From the ITF rule book:
T IMMEDIATE DEFAULT
The ITF Supervisor/Referee may declare a default for any misconduct violation of the Code. The election to proceed to an immediate default without going through the Point Penalty Schedule is a serious action and should not be taken except for severe and flagrant misconduct.
Throwing a racquet in such close proximity to an official that it touches them ticks the box for me (the fact it didn't appear to do any harm was down to luck).
Why is there a thread on a journeyman lower league player who never made it?
I don't think there is anything automatic about a disqualification having to occur when a thrown racquet lightly touches an official. What would have happened if the racquet touched an official in the foot, and he looked at it and smiled and walked away to his usual position to resume his duties? I suspect, "Code Violation. Racquet Abuse. Warning." would have been the only penalty against the player. When the umpire fell down, though, a DQ was inevitable.Correct--in the present case, the violation is physical abuse commited toward an official. Plenty of precedents for this default (hitting a ball at an official, the Nalbandian rampage, etc.). The umpire actually probably had the ability to default the player even if the racquet had not struck the official but that would have been a closer call. The fact that the racquet hit her (even a glancing blow) made it virtually automatic--every player on the tour (and frankly even those of us who play sanctioned tourneys) knows this to be the case.
And, as pointed out, the fact that no harm occured was largely fortunate and not the proper measure as to whether a default should be imposed. I suspect a fine will follow as well.
I was there!I once threw a ping pong paddle and it stuck in a door, this guy is weak
I don't think there is anything automatic about a disqualification having to occur when a thrown racquet lightly touches an official. What would have happened if the racquet touched an official in the foot, and he looked at it and smiled and walked away to his usual position to resume his duties? I suspect, "Code Violation. Racquet Abuse. Warning." would have been the only penalty against the player. When the umpire fell down, though, a DQ was inevitable.
Actually, officials are instructed to consider consequences when assessing conduct penalties. An offense with no direct consequences is treated more severely than an offense with direct consequences. That player could have done the exact same thing, but if the racquet bounced off the curtain differently than there would have been a simple code violation for racquet abuse, and the match would have continued. Sometimes an action that would not even be a warning turns into a serious DQ only because of the consequences. Ask Tim Henman about this.The issue isn't whether or not it lightly touched the official. For me the automatic disqualification comes because the racquet was thrown in close proximity to a person with sufficient force that it could have easily caused damage.
It was clear he had no control over where it went and shouldn't be shown any leniency because through luck it didn't do any damage. If there was no person in the immediate vicinity (says 20 feet) then I'd agree with just a normal code.
It's a pro tennis player section; it doesn't say what level of pro.
There are 50 million Federer or Nadal threads for you to choose from if you so decide.
The title said "challenger" and you were free not to click (but you did anyway).
What, does she think she's going to get a lawsuit going for that? Such a bad flop. Idiot.
Right or wrong, that's not how it works. The consequences of one's actions play a very large factor in penalties. Angrily throw your racquet as hard as you want into a curtain, if nothing bad happens as a result, the penalty is mild. Miss an easy shot and in mild frustration knock the ball you just missed toward a sideline and hit an umpire in the eye and he goes down, and it's likely a DQ.I agree that even if the racquet had just been "close" he threw it really recklessly and it had some force behind it before it hit the curtain... what if it had struck the umpire on the fly, or had hit a ball person? I've been at that court complex, the he threw the racquet near a corner that is tighter-- the other side of the court he was on is usually next to a middle court which is covered with a carpet of sorts and used for seating-- so the ball people can be out wider on that side, where as there is a side curtain and wall on the side where King threw his racquet.
I think the fine he receives will be big, to make an example for other players as this is certainly going to leave a bit of an ugly mark on the Pros for a while.
Right or wrong, that's not how it works. The consequences of one's actions play a very large factor in penalties. Angrily throw your racquet as hard as you want into a curtain, if nothing bad happens as a result, the penalty is mild. Miss an easy shot and in mild frustration knock the ball you just missed toward a sideline and hit an umpire in the eye and he goes down, and it's likely a DQ.
Same is true in life really. Drive well over the speed limit and don't hurt anyone, and you get a ticket. Do the same thing and hit a pedestrian, and the penalty is likely severe.
She should have been booked for diving, that's for sure.
And for those saying she is an elderly or whatever woman- she agreed to do refereeing at a professional match. She should be physically and mentally fit for the job.
Lmao!! Damn, he threw it so close to her!
Given how little control he really had over the throw, it was closer than I'd be comfortable with... it looks like he turns and throws the racquet without really seeing where anyone is. If it had directly hit somebody it could be a whole lot bigger of an issue...
Watching the video again they were using a 3 ball person crew instead of the usual 6, so the danger wasn't as great of hitting someone, but it was still really reckless.
... the defendant agrees to pay the plaintiff a KFC Supercharger Meal, for a full-scale fill-up.
Hopefully the lines person is ok, they need to get better lines people - not these senior citizens - who could get injured easily.
I agree. Calling lines in a Challenger is an extremely lucrative position. I believe it pays over $300,000 per year plus all of your travel expenses.
Of course it was ... Personally, I would have very much liked to see her pick up that racquet and knock his damn teeth out! Betcha he'd never do it again
Have looked at it numerous times.
He threw his raquet around 8-9 feet from her.
He made a big mistake and should be disqualified.
But she was never in any danger.
Her over reaction was possibly from shock,certainly not fron the frame contacting her at less than 5 mph!
His opponent hit a massively powerful forehand that also had depth and angle on it.
Nadal or Murray could not have got a frame on that.
So what is he so upset about? He played the point well,his opponent was just too good on this particular point.
As she's calling "long lines", she actually does a fair amount of running back and forth between the center line and the sideline. Most meals would be at the tournament, and there would be at least some healthy food choices. It's a long day's work, and she probably made about $90. She likely bought her own uniform. If she was from out of town, she may have paid her own travel expenses. If she makes it to the "bigs", she'd earn a little over $100/day.They also burn a ton of calories from travelling all over the country and are provided food from the official Challenger food sponsor Whole Foods, with housing arrangements coordinated through the most upscale neighborhood in every town.
In all seriousness, people criticize linespeople for not "being in better shape" these folks' job requires them to virtually STAND STILL all day, they travel all the time which makes it hard to get healthy food, and cooking your own isn't really possible when you're working out of a cheap motel. The challenger tour isn't as glamorous as some of us would like to imagine... for the players or the officials.
I feel that the challenger tour was really lucky this event played out the way it did, and everyone ended up ok in the end. If he'd directly hit a lines judge in the head area, he would have done major damage, and the atp as a whole would be in a really bad spot. This guy needs a severe punishment so that other players get the message that endangering others on the court isn't acceptable.
It's even worse that the player had such a bad attitude about the whole thing while it was going on. Get over yourself Darian King. You're a 300-something ranked tennis player that just made an *** of yourself for the world to see. Don't act like you've been given unjust treatment.
That's the exact point where the racquet hits the tarp... look at it compared to the height of the umpire, who is the same distance from the camera. That's not 8-9 feet. Closer to 4-5.
You think challenger tour linespeople travel all over doing tournaments like the players? LOL
Why is the lines woman taking a dive?
This allows me to bring up something I've been wondering for awhile. Why the hell do we have obese semi-comatose folks judging lines in our favorite sport, and who are these people?
First off, when you are that out of shape, just standing for awhile can bring on fatigue and exhaustion..you really want someone in that state calling your shots?
Second...I always assumed if you were into tennis officiating then at some point you were into tennis....yet 90% look like they'd have a coronary if they picked up a racquet?
Just strange, and I noticed very common (especially matches in US)!
Ok, c'mon overly sensitive PC Police..let me have it!:twisted:
he did it with no ill will
if a man who blew his girlfriend`s head off is sentenced to 10 months jail and the rest in house detention then what is so bad about this?
Actually a lot of them do. If you're doing the semis and finals of a Challenger, you're well-qualified, and probably also doing ATP events and majors.You think challenger tour linespeople travel all over doing tournaments like the players? LOL
A) an assumption, and b) that lines person's 'reaction' is totally immaterial ... all that really matters is stupida== hurling his stick into the tarp ... Get it???
Unacceptable, period.
Actually a lot of them do. If you're doing the semis and finals of a Challenger, you're well-qualified, and probably also doing ATP events and majors.
In that case the rules are not just bad but awfulI don't think there is anything automatic about a disqualification having to occur when a thrown racquet lightly touches an official. What would have happened if the racquet touched an official in the foot, and he looked at it and smiled and walked away to his usual position to resume his duties? I suspect, "Code Violation. Racquet Abuse. Warning." would have been the only penalty against the player. When the umpire fell down, though, a DQ was inevitable.