Stewart Cohen said:
New Balance shoes are popular with podiatrists because orthotics fit in them. You may have to buy a half-size up, and a width out (i.e., from D to EE) but then you can use them.
Orthotics fit in many shoes, even in Nikes, which are in many cases narrower. I am able to switch my Spenco full support from Nikes to Wilson with no problems, even if I have a wide foot (EE to 2EE in terms of NB sizes).
I am not sure about the rigid orthotics, those might be more difficult to fit.
However, many companies are producing now shoes which are wider, even if they don't have sizes for them, as NB does. Wilson has generally a wider fit.
But you just have to take your orthotics to the store (and your socks, esp if wearing thick ones, such as Thorlos) and try until you're satisfied.
I am not sure how the NB 820s fit in terms of low to the ground, because the NB 800s certainly weren't so.
The Nike Oscillates, which cured my heel problems together with the Spenco orthotics, have good support, are low to the ground and are flexible. Practically impossible now to obtain in North America, but available from sites in Europe (clay models). It's plain stupid for Nike to have stopped their distribution here.
Do not forget to perform the shoe flexibility test given at the first link in my posting:
Great Fitness Sites
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=33800
at the Heel section
which is
http://www.drpribut.com/sports/heelhtm.htm
Also, in general, when I am looking at medical problems, I am not looking at the positive reports about a product, but at the negative ones.
Why should I care that 80% of the people do not have problems with say Luxilon strings or PD+ rackets when the rest of them do? That's indicative of a deficiency and I do not want to put my body at risk. No company would pay me for my insuing problems.