Nadal_King
Hall of Fame
Better chance although both too low
Bigger possibility to happen- Thiem to win Wimbledon or Medvedev to Win Roland Garros
- Thread starter Nadal_King
- Start date
F
FRV3
Guest
Thiem to win USO is by far the best choice. In fact, it has already occurred.
T
TheNachoMan
Guest
grass is just green clay anyway
evidence: 2008 and 2010 editions of Wimbledon
evidence: 2008 and 2010 editions of Wimbledon
I Am Finnish
Bionic Poster
Tim to win Wimbeldon
Federer and Del Potro
Bionic Poster
Better chance for Fed to win Wimbledon at 50.
I Am Finnish
Bionic Poster
He already did
Federer and Del Potro
Bionic Poster
In actual age, not TTW Fed/Dog years.
The Guru
Legend
Idk most grandpas are over 50 you might have to check your facts
Big_Dangerous
Talk Tennis Guru
I feel like this thread should be title biggest impossibility, because honestly, I would be surprised if Medvedev even wins a single match at RG...
Medvedev: "RG title? Are you kidding me? I just want to win a match!"
Medvedev: "RG title? Are you kidding me? I just want to win a match!"
Federer and Del Potro
Bionic Poster
Well Fed is actually 63 on TTW. So he won one at 60+ already.
Big_Dangerous
Talk Tennis Guru
Djokovic_is_the_best#1
Bionic Poster
Thiem easily.
Phoenix1983
G.O.A.T.
Thiem ain't ever winning Wimbledon.
MeatTornado
Talk Tennis Guru
Only makes it more embarassing that Tim is so bad on the lawn. How slow do they need to make it for him to compete?
The Guru
Legend
I'm sorry but Wimbledon has not slowed much if at all in the last 15 years *shrug*. There are still clear differences between the surfaces and I think they are well balanced. Fast courts in the 90s were bad then and would be straight cancerous now.
Meles
Bionic Poster
Timmy wimby 2021, rolls off the tongue
Beckerserve
Legend
Cannot vote as neither is even possible.
OrangeDoorhinge
New User
Med needs to win a match at RG first, but Tim in wimby
BeatlesFan
Bionic Poster
Thiem beat Fed in Halle, so he's not a complete moron on grass, even with the huge take backs on his strokes.
MusterCoriaKuerten
Rookie
Stuttgart but federer was injured
MusterCoriaKuerten
Rookie
Thiem has a better shot.
Medvedev will never make it past the first week
Medvedev will never make it past the first week
Big_Dangerous
Talk Tennis Guru
Nadal_King
Hall of Fame
I feel Medvedev since his game looks closer to being decent on clay but thiem is a long way from that I feel
Micheal Federer
Rookie
Thiem. I feel with hardwork and practice, Thiem can develop into an all court player. Medvedev still struggles in round 1 of RG.
socallefty
G.O.A.T.
Thiem has won a grass court title (Stuttgart) including beating Federer in the semis. Only 3 players have won Wimbledon in the last decade and one of them has a metal hip while another is almost 40 years old. If Djokovic gets upset in a future Wimbledon, someone with a good all-around game like Thiem could sneak a title - especially as he has learned to use his BH slice well and has a big serve.
Medvedev has not won a single match at the French Open in his career and was upset again in the first round. His flat strokes are the opposite of the heavy spin that most clay court champions use to win on clay. Plus, Medvedev is 0-6 in five-setters and I don’t see him getting through a French Open tournament without playing some five-setters. So, I think the chance of him winning a French Open title is more remote than Thiem winning Wimbledon.
Medvedev has not won a single match at the French Open in his career and was upset again in the first round. His flat strokes are the opposite of the heavy spin that most clay court champions use to win on clay. Plus, Medvedev is 0-6 in five-setters and I don’t see him getting through a French Open tournament without playing some five-setters. So, I think the chance of him winning a French Open title is more remote than Thiem winning Wimbledon.
I Am Finnish
Bionic Poster
Similar threads
