W | H | A | T | |
I | T | |||
T | E | L | L | S |
U | S |
That Djokovic had the most complete results against great opponents.
W H A T I T T E L L S U S
W H A T I T T E L L S U S
Car crashes are certainly apt.
Car crashes are certainly apt.
Even if it's HipHipMurray playing like dogsh*t, it will definitely take his career to the next level, de facto.Federer's legacy will forever be in question if he doesn't beat Andy Murray on the way to winning a FO.
Even if it's HipHipMurray playing like dogsh*t, it will definitely take his career to the next level, de facto.
Nadal won Cincinnati in 2013, not sure why this is omitted.
FAKE AND GAYDid he defeat Roger, Novak and Andy en-route to the title?
if not, it's a fake title
Even without Murray, Djokovic beat 2015 Nadal who had 90% wins on clay if you take away losses to Djokovic, Wawrinka and Murray.Federer's legacy will forever be in question if he doesn't beat Andy Murray on the way to winning a FO.
He beat Federer. My bad.Nadal won Cincinnati in 2013, not sure why this is omitted.
Sir I disagree with you because you're selectively displaying some data.Big tournaments won by beating Big4:
Djokovic 14/14
Nadal 10/14 (lacks YEC, Miami, Shanghai, Paris)
Federer 9/14 (lacks RG, Rome, MC, Canada, Paris)
Novak does things the hard way
Big tournaments won by beating Big4:
Djokovic 14/14
Nadal 10/14 (lacks YEC, Miami, Shanghai, Paris)
Federer 9/14 (lacks RG, Rome, MC, Canada, Paris)
You need to edit it at least one more time:
Djokovic 14/15
Nadal 11/15
Federer 9/15
Big tournaments won by beating Big4:
Djokovic 14/14
Nadal 10/14 (lacks YEC, Miami, Shanghai, Paris)
Federer 9/14 (lacks RG, Rome, MC, Canada, Paris)
W H A T I T T E L L S U S
That Djokovic had the most complete results against great opponents.
That Lew likes to include the Big 4 only when it makes Novak look better by treating Murray equal to Fedal. Otherwise he uses Big3
2. Beating Murray at RG proves nothing. Murray at RG is your measuring stick?
Olympics?
In that case Lew should add Sir Andrew to the list as well - since we are referring to a 'Big 4'
How can Djokovic beat B4 when he hasn't beaten Djokovic?Big tournaments won by beating Big4:
Djokovic 14/14
Nadal 10/14 (lacks YEC, Miami, Shanghai, Paris)
Federer 9/14 (lacks RG, Rome, MC, Canada, Paris)
No matter how hard you try, Murray is not great. He's not an all-time great.
Let's add Mury GOAT as well please
9/14 (or 10/15 if we include the Olympics). He lacks: Australian Open, French Open, Indian Wells, Monte Carlo, Paris
Murray better than Federer?Let's add Mury GOAT as well please
9/14 (or 10/15 if we include the Olympics). He lacks: Australian Open, French Open, Indian Wells, Monte Carlo, Paris
Did not beat Big4 to win that title.That should come as news to him!
Did not beat Big4 to win that title.
Big tournaments won by beating Big4:
Djokovic 14/14
Nadal 10/14 (lacks YEC, Miami, Shanghai, Paris)
Federer 9/14 (lacks RG, Rome, MC, Canada, Paris)
Murray 9/14 (lacks AO, RG, Miami, MC, Paris)
He beat Djokovic in the 2009 final in Miami.
I meant IWHe beat Djokovic in the 2009 final in Miami.
He's always struggled big time in IW, has 4 2R exits and 7 in the R16 or earlierNeeds to be replaced with Indian Wells
Surprisingly hasn't won the title there
He's always struggled big time in IW, has 4 2R exits and 7 in the R16 or earlier
Murray?
Or Wawrinka?
Big Three?
'Big' 4, 'Big' Tournaments, 'Big' stupidity?