navratilovafan
Banned
Got to go w/Kafelnikov for these reasons as well; but, re: capriati, she should've won more slams, not fewer, given her potential. A lot of wasted years, back and forth. Her wins were against Hingis and Clisters, so not too shabby!
Clijsters was a pre-prime baby at the time of Capriati's slam final win over her in 2001. Capriati still barely won something like 14-12 in the 3rd. Kim should have won that one but choked. Prime Kim would destroy Capriati. The Hingis Capriati was doing well against in 2001-2002 was nothing like the 97-2000 Hingis. A series of tough losses for Hingis- 99 FO final, 2000 U.S Open final, broke her mentally, and had her even starting to lose to inferior players who were not tough matchups for her like Pierce, Capriati, and pre-prime Mauresmo.
Also if Capriati had been active from 94-99 she probably wouldnt have won anything since superior players to her like Graf, Sanchez Vicario, Davenport, prime Hingis, Venus, Serena, and Novotna (on grass and indoors mainly where she is superior to Capriati) were winning virtually all the big titles.
Last edited: