The clown has me on ignore, so he wouldn't see it....Hey sure, go ahead and make one. That's what everyone seems to do around here all day.
I'm not against the concept of comparing eras because these discussions can be interesting within reason. But there's a thin line somewhere when hypotheticals become so real for some, they become circular arguments reinforcing themselves.
It seems you're more offended that Nadal is the subject of this thread, but to me, it doesn't matter whether its Fed, Rafa or Novak. Comparing these guys to a past champions to illustrate "weak eras" is just bias masquerading as rational argument.
I'm a huge Fed fan, but just because Novak is closing in on Roger's Wimbledon record does not mean I will start trashing the former's grass achievements - it is what it is; just accept it gracefully.
I'm not offended at all, everyone knows this was a sarcastic response thread.
Agree with your other points.