I started playing and watching tennis in the mid 80’s, so I never had the chance to really watch Borg play. However, I remember how people would always compare Wilander’s game to that of Borg. Some would say Wilander had more of a complete game, while some would say Wilander was just a mini version of Borg. I recently joined this forum and read similar sentiments when the two are compared. So for those who were lucky enough to have seen both players play can you give me a comparison? Compare 1. Forehands 2. Backhand 3. Volleys 4. Serves 5. Foot speed 6. Mental toughness 7. Anticipation 8. Strategies 9. Endurance 10. Return of serve Another question. Why do so many people believe Borg left the game because he knew he couldn’t compete anymore with McEnroe? If Borg was that much better then Wilander, as most people believe, wouldn’t Borg still be able to beat Mac, cause Wilander did have a pretty good h2h with Mac (6-7). Rabbit, Five0, OrangeOne, Moose, etc…….. I would love to hear from you guys.