Why djokovic? You guys have him penciled as a beneficiary of slowed courts!
Big 3 amount of series of consecutive Slam titles
- Thread starter Red Rick
- Start date
How about the year before bro? 4R in FO, 1R in wimby..
Tennis_Hands
Banned
I am not going to take your hand and lead you to the post: your argumentation is childish, but I still believe that you are an adult, so you will manage it, I am sure. The takeaway from that situation is not good for you, though: not only you don't know what you are talking about, but you are not paying attention to what is being said. Bad "new" start, but you know me already, I am sure.
AnOctorokForDinner
Talk Tennis Guru
RBA reached SF at WB but not RG. What it tells us??
You've lost it by generalizing.. Good luck!I am not going to take your hand and lead you to the post: your argumentation is childish, but I still believe that you are an adult, so you will manage it, I am sure. The takeaway from that situation is not good for you, though: not only you don't know what you are talking about, but you are not paying attention to what is being said. Bad "new" start, but you know me already, I am sure.
It tells us that Federer is as much as a beneficiary of the courts slowing down!
AnOctorokForDinner
Talk Tennis Guru
UTS logic. Talk to the hand lol.
Tennis_Hands
Banned
You can have the last word as you're a self proclaimed adultIt is important that you showed that you have no argument.
Tennis_Hands
Banned
The lightening fast one? Not sure Mr
Federer would like that!!
mike danny
Bionic Poster
Yeah, big difference...
How about no big wins at the FO, but a really big win at 2001 Wimb? First title indoors too.
We're talking beyond 250s here.. He amassed enough 250s to jack up his titles to over 100..if I'm not wrong, he has more 250s than djokodal put together!!! Prior to his 2003 Wimbledon win, what was his biggest title?
mike danny
Bionic Poster
Many of his 250's are tournaments he usually plays anyway that are 500's today like Dubai, Basel and Halle.
BeatlesFan
Bionic Poster
BeatlesFan
Bionic Poster
Take a few minutes to examine the caliber of Connors 109 titles, many of which weren't even at the level of 250's in the 1970's. And that's not said to diminish Jimbo's record, which is well deserved. To answer the bolded part of your question, Fed's biggest title prior to Wimbledon 2003 was the Masters 1000 win in Hamburg in 2002.
I'm not anti Federer but am not anti djokovic or Nadal too.. But for a tennis player forever revolving around 250s before courts slowed down, what does it say about him? Nadal could have run over had he chose to participate in South American clay
Anyway with all due respect to you, Hamburg 2002 was played in???
King No1e
G.O.A.T.
Lewtwo the Wise puts more line breaks in his stat threads, but the substance is on point. 9/10
mike danny
Bionic Poster
Fed just didn't develop fully, what's the big deal. He was losing everywhere, be it fast or slow.
He was closer to reaching a SF at Wimb than he was to reaching one at RG anyway before 2003.
D
Deleted member 771911
Guest
TBH, some of the Djokovic stretches are not really impressive. Not for an ATG.
Similar threads
- TheNachoMan
- General Pro Player Discussion
