Raonic’s Atlanta Open match starts at 7 pm eastern on the tennis channel. He will be the first pro to debut the v8 on television.
Watching now. It looks like its blacked out for the most part, but you can see it a little in light.
Mods will probably remove this too...Wilson Blade V8 Tennis Racket Officially Revealed by Milos Raonic
Raonic’s Atlanta Open match starts at 7 pm eastern on the tennis channel. He will be the first pro to debut the v8 on television.
I would be shocked if he's actually playing a tournament with a brand new layup...
He's been using a KBlade 98 62RA 360SW 343g 33.1cm
PS. I hope Wilson fixes the low twistweight on the 16x19 version, it's terrible combined with their freeflex.
PS. I hope Wilson fixes the low twistweight on the 16x19 version, it's terrible combined with their freeflex.
Hi did they go back to 18x19 on the 104v8? thanksI've been testing 104, v8, for a month. Felt stiffer, firmer, lower power and more maneuverability than v7. I prefer v7 over this one.
I've been testing 104, v8, for a month. Felt stiffer, firmer, lower power and more maneuverability than v7. I prefer v7 over this one.
69RA?Blade v8 98 16x19
Specifications:
Weight (unstrung): 305 g
Balance (unstrung): 32 cm
Stiffness: 69 Ra
Swingweight (unstrung): 315
String pattern: 16 x 19
Cross-section: 22 / 22 / 22 (mm)
315 sw unstrung?? Must have been the famous wilson qc
I bet it’s unstrung….but still, 66 strung is way higher than I thought they would go…the graphite material/tech is there to dampen is my guess…makes me think they are pushing the Blade more towards the pro staff in terms of feel and away from the Clash…v7 is 62 RA, where as the v13 pro staff is 66.^^^ 69RA Unstrung or strung?
Not so popular but it’s a great stickLook at that price Wilson and wonder why it’s so high….. also we are talking about the S version which is not so popular…..
![]()
It’s a very specific choice…maybe they think players who need flex will just go to the Clash…I think the stiffness makes it a less distinct racquet…Would have to test it when they come out but with that stiffness I might just stick with the v7
I keep hearing about how older blades wereIf that stiffness is accurate I’ll just stick with my gravity’s lol
Good point. Also, they seem to be confusing the product line.So they just came out with a 100 v7, there are no discounts to clear inventory of any v7s, which leads me to believe (coupled with the rumor mill here) that the v8 will be different enough from the v7 (RA?) to keep both v7 and v8 around and at the same price point.
Agree, I might just get Blade 104 v7. Hopefully v7 will be on saleWould have to test it when they come out but with that stiffness I might just stick with the v7
Halep, Svitolina are already using the V8 in Montreal. I guess this will be the big reveal tournament.
Blade v8 98 16x19
Specifications:
Weight (unstrung): 305 g
Balance (unstrung): 32 cm
Stiffness: 69 Ra
Swingweight (unstrung): 315
String pattern: 16 x 19
Cross-section: 22 / 22 / 22 (mm)
315 sw unstrung?? Must have been the famous wilson qc
From tennisinsider , since there is no official info i guess they measured a racquet etc. So strung sw could come from the famous wilson qc , but i believe the RA to be correctWhere is this data from?
That would mean a complete 180 on the flex and 345+ SW strung ....
It’s kind of nuts. And it only makes sense if Wilson is going to a different sales/product line model by maintaining older/different versions. To me this dilutes the brand.Where is this data from?
That would mean a complete 180 on the flex and 345+ SW strung ....
Seems way off, especially if the frame is getting stiffer…There is no way the Sw will be in the same ball park as the blade pro's.. I expect 330sw max for the 18x20
Seems way off, especially if the frame is getting stiffer…
I think raising the strung RA above 64 is a terrible idea. It becomes a less distinct racquet line…it’s a lighter Pro staffWouldn’t surprise me if it was a few RA points higher given we have seen that in blades of the past. But 315 unstrung SW sounds impossible to believe unless it’s an outlier…
I think raising the strung RA above 64 is a terrible idea. It becomes a less distinct racquet line…it’s a lighter Pro staff
There is no way the Sw will be in the same ball park as the blade pro's.. I expect 330sw max for the 18x20
is the new blade a 305 pro staff with one more square inch?
No they are not . Yes, there are ones that are that high. TW average is 334sw. I have 5x 18m then all are 330sw. You can find 325s as well. SW QC is pretty damn hard to nail .. no manufacturer does a great job really. I'll tell you what has been mind blowingly dead on... These new six.one 100. I have 3 and they all are 320-324. Balance all the same and weight within a gram or two...18x20s are already 335-345.
Agrred. Not only BLX but i don't think there has been a blade under 65 RA excepts the V7. So i have no idea why everyone is acting like it's some massive shocking news that it is 65 (not directed at you). Btw, 2015 blade is 65 but the damn thing feels like pure butter. Anyways, i am not surprised they upped th RA. I am curious about the feel. Like we mentioned before. They never change balance, weight and SW all that much... neither RA. Same formula.. V7 was a bit outlier with such low RA and highest SW.64-65 is what I would expect at most given that is what I remember the BLX versions being. Think the more HH balance and lower stock weight still gives it a distinct identity from the pro staff at that RA level.
Agrred. Not only BLX but i don't think there has been a blade under 65 RA excepts the V7. So i have no idea why everyone is acting like it's some massive shocking news that it is 65 (not directed at you). Btw, 2015 blade is 65 but the damn thing feels like pure butter. Anyways, i am not surprised they upped th RA. I am curious about the feel. Like we mentioned before. They never change balance, weight and SW all that much... neither RA. Same formula.. V7 was a bit outlier with such low RA and highest SW.
No they are not . Yes, there are ones that are that high. TW average is 334sw. I have 5x 18m then all are 330sw. You can find 325s as well. SW QC is pretty damn hard to nail .. no manufacturer does a great job really. I'll tell you what has been mind blowingly dead on... These new six.one 100. I have 3 and they all are 320-324. Balance all the same and weight within a gram or two...
Correct.good question but lots of people actually didn't like that countervail for some reason i didn't understand