If he wins 9 Wimbys he will most likely also cross 24 (if not 30) Majors.He will break Federer’s Wimbledon record! I’m sure Fed fans will be happy though considering he ended Djokovic reign there![]()
If he wins 9 Wimbys he will most likely also cross 24 (if not 30) Majors.
I doubt there'll be another lost generation.If he wins 9 Wimbys he will most likely also cross 24 (if not 30) Majors.
Depends how he does at the other slams!If he wins 9 Wimbys he will most likely also cross 24 (if not 30) Majors.
The big 3 all had a pet slam. Alcaraz’s could be Wimbledon. It still doesn’t guarantee more than 24 slams. Will have to see what competition is like at each slam and also if he stays fit each year at them all.I doubt there'll be another lost generation.
I doubt there'll be another lost generation.
We don’t. However, none of us knew about Carlos until it happened. These things just happen when we least expect it!For Carlos to have a competition that person should be at least 16 now and known to be special .
Do you know anyone ??
Why? Its 16 years between Alcaraz and Djokovic, it wasnt only one lost generation.I doubt there'll be another lost generation.
Had a late start. Him starting his peak early does not mean it will go longer.Novak did a Pete Sampras career after age 30.
And a guy with motivation as much as Carlos with the start he has won’t even get to 14 ??
The moment he touches Borg and Pete, he is in the big table
It doesn’t mean it will be the same again. One could come in 2-3 years.Why? Its 16 years between Alcaraz and Djokovic, it wasnt only one lost generation.
Won his first early, just took a long time to nail the secondHad a late start. Him starting his peak early does not mean it will go longer.
Wonder if competition played a role in that.Won his first early, just took a long time to nail the second![]()
We don’t. However, none of us knew about Carlos until it happened. These things just happen when we least expect it!
Had a late start. Him starting his peak early does not mean it will go longer.
Well, I am not high on anyone coming up and being Carlos level good, but all you need is a couple of Wawa, Murray, and the likes to derail him.We knew about Carlos 4 years back
Sure, that and injuries can stop him of course. But for some strange reason we havent seen an ATG between Djokovic and Alcaraz (and maybe Sinner). Ill be surprised id they suddenly start to pop up. More likely Alcaraz will be feasting on Tsitis/Meddy/Zverev etc for many years imo.It doesn’t mean it will be the same again. One could come in 2-3 years.
All we know is there is too many variables to predict anything at moment.
A CYGS without the rest will just prove he has weak competition.It means he has many more chances.
He has 64 attempts if he plays until 37. He needs 20/64 . Seems very doable to me.
If he gets CYGS, then he doesn’t even need all that record . That alone places him alongside Laver
Well, I am not high on anyone coming up and being Carlos level good, but all you need is a couple of Wawa, Murray, and the likes to derail him.
There could be 3-4 of them age 15-17 right now we just don't know about.
There could also be a couple of Sinner types that hit late like Djoker or Fed.
If so, than he really will never be up there wit the big 3. Med is the best of those and wasn't even challenging the big 3 when they were post peak except one Djoker meltdown.Alcaraz will be feasting on Tsitis/Meddy/Zverev for many years imo.
A CYGS without the rest will just prove he has weak competition.
He needs minimum 25 slams to even be considered the farm animal. Needs 20 to be with the big 3.
Nah, he needs 20 especially if he disregards masters and weeks at number one. Those matter.If Fed had 18, he would still be big 3. So the number 20 is something you have constructed in your mind
We will evaluate the whole body of work that Carlos has put in and the results from it. He has a CYGS alongside double digit majors, he is part of the big table
Im not sure about why (some say he had some fitness issues, gluten etc), but its not like you get it back in the other end, if you know what i mean. Alcaraz winning early doesnt mean he wont be able to win in his late thirties. Rafa surprised many with showing great longevity although he also peaked early.Wonder if competition played a role in that.![]()
Nah, he needs 20 especially if he disregards masters and weeks at number one. Those matter.
Only ever been one Rafa, but maybe there will only be one Carlos.Im not sure about why (some say he had some fitness issues, gluten etc), but its not like you get it back in the other end, if you know what i mean. Alcaraz winning early doesnt mean he wont be able to win in his late thirties. Rafa surprised many with showing great longevity although he also peaked early.
The lowest slam winner of the big 3 is twenty. But Fed also has a lot records and accomplishment to go with it, some even better than Rafa and Djoker.Why because 20 is a good round number ?
I agree, thats why i think Alcaraz has a really good chance at breaking records. All Big3 are considered at least top5 players in history, and they constantly had to fight each other. Except Sinner, look at the field Carlos is playing. He could have the career of players like Edberg & Becker at age 22.If so, than he really will never be up there wit the big 3. Med is the best of those and wasn't even challenging the big 3 when they were post peak except one Djoker meltdown.
To stand the test of time in tennis and be considered with the greatest of the greats you must reach big 3 levels. Some want to put Carlos the Shepherd up there with the big 3 RIGHT NOW, and some say he will be one day. Well, let us keep track of it.
This will not include petty records like age related records. No one cares how old you were when you did it. Heck, Chang won a slam at 17. Nor are these even all records, just what the big 3 accomplished.
Big 3 Accomplishments:
Most slams: 24 (Djoker), 22 (Rafa), 20 (Fed)
Most weeks at Number 1: 428 (Djoker), 310 (Fed), 209 (Rafa)
Year end number one: 8 (Djoker), 5 (Fed/Rafa)
Total titles: 103 (Fed), 98 (Djoker), 92 (Rafa)
Masters titles: 40 (Djoker), 36 (Rafa), 28 (Fed)
Tour Finals: 7 (Djoker), 6 (Fed)
Most Australian Opens: 10 (Djoker), 6 (Fed)
Most French Opens: 14 (Rafa), 3 (Djoker)
Most Wimbledon Championships: 8 (Fed), 7 (Djoker)
Most USO: 5 (Fed), 4 (Rafa/Djoker)
Longest match streak: 43 (Djoker), 41 (Fed), 32 (Rafa)
Longest slam match streak: 30 (Djoker), 27 (Fed)
Consecutive slam finals: 10 (Fed), 6 (Djoker), 5 (Rafa)
Consecutive slam wins at one slam: 5 (Rafa/Fed)
Reaching all 4 finals in the same year: 3 (Djoker/Fed)
Winning a slam without dropping a set: 4 (Rafa), 2 (Fed)
Total matches won: 1245 (Fed), 1084 (Djoker), 1066 (Rafa)
Slam matches won: 375 (Djoker), 369 (Fed), 314 (Rafa)
NCYGS: 1 (Djoker)
Most consecutive weeks at number 1: 237 (Fed)
Even if he hits 6 slams at age 22? The career of Becker/Edberg?Only ever been one Rafa, but maybe there will only be one Carlos.
It is always If's and maybe's right now. Until he hits double digits I think this is all ludicrous.
He could, I just do not think tennis will be that bad. I mean you are essentially saying 20-30 years with like one (Carlos), maybe 2 (sinner) of ATG's being born.I agree, thats why i think Alcaraz has a really good chance at breaking records. All Big3 are considered at least top5 players in history, and they constantly had to fight each other. Except Sinner, look at the field Carlos is playing. He could have the career of players like Edberg & Becker at age 22.
I might be a little delusional, but ive been waiting for a new ATG for 16 years, so i must be forgiven lolHe could, I just do not think tennis will be that bad. I mean you are essentially saying 20-30 years with like one (Carlos), maybe 2 (sinner) of ATG's being born.
Total titles is a no way IMO. Too many injuries too young and will focus on the big titles as that is the new way. Same with masters. WC and USO I agree. Match streak not with his inconsistent and margin of play. Zero chance on total matches won as he will not play as many. Consecutive finals I do not see either unless Sinner is really trash.Ones I think he has the best shot at:
Of all that, I think the '"easiest" would be grabbing USO GS Titles, but I honestly think he can rule Wimby too.
- Most Slams
- YE #1
- Total Titles
- Masters (already has 5)
- Wimbledon GS Titles
- USO
- Longest match and slam streak
- Consecutive Finals
- Total and Slam matches won
The lowest slam winner of the big 3 is twenty. But Fed also has a lot records and accomplishment to go with it, some even better than Rafa and Djoker.
He will need more than just slams especially if he isn't hitting 20.
Now, could he be talked as one of the greats, sure.
haha we all have been. But that is my point, we are reaching and what the new big 3 now. He might end up being so, I think we should all hope for that, but I am not giving it to him until he proves it.I might be a little delusional, but ive been waiting for a new ATG for 16 years, so i must be forgiven lol![]()
disgusting dad jokeFixed. That one might be out of reach for Carlos...
haha we all have been. But that is my point, we are reaching and what the new big 3 now. He might end up being so, I think we should all hope for that, but I am not giving it to him until he proves it.
That said, unlike all the others we craved for as potential ATG's, he has lived up to it so far.
I just have to be the man who stays behind, I hope you enjoy your journey and think of me if Carlos does what you guys say. I will look back with a smile as I watch old big 3 highlights.
Still, even if someone new arrives, its unlikely it will be a Big3 scenario i.e. 3 of the 5 best players in history born within 6 years. Big3 was actually unlucky in that way.He could, I just do not think tennis will be that bad. I mean you are essentially saying 20-30 years with like one (Carlos), maybe 2 (sinner) of ATG's being born.
Problem is I think that is what made them so great. Being pushed day in and year in for 2 decades. There was never a chance to have a slump. There is a reason runners run faster when someone is chasing them.Still, even if someone new arrives, its unlikely it will be a Big3 scenario i.e. 3 of the 5 best players in history born within 6 years. Big3 was actually unlucky in that way.
The Shepherd's greatest victory was beating a 37 year old Djoker who came off surgery less than a month ago. Meanwhile the big 3 had to deal with prime grass/HC Fed and Djoker, and prime clay Rafa.The Shepherd has to peak higher than Wawrinka apart from grass first. I am still waiting for him to match the performances of 2015 Stan at RG or 2013-14 Stan at the AO. Let's see if he can bring that level.
Consecutive seasons winning at least one GS title: Nadal (10 years).Most wins in a row on a surface: 81 on clay, by Nadal
10 big titles in a season = Djokovic
This one will be a monstrous one for anyone to break, good luck to anyone who thinks they can win 11 big titles in a single season. You would need to be as close to perfect as possible. One of the GOAT records for Djokovic.
Steffi Graf won all 4 majors, Olympic Gold and 6 other titles in 1988 with 72-3 record.
LOL - Isn't this thread about the Big 3 records for Alcaraz to target?
And we are talking ATP records here, but of course you already know this.
Otherwise Federer was never GOAT when he won W 2009, because he never even caught Graf's 22 slams.
Or he can do a navratilova and not win the Grand slam but win…what was it? 5-6 majors in a row?One Grand Slam and all things change instantly.
I might need to look at record for points. I think Djoker has it by a large margin.10 big titles in a season = Djokovic
This one will be a monstrous one for anyone to break, good luck to anyone who thinks they can win 11 big titles in a single season. You would need to be as close to perfect as possible. One of the GOAT records for Djokovic.