questionning me.

Q: Now that you’ve won at least once each of the Grand Slams, now that you hold the Grand Slams titles record, don’t you feel a sense of emptiness?
RF: It’s the end of a period. Within one month last year, between RG and Wimbledon, I reached those 2 great goals. I think it changed my life, but I never felt ‘empty’ afterwards. I’ve never woken up one morning asking myself: ‘What do I do now?’ We’re lucky because tennis is a very dense sport. There’s the rankings, Grand Slams, Masters 1000, head-to-heads… Sometimes I motivate myself jsut by thinking about the history I have with one player. [Murray at the end of last year? LOL]

Q: You haven’t felt the need to think about what happens next, about your goals?

RF: No. The desire to play comes naturally. What I often do is that I go back to the beginning: why did I chose tennis as a kid? why did I work so hard during all those years? what do I like so much when I play tennis? And the answers come easily. It’s simple: I don’t really think there is someone who loves tennis more than I do.

Q: But don’t you feel like a burden has disappeared?
RF: Yes and no. Personally I think the pressure is always there, and it’s a good thing. It’s a different pressure, but it has not disappeared. Anyway, if one day ther’s nobody to put pressure on me anymore, I’ll still be there to put it on myself. I don’t even remember having played a match without feeling any pressure.

Q: You like challenges [they do not mean Hawk-Eye :p ], so here are some. Tell us if you’re motivated by them.
RF: OK, here we go.

Q: You need 2 more Mesters 1000 to beat Agassi’s record of 17.
RF: Mmmmmh. I’m not really excited by that. Masters 1000 have been existing only for 20 years, and I don’t know how many of them great players from the past could have won. So this record does not mean much.

Q: Another challenge. If you stay world no1 after RG, you’ll beat Sampras’ all-time record of 286 weeks.
RF: This, is an important record to me. When I beat Connors’ record (consecutive weeks as world no1) I already thought it was really great. Staying in the front that long when you know who is behind you, it’s not easy. By the way, my main goal this year is to finish the year no1 in the world. It has been so hard to get that ranking back.

Q: So you want to stay no1. What else?
RF: To win more tournaments. Last year, I won 4 of them. They were big ones, but I have to be able to do better. I lacked titles in smaller tournaments. True, I had to withdraw several times, because of an injury or because I needed some rest (Dubai, Halle, Tokyo). So I focused entirely on big tournaments, and I don’t really like it. Before I withdraw from Tokyo last year, I had told Seve (Luthi): ‘I’m going there to serve-and-volley on 1st and 2nd serves’. Because I thought it could help me later.

Q: Speaking of later, when do you think you’ll end your career?
RF: To calm down everybody, I said I’ll play until the 2012 Olympic Games in London. But it’s a minimum. I don’t think I’ll stop there. I see myself playing after, but differently. I’ll try to play some new tournaments, to do some exhibitions in South America, where I’ve nearly never been to.

Q: You’re in the top10 since you’ve entered it in October, 2002. Do you think today’s top10 is stronger than back in 2002, with Safin, Hewitt, Novak, Henman, Grosjean, Ferrero?
RF: Tough suestion. I’m not so sure. Nowadays, the guys have less weaknesses but maybe also less main strengths. Before, players were more suprising, with more varied games. It was harder to dominate on a specific surface. Nowadays playing conditions are been standardized and the payers as well. Often, when I watch players like Davydenko, Del Potro or Djokovic, I wonder what their best shot is…

Q: If you had to chose one player that is going to reach a new milestone in 2010, who would it be?
RF: If I had to chose only one, it would be Murray. He has built himself cleverly, he won a lot of Masters 1000, he already has a lot of experience. That being said, Del Potro never won a Masters 1000 but still won the US Open. A year ago, I would never have said predicted that. He was not really using the strength of his serve, unlike now. He’s improved so much.

Q: And what about the winner of the World Tour Finals, who just beat you 2 times in a row?
RF: Oh, Davydenko! I can tell you I’m going to follow him very closely in Melbourne. The Australien Open is going to show us if he can keep up with this rythm, and if he can beat us in best-of-five matches. This is so much interesting!

Q: Monfils, Tsonga, Simon, Gasquet, you’re interested?
RF: A lot. We all know they have a big potential. Let’s say they confirmed it last year. Now, they need to make a breakthrough and therefore to be less injured. Richard is going to go up quite fast. The big question is how far?

Q: Nadal has not won a tournament since Rome last year, in May. Some think he’ll never be what he once were.
RF: This is ******** ['conneries' in French]. It reminds me what people said about me last year. I’ve seen Rafa play in Abu Dhabi and in Doha: he lacks absolutely nothing. Granted, he’s not won in a long time. But look at those who beat him: Del Potro, Murray, Davydenko, Djokovic, Soderling… They’re not bad! Think about it: had he played Wimbledon last year and not lost 2,000 points from his victory in 2008, where would he be right now? He came back from injury, so it’s normal that he lacked confidence. But to me, the really great Rafa is still to come.

Q: You never had any serious injuries. The Australian Open is your 41th GS tournament in a row. Is it hard work or luck?
RF: Both. I’m expecting myself to be fit in big tournaments. You cannot just come at Grand Slams with a small injury. Ladies can handle the 3 first rounds while healing, men just can’t. My style of play helps me to last longer. Most of the time, I decide how the point is played, I make the other one run. When Rafa takes 45 minutes to win a set, I can take 30. I worked really hard when I was a junior to build myself an efficient armour. Now, I work less hard, but more precisely.

Q: You’re 28 and you can’t recover as fast as before. Is it why you hired Stephane Vivier, a French physio?
RF: He’s from Marseille on top of that! (he laughs) It’s true that your age matters. Until this season, I always had masseurs, and I wanted to work with a physio. He had worked a long time with the ATP and I didn’t want people to think that I was stealing him, like ‘Sorry guys, but I’m Federer. Now he’s mine’. I think everybody took it well.

Q: What do you mean by ‘working more precisely’?
RF: When you’re young, you don’t warm up. You play on your PlayStation and when you’re called to play the match, you leave. Now, I consistently take a 10-minutes muscle warm-up right before the match. I strengthen my back nearly everyday because I’ve had problems in the past. I’ve always felt my back wasn’t strong enough.

Q: And what about your sleep? Word is that you sleep like a log.
RF: True! If I don’t sleep 11 or 12 hours a day, it’s not right. If I don’t have that amount of sleep, I hurt myself. When the twins cry and that I’m in a tournament, I put my earplugs and I go back to sleep.

Q: You withdrew from the Davis Cup 1st round. Is it because it’s against Spain, in Spain, and on clay?
RF: Not because it’s Spain. Just because it’s on clay. Between Dubai and Indian Wells, it just doesn’t fit. It saddens me, but I know why I took that decision.

Q: Some said it was self-centred and unpatriotic. People thought that after having beaten Sampras’ record you would be able to play the Davis Cup…
RF: People have to understand that it’s just not possible to do everything. Had I made another choice, maybe I wouldn’t have wom RG last year. Do people prefer me to play the Davis Cup or to hold the GS record? Don’t Swiss people prefer having me as the world no1? If I play it and then it costs me in the rankings, people will always be there to tell me: ‘Ho, hum, you’re not no1 anymore!’

Q: Is it really impossible to do both?
RF: I consider that a Davis Cup round amounts to take out one Masters 1000. And I’m not ready to do that. I still favour my individual choices; time will come when this changes. You also have to understand that I do not have a team as abundant as Rafa’s with Spain. I’m not complaining. It’s just a fact. Rafa hasn’t played the quarterfinals and the semifinals last year. But people saw him as the star in the finals. They just forgot he wasn’t there before.
 

mandy01

G.O.A.T.
The question re ;Tiger


Q: Have you spoken to Tiger Woods since his problems were revealed?
RF: Yes, he is my friend and I told him I was there to support him. It’s really tough for him and his family to see their intimate problems flaunted everywhere.

Q: Have you learned something from the magnitude of this story?

This is instructive. The tabloids are going crazy, sponsor contracts are falling apart… I’ve always been aware that the image you patiently construct for an entire career can be ruined in a minute. It scares you a bit, but that’s the way things are. Tiger needs calm. And soon he’ll become the wonderful golfer that we know again.
 

David L

Hall of Fame
- It is true! Roger does not care about Master's 1000 tournaments. (Proof for those who denied that Roger does not care much about master's tournaments and that he's really in decline)

No, he said he does not believe the Masters Series record is particularly significant or important, because the events have only existed for 20 or so years. That does not mean he does not want to win more or does not care about them, just that the record is nothing to get excited about from an academic perspective. He does say he would like to win more tournaments than just the big events, so he clearly does care about these events, as well as 500 and 250 events, just not as much as the Slams.
 
N

nikdom

Guest
No, he said he does not believe the Masters Series record is particularly significant or important, because the events have only existed for 20 or so years. That does not mean he does not want to win more or does not care about them, just that the record is nothing to get excited about from an academic perspective. He does say he would like to win more tournaments than just the big events, so he clearly does care about these events, as well as 500 and 250 events, just not as much as the Slams.

Yes. The point has already been made. Welcome to the thread.
 

Badger

Semi-Pro
Thanks a million OP! Really good interview. I even found myself laughing sometimes which doesn't happen all that often when reading or listening to a Fed interview. Gives Fed fans some confidence going into the Aussie.
 

joeri888

G.O.A.T.
Good interview. Finally, for once.

I really liked the fact that he was planning on serving and volleying in Tokyo on first AND second serve. He needs that. Fed's also got some nice backups for both Murray and Nadal.
 
Last edited:
N

nikdom

Guest
Good interview. Finally, for once.

I really liked the fact that he was planning on serving and volleying in Tokyo on first AND second serve. He needs that. Fed's also got some nice backups for both Murray and Nadal.

Yeah Rodge had good things to say about both. I think some of what he says in press conferences at the tournaments iis more for mind-games (especially against Murray in the recent past)

Off court, I think he understands realistically where everyone is with their games. Any champion has to know that otherwise they're in danger of underestimating opponents.
 

Sartorius

Hall of Fame
Great interview. This part hit me:

Nowadays, the guys have less weaknesses but maybe also less main strengths. Before, players were more surprising, with more varied games. It was harder to dominate on a specific surface. Nowadays playing conditions are been standardized and the players as well. Often, when I watch players like Davydenko, Del Potro or Djokovic, I wonder what their best shot is…

It feels like a spot-on observation...

He sleeps 11-12 hours a day!!!??? Does anyone know other pros or athletes who sleep that much?

If I'm not mistaken, Pete Sampras used to do so.
 
Last edited:

malakas

Banned
If I'm not mistaken, Pete Sampras used to do so.

yes.From a physiology standpoint goats require a lot of hours to sleep.

[hmmm..interestingly enough,when I googled goat sleep hours, I found instructions how to teach your goat to bow and how this can cure your insomnia!:)]
 

joeri888

G.O.A.T.
Yeah Rodge had good things to say about both. I think some of what he says in press conferences at the tournaments iis more for mind-games (especially against Murray in the recent past)

Off court, I think he understands realistically where everyone is with their games. Any champion has to know that otherwise they're in danger of underestimating opponents.

I think Roger hasn't said anything close to being a mindgame since winning Wimbledon. Maybe he felt he had to talk confidence to still believe himself he could win.. Or something like that. Anyway, I really liked this interview.

The part quoted by Sartorius is indeed spot-on. Hewitt was a runner and a fighter, Nalbandian was a backhand, Roddick was a serve, Ferrero was a forehand. I think it made the tour really interesting and there was more variety. Del Potro, Djokovic and Davydenko are all players that are strong off both wings, have good footwork and a decent serve, but not any weapon in particular. Federer, Murray, nadal and Roddick have more obvious weapons.
 

LiveForever

Banned
This is an amazing interview. I forgot how cool Roger was.

Although Tiger Woods is a total scumbag. He deserves to lose all of his endorsements. I understand Federer's sugarcoated response pertaining to tiger woods as they are good friend.
 
Last edited:

LiveForever

Banned
yes.From a physiology standpoint goats require a lot of hours to sleep.

[hmmm..interestingly enough,when I googled goat sleep hours, I found instructions how to teach your goat to bow and how this can cure your insomnia!:)]
ROFL!!!!! That is hilarious, Malakas.
 

Emelia21

Rookie
The question re ;Tiger


Q: Have you spoken to Tiger Woods since his problems were revealed?
RF: Yes, he is my friend and I told him I was there to support him. It’s really tough for him and his family to see their intimate problems flaunted everywhere.

Q: Have you learned something from the magnitude of this story?

This is instructive. The tabloids are going crazy, sponsor contracts are falling apart… I’ve always been aware that the image you patiently construct for an entire career can be ruined in a minute. It scares you a bit, but that’s the way things are. Tiger needs calm. And soon he’ll become the wonderful golfer that we know again.

Roger is supporting Tiger :shock: and not his wife :shock: :confused:
 

Moose Malloy

G.O.A.T.
Nowadays, the guys have less weaknesses but maybe also less main strengths. Before, players were more suprising, with more varied games. It was harder to dominate on a specific surface. Nowadays playing conditions are been standardized and the players as well.

huh, I've been saying this for years.
 

jackson vile

G.O.A.T.
This is the best (most candid and with new info) interview from Roger Federer in a long time. Enjoy!

http://www.gototennisblog.com/2010/01/15/roger-federer-on-unpleasant-questions-bullsht-and-tiger-woods/

Highlights for those who can't bother to click -

- Roger is motivated to win more titles in 2010 and his top priority is to keep his No.1 ranking this year.

- The pressure of winning R.G and overcoming Sampras is gone but Roger motivates himself by reminding himself of his H2H records and such.

- It is true! Roger does not care about Master's 1000 tournaments. (Proof for those who denied that Roger does not care much about master's tournaments and that he's really in decline)

- Roger stands up for Rafa! Says its "bull$hit" if anyone says Rafa's best days are behind him. Expects Rafa's peak form to return and defends Rafa's loss in Doha.
(For all you Rafa fans that trash Roger every opportunity you get, you should learn a thing or two from the champ. Those two guys have genuine respect for each other)

- Talks about other players and the previous generation

- Roger offered his support to Tiger Woods and says the entire scandal has been hard on Tiger and his family.


More proof that Roger's level of play has not changed it is #1 the field is stronger #2 his goals have changed.

In your face ****s!
 

TheMusicLover

G.O.A.T.
Great interview, thanks for the link/posting!

Roger has a lot of kind words for virtually 'everybody' in this interview. Rafa, Davydenko, Murray, even Woods. :p He comes across as a great collegue/friend indeed.

Q: Nadal has not won a tournament since Rome last year, in May. Some think he’ll never be what he once were.
RF: This is ******** ['conneries' in French]. It reminds me what people said about me last year. I’ve seen Rafa play in Abu Dhabi and in Doha: he lacks absolutely nothing. Granted, he’s not won in a long time. But look at those who beat him: Del Potro, Murray, Davydenko, Djokovic, Soderling… They’re not bad! Think about it: had he played Wimbledon last year and not lost 2,000 points from his victory in 2008, where would he be right now? He came back from injury, so it’s normal that he lacked confidence. But to me, the really great Rafa is still to come.

Fantastic to read this. I remember well how Rafa defended Roger in 2009, saying how "unfair" and even "cruel" the media treated Roger, declaring Roger's career being 'over' and the like. Apparently Roger is returning the compliment in this interview, backing up Rafa, by saying that he has all faith in his return at full power on the tour.
Great rivals and friends, these two. Hope they both make it to the final at the AO. :)
 
Top