Lol, the 2011 USO final wasn't even a close match.
PCB too goodDjokovic - Busta USO 2020
Excellent mention.
Simon vs Ferrer, USO 14 and AO 15.
Yes, this is actually a really good pick. I loved this match and Radek/Djoker matches in general. Hell, even straight set wins like 2013 AO and 2016 Canada were very entertaining.Stepanek vs Djokovic Wimbledon 2014
Rain delay screwed Roddick there2004 Wimbly final
Or 7, whichever came first?Indeed, Fed should have won in four.
Or 7, whichever came first?
What such matches do you have in mind? Some of my nominations are:
Federer-Djokovic FO 2011 SF
Federer-Davydenko AO 2006 QF
Sampras-Agassi 2001 USO QF
Djokovic-Roddick 2008 USO QF (Roddick choked when serving for the 4th set)
Any other matches in mind?
I’m disappointed none of my children said Sampras vs Agassi 2001 USO QF. 4 straight TB, wish it went the distance
Lolz I did an oops @mike danny is a good boy.mike danny said it in the OP.
Fed Nadal FO and Wimbledon 2006
And those darn net calls!I agree 2020 AO, Thiem won 76 46 76 76 over Nadal.
Physically Nadal deserved a 5th Set because Thiem didn't look better than him, but mentally he was very messy and not his usual self on big points, so maybe he didn't deserve a 5th Set.
What such matches do you have in mind? Some of my nominations are:
Federer-Djokovic FO 2011 SF
Federer-Davydenko AO 2006 QF
Sampras-Agassi 2001 USO QF
Djokovic-Roddick 2008 USO QF (Roddick choked when serving for the 4th set)
Any other matches in mind?
i think murray won the first set when the roof was open, they closed the roof and allowed fraud to cheat away the next three sets.......i am not 100% sure but they did open and close the roof, that djokovic semis was played totally under the roof.........
The 4 TBs were great, but maybe there should have been a few breaks here and there. However, as it went it was more special in a way.Greatest four set match ever:
Sampras-Agassi USO 2001: 6-7, 7-6 ,7-6, 7-6.
Murray was even slightly better than the first set still lost itFederer won the 2nd set with the roof open.
Rain stopped play early in the third set, and play was suspended for half an hour as the roof was closed for the first time for a Wimbledon final.
2012 Wimbledon Championships – Men's singles final - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
but keep going, you pathetic frauding Nadal fanboy.
Murray was even better than first set of just as good and still lost it
Murray was finishing his service games easier as well which you don’t often see.yep
1st set : 79 points overall
Murray won 42 points
Federer 37 points
Murray : 10 winners, 5 UEs, forced 16 errors from federer , i.e 26 winners+errors forced to 5 UEs (which is pretty good) (+21)
Federer : 11 winners, 16 UEs, forced 21 errors from Murray, i.e 32 winners+errors forced to 16 UEs (not that good) (+16)
2nd set : 78 points overall
Murray won 38 points
Federer 40 points
Murray : 14 winners, 4 UEs, forced 16 errors from Federer, i.e 30 winners+errors forced to 4 UEs (which is pretty good) (+26)
Federer : 19 winners, 8 UEs, forced 17 errors from Murray, i.e 36 winners+errors forced to 8 UEs (which is pretty good)(+28)
Sets? Clearly a single break on three occasions wasn't enough, so I have a hard time dismissing those. There's interpretation for the rest, but that strike rate is shoddy any way you slice it (especially if it's into the net ).3 in games Fed broke already. 9 saved by Djokovic and 4 converted by Fed. It’s 7/23 really that Fed is at fault for. And many of them came in game were Djokovic DFed and made a fair few errors himself.
It was a part joke to the comment. Fed had his chances but not as many as people claim to me.Sets? Clearly a single break on three occasions wasn't enough, so I have a hard time dismissing those. There's interpretation for the rest, but that strike rate is shoddy any way you slice it (especially if it's into the net ).
I agree that typically a poor ratio isn't as poor as it seems - I mean, just intuitively the ratio should on average be more misses than hits, so something like 3/10 seems like it would be reasonable, even though it might seem rubbish at first glance.It was a part joke to the comment. Fed had his chances but not as many as people claim to me.
USO 2010. Would've probably been my favorite match of all time if it did go 5.
61 winners to 16 errors from Nadal one of his best on grass. Nadal even got injury effected in this match as well making it more impressive.1987 AO SF, Cash d Lendl 7-6(1) 5-7 7-6(5) 6-4.
1999 USO QF, Pioline d Kuerten 4-6 7-6(6) 7-6(14) 7-6(8) - raucuous stuff.
2011 WB 4R, Nadal d delPotro 7-6(6) 3-6 7-6(4) 6-4.
That match has a bit of a meme reputation around here but I'd have to agree. A nice match despite the disgusting BP choking on Fraud's side.USO 15 was deserving of a 5 set match. Federer shouldn't have lost in 4.
If he had pushed it to 5, Federer would have won Wimb, IMO. Djoko hasn't been great after playing long matches post 2012 AO.Has anyone said Djokovic-Dimitrov Wimbledon 2014? I think Dimitrov was up 6-3 in the fourth set tiebreak but couldn't push it to five. Would have been fun if he had. He was playing very well that tournament.