Indeed =/ I've only just realised that is his logo, after seeing this thread. So.... Roger'sNadal has a logo?
I dunno I've never been into stylistic lettering; letters are letters. The bull is better imagery and representation, but I really think the design could have been much better. I still have to go for the bull, i'm not into wearing someone else's initials.
what if your initials were Robert Fernandez, huh? lol
I say Fed's just because I don't like the way they designed the bull (even though it's the sign of my patron saint)
RaFa now has two logos:
![]()
![]()
![]()
The reason I like Nadal's logo is because it is much more manly.
I LOLedNadal is not lucky to have a logo, the logo is lucky to have Nadal.
Nadal's by leaps and bounds. It's an actual image with a modern design that has meaning beyond being self absorbed. Monogrammed initials are corny as heck.
I LOLed
Pags you're almost back to your best,mate .
Vamos![]()
Nadal is not lucky to have a logo, the logo is lucky to have Nadal.
Agree. What's creative about initials?Nadal's by leaps and bounds. It's an actual image with a modern design that has meaning beyond being self absorbed. Monogrammed initials are corny as heck.
Federer has a nicer, more distinct mark. It's very classic and understated and it works well. I think it fits him very well.
Nadal's is nice aesthetically, but is a little vague in connection to him. I do like the energetic lines, fitting for Nadal's powerful style of play. I think maybe it needs to grow and establish itself.
Roger is not a *******![]()
Nadal's universal name is sickles?Also Roger's logo is a bit self absorbed where as Rafa's logo represents a universal name given to him by fans.
Omg, hilariously I have just seen something similar on rf.com :lol: crazy crazy people.rafa! cause you can do this!!
http://i51.tinypic.com/1sm91t.jpg