Better year 2006 or 2010?

Better year 2006 or 2010?


  • Total voters
    27

tennis_pro

Bionic Poster
Djokovic was better in slams and defeated prime Federer in USO SF.

Sure, Davydenko was better outside slams fair enough
Sure, especially when he ran out of gas against Tsonga at the AO, lost to Melzer at the FO despite being 2 sets up or got straight setted by Berdych at Wimbledon. US Open was decent but not only that wasn't prime Federer, he also needed to save multiple match points by going for broke and Fed mentioned that he tanked sets in that SF as his mind was on the final.
 

NoleIsBoat

Rookie
Sure, especially when he ran out of gas against Tsonga at the AO, lost to Melzer at the FO despite being 2 sets up or got straight setted by Berdych at Wimbledon. US Open was decent but not only that wasn't prime Federer, he also needed to save multiple match points by going for broke and Fed mentioned that he tanked sets in that SF as his mind was on the final.
The USO run alone is better than anything Davydenko has ever accomplished at a slam :whistle:
 

Apollo17

Rookie
At the USO 2010 Novak. needed to be at his peak as he went to 5 sets in his 1st round. But for Nadal fans he was probably at his peak. Still Nadal had an incredible win against Youzhny.
Not saying USO10 Djoker was peak, but didn't Novak also needed 5 sets to beat Anderson at W15 and Simon at AO16, despite being considered at his absolute peak during this period ?
 

mike danny

Bionic Poster
Djokovic and Nadal were monsters and Federer played well from Dubai to Wimb.
They weren't monsters. Djokovic was extremely average after the AO and Nadal was also pretty average until RG and post Canada.

2006 Fed wins both Wimb, USO and the YEC anyway and people would complain that he is lucky to be dealing with old Djokodal instead of the prime versions.
 
Top