MichaelNadal
Bionic Poster
Capriati certainly deserves a mention
I thought it was implicit in the thread we were talking about the Open era? Mentioning her is like comparing Don Budge to Laver. It's like mentioning Renshaw as co-equal to Pete at Wimbledon since both have 7 titles.
That poster is also wrong - Seles won 8 slams (just one fewer than Connolly) as a teenager. So, remarkable though Little Mo was, it's not true to say "no one was close".
Andrea Jaeger was pretty damn good before retiring at the old age of 19.I'm sure I'm forgetting some, but..
Men: Becker, Borg, Nadal, Wilander
Women: Seles, Graf, Evert, Austin, Hingis
I thought it was implicit in the thread we were talking about the Open era?
Wanted to comment on this as well. Not sure either when the quarter was played, but Final was 11th of June while Nadals bday is 3rd of June, so vive should be correct. Then again we would actually need to know the date of the R16 against Hewitt because on this day it was clear that Nadal had reached the quarterfinal. Anyways I think even this would be after Nadals 20th bday.@vive le beau jeu !
Someone is missing from your list, no?
I'm not sure of the exact date of the FO 2006 quarter-final. It may have been after his 20th birthday
Had Borg entered the AO in 74/75 he could very well also have won 3.Again... Wilander won three slams as a teen. No one else in the OE did that. The list has already been provided in the thread.![]()
Wanted to comment on this as well. Not sure either when the quarter was played, but Final was 11th of June while Nadals bday is 3rd of June, so vive should be correct. Then again we would actually need to know the date of the R16 against Hewitt because on this day it was clear that Nadal had reached the quarterfinal. Anyways I think even this would be after Nadals 20th bday.
I think he had researched this as well beforehand and this is why he deliberately put his statistic as MULTIPLE QF/SF/etc reached before turning 20.From online searches, the date of Nadal-Hewitt was 5th June 2006.
Thus vive is saved from writing the name of the Nadal by 3 days.
I think he had researched this as well beforehand and this is why he deliberately put his statistic as MULTIPLE QF/SF/etc reached before turning 20.
No one comes closer to the level of sheer talent on display by nadal at his teenage.Who would you say were the best teenage tennis players of all time, men or women?
How close to #1 would you put Rafa?
i'm sure you're rightI am sure vive's intentions were honourable.
![]()
Stunned nobody has mentioned her in detail but Martina Hingis.
In 1997 at the ripe old age of 16 she won the Australian Open, Wimbledon and US Open as well as making the final of the French Open. She became number 1.
The following year at 17 she defended her Australian Open title and made the US Open Final. Oh and she won the calendar year grand slam in ladies doubles becoming #1 in the world in doubles as well as being #1 in singles.
As a teenager she won 5 slams in singles, 8 in ladies doubles. Insane.
Then why did Borg, Boris and Wilander all win 2+ slams as teens, when Nadal won one? You have "massive respect" for other players, did you ever bother watching them so you have a basis of comparison? Admit it-- were you even alive when Borg, Boris and Wilander played?No one comes closer to the level of sheer talent on display by nadal at his teenage.
With massive respect to other players, but Nadal is nadal.
No ma'am, I am just 26 and surely didn't watch those legends play. I have watched their highlights though.Then why did Borg, Boris and Wilander all win 2+ slams as teens, when Nadal won one? You have "massive respect" for other players, did you ever bother watching them so you have a basis of comparison? Admit it-- were you even alive when Borg, Boris and Wilander played?
If Nadal was the most superlatively talented teenage player in the OE, then why do his slam results trail other ATG's by a significant margin?
The crazier thing was that her doubles triumph was with similarly young women. The 1998 Australian Open doubles she won was with fellow 16 year old Mirjana Lucic Baroni, the following year she won it with 18 year old Kournikova. Her 1997 RG final loss was to 19 year old Iva Majoli, the same year her USO singles title win was against 17 year old Venus Williams.That is absolutely ridiculous. How do you have both the physical maturity at 16 to hang with the greats, and the tennis mentality/point construction to go with it![]()
Super Saiyan Becker
Then won it 'only' once more after that. And now we have players peaking at 34...Won it and then defended it the year after.
Hewitt was also pretty good, IMO.
Hingis maybe? She kinda took the world by storm at 16 and was pretty much everyone could talk about in her teenage years in an era of ATGsWho would you say were the best teenage tennis players of all time, men or women?
How close to #1 would you put Rafa?
1998 Agassi was abysmal (for his standards), but i guess a win-s-a-win.First title beating Agassi as a 16 year old.
Then why did Borg, Boris and Wilander all win 2+ slams as teens, when Nadal won one? You have "massive respect" for other players, did you ever bother watching them so you have a basis of comparison? Admit it-- were you even alive when Borg, Boris and Wilander played?
If Nadal was the most superlatively talented teenage player in the OE, then why do his slam results trail other ATG's by a significant margin?
1998 Agassi was abysmal (for his standards), but i guess a win-s-a-win.
Then won it 'only' once more after that. And now we have players peaking at 34...