Brand new Pure Aero VS 2020

  • Thread starter Deleted member 746200
  • Start date

avocadoz

Professional
I said I'd stay away from Babolat for a while due to my sensitive elbow, but I couldn't help myself being the racquetaholic that I am because spec and pj look so enticing. I snuck out for a quick hit and run last night. Don't know if Babolat's QC has improved or not but mine came in exactly at 10.8 oz unstrung. It's a darn good looking racquet and one of the best pjs out there. Less yellow and more graphite gray, which I prefer over the PA. I'm sick of all the uninspired matte blocks of color from Wilson, so I'm here for the classic shine. There's just something exciting about pulling out a bran new racquet and it sparkles (before use and abuse of course). I've always thought of the VS line as nothing more than a gimmick to increase sales for the PA & PD line. My opinion still holds true for the PDVS, which imo does nothing particularly well. So I was skeptical trying out the latest PAVS. I strung it up with rpm blast 16g at 58 lbs and added some tungsten tape to 3 & 9 o'clock. IMO, the PA lacks torsional stability due to the aerodynamic throat design and needs some weight at 3&9. Total weight came to 11.6 oz strung. Despite being 16x20, It doesn't look or feel any different from a 16x19 because the last cross sits very close to the bottom and unecessary to string to be honest. My first impression is that this is a more refined version of the PA. I think Babolat should just drop the VS and call it a PA 98. Although stiffness rating is the same for both, I find the VS plays softer than the PA. Spin and power is plenty despite being 16x20. Like I said, it's a very open 16x20 and might as well be 16x19. I feel it's less sluggish than the PA due to the smaller headsize so it gets around quicker. Control is better than the PA. I have been playing with the Blade 98 (18x20) and got used to hitting hard and flat with it, so going to the PAVS I had to put a bit more topspin into my shots. Control is definitely there and a few times I thought my balls would sail long but dropped in. Serve is easy to generate pace and placement. Didn't volley too much but overhead was a cake with lots of putaway power. Overall, it's just a very easy racquet to pick up and hit with right out of the gate. This is despite not having played for over a month due to the stay-at-home order. Will need to spend more time with it to get a better idea but first impression is that it's a very good racquet unlike the PDVS. I'd say, it's an improved version of the PA. If you're looking for a bit more control from the PA without sacrificing power and spin, this is it.
 
Last edited:

A_Instead

Legend
Good summary...the pa is a good racket but always seem fat to me for some reason...if the pa vs provides the same performance and some areas better in a skinnier package..sounds like a winner
 

mikele

Rookie
I said I'd stay away from Babolat for a while due to my sensitive elbow, but I couldn't help myself being the racquetaholic that I am because spec and pj look so enticing. I snuck out for a quick hit and run last night. Don't know if Babolat's QC has improved or not but mine came in exactly at 10.8 oz unstrung. It's a darn good looking racquet and one of the best pjs out there. Less yellow and more graphite gray, which I prefer over the PA. I'm sick of all the uninspired matte blocks of color from Wilson, so I'm here for the classic shine. There's just something exciting about pulling out a bran new racquet and it sparkles (before use and abuse of course). I've always thought of the VS line as nothing more than a gimmick to increase sales for the PA & PD line. My opinion still holds true for the PDVS, which imo does nothing particularly well. So I was skeptical trying out the latest PAVS. I strung it up with rpm blast 16g at 58 lbs and added some tungsten tape to 3 & 9 o'clock. IMO, the PA lacks torsional stability due to the aerodynamic throat design and needs some weight at 3&9. Total weight came to 11.6 oz strung. Despite being 16x20, It doesn't look or feel any different from a 16x19 because the last cross sits very close to the bottom and unecessary to string to be honest. My first impression is that this is a more refined version of the PA. I think Babolat should just drop the VS and call it a PA 98. Although stiffness rating is the same for both, I find the VS plays softer than the PA. Spin and power is plenty despite being 16x20. Like I said, it's a very open 16x20 and might as well be 16x19. I feel it's less slugglish than the PA due to the smaller headsize so it gets around quicker. Control is better than the PA. I have been playing with the Blade 98 (18x20) and got used to hitting hard and flat with it, so going to the PAVS I had to put a bit more topspin into my shots. Control is definitely there and a few times I thought my balls would sail long but dropped in. Serve is easy to generate pace and placement. Didn't volley too much but overhead was a cake with lots of putaway power. Overall, it's just a very easy racquet to pick up and hit with right out of the gate. This is despite not having played for over a month due to the stay-at-home order. Will need to spend more time with it to get a better idea but first impression is that it's a very good racquet unlike the PDVS. I'd say, it's an improved version of the PA. If you're looking for a bit more control from the PA without sacrificing power and spin, this is it.
Thank you for the review, how would you compare it to the Pure Strike?¿
 

A_Instead

Legend
I am interested in the difference in sweet spot size..while the gen 3 pure strike 16x19 is an impressive offer...its sweet spot seem small to me..
 

Lavs

Hall of Fame
The new PAVS is a Babolat. Even though the stiffness is slightly lower and it’s a 98, it is still a Babolat and plays like a Babolat. Whether that is good or bad is up to you.
As a matter of fact - original Pure Control (very first release) is also Babolat and plays as soft as 59RA. Plush and rock solid feel.
Go figure
 
The new PAVS is a Babolat. Even though the stiffness is slightly lower and it’s a 98, it is still a Babolat and plays like a Babolat. Whether that is good or bad is up to you.

well said. So I'll chime in with pretty much the same sentiments.

I hit one yesterday with gut mains @55 RPM cross @52. Fun to bang from the baseline but not magical enough to switch instantly. I did a side by side test with my PS (both restrung, even went +5 lbs on PS to try and have exact same string conditions), PS had more feel/control and felt like the ball was on the string longer.

RA from TW:
PS16x19: 66
PAVS: 67

I'd love to test a PAVS with an RA in the low 60s

I'll let the string loosen up, but I am not sure that will help a ton. Nice pop, spin, control, but not enough feel in the Pure Aero VS for my current preferences.

If you want a dialed down Pure Aero, you'll love the PAVS. I think that will be the sweet spot, players who grew up or have a long history with Babolat (Drive and Aero) but want a little more control as they get stronger. I played forever with the Pure Drive, Pure Aero, Pure Aero Tour... this would have been an interesting choice with a leather grip and all poly strung around 47-50 if I was still in juniors or college.

Pure Strike, Pure Drive VS, Pure Aero VS... all noticeably different but in the same "world." And I think we get a Pure Strike VS next year, curious if it will be a whole new frame or a paint job of PC mold.
 

jdeloach

Hall of Fame
Getting ready to do some tweaking to my VS. Curious what any of you guys have done with lead, leather, etc?
 

tsamo

Semi-Pro
Currently waiting on this frame to arrive tomorrow. Never actually played with an Aero before, really looking forward to hitting with this one!!
Any advice on strings to test? Right now it has Wilson Revolve at 52lbs but I'm thinking of strings to try with it.
 

mikele

Rookie
I have them with rpm blast rough at 22/21kg, 48.5/46.3 lbs based on Google calculator and I like it a lot. I also put 1 gr of Tungsten tape in the tip and works great. Yesterday put another one but made the racquet too HH and remove it afterwards
 

avocadoz

Professional
Currently waiting on this frame to arrive tomorrow. Never actually played with an Aero before, really looking forward to hitting with this one!!
Any advice on strings to test? Right now it has Wilson Revolve at 52lbs but I'm thinking of strings to try with it.
Hyper G and Tour Sniper.
 

avocadoz

Professional
This is really strange to me, but the Blade v7 despite being softer gives me elbow pain but when I switched to the PAVS it goes away. The new Blade is deceptively stiff. It flexes and you can feel it but its flex does not equate to a softer racquet. It stiffens up quite a bit when you swing faster and harder.
 

snoflewis

Legend
This is really strange to me, but the Blade v7 despite being softer gives me elbow pain but when I switched to the PAVS it goes away. The new Blade is deceptively stiff. It flexes and you can feel it but its flex does not equate to a softer racquet. It stiffens up quite a bit when you swing faster and harder.

i'm assuming you're using the 18x20 based on your signature...but 18x20 patterns tend to give me more issues than open patterns regardless of stiffness. i've never had issues with APDs, PDs, etc. but certain 18x20 sticks with lower RA just don't feel comfortable regardless of string and tension. i'm guessing it has to do with the stringbed being firmer
 

mb82

New User
Ia it a good follow up racket to my aeroprodrive 2013? Or can somebody recommend me a good follow up racket..really like my aeroprodrive but there comes a time I need some new rackets.
 

snoflewis

Legend
Ia it a good follow up racket to my aeroprodrive 2013? Or can somebody recommend me a good follow up racket..really like my aeroprodrive but there comes a time I need some new rackets.

i think this is a great followup to the APD. better control and more solid feel while still retaining much of the pop. It actually may have more spin
 

tsamo

Semi-Pro
Was playing earlier today and I tried the racket strung with Wilson Revolve at 52 lbs...
It was ****ing atrocious, couldn't play for even 10 minutes. I'm restringing it tomorrow with something else.
 

mad dog1

G.O.A.T.
Was playing earlier today and I tried the racket strung with Wilson Revolve at 52 lbs...
It was ****ing atrocious, couldn't play for even 10 minutes. I'm restringing it tomorrow with something else.
More information needed...
 

tsamo

Semi-Pro
More information needed...

Sorry, you're right. It was not the racket's fault from what I could tell. Just that the string was one of the worst ones I've tried to date.
I bought it second hand and it came strung with that, so even if I had not heard good things about it I gave it a chance but...
Anyway I'll string it with something else and try again.
 

mad dog1

G.O.A.T.
Sorry, you're right. It was not the racket's fault from what I could tell. Just that the string was one of the worst ones I've tried to date.
I bought it second hand and it came strung with that, so even if I had not heard good things about it I gave it a chance but...
Anyway I'll string it with something else and try again.
Why was it awful? I only use revolve as a cross. Too soft with not enough feedback in a full bed.
 

tsamo

Semi-Pro
Why was it awful? I only use revolve as a cross. Too soft with not enough feedback in a full bed.

Personally it was way, way too harsh and gave constant vibrations. It was like the racket was strung with metallic wire or something.
 

tsamo

Semi-Pro
52# would be too high for me personally. I’m currently at 44/42.

Maybe that was the problem. Came strung with it though so nothing I could do about it.
Now wondering if the person sold it because it felt so awful without realizing the string at that tension was the problem and never tried anything else...
 

snoflewis

Legend
I think the higher tension makes it feel more unstable in the upper hoop. I had mine strung with ice code 1.25 at 50# and stock form wasnt as solid. Added 1g each at 11 and 1 and it's pretty awesome. Ice code is also a pretty slick string, so i think most other polys woukd be better strung lower
 

JEDI MASTER

Professional
Was playing earlier today and I tried the racket strung with Wilson Revolve at 52 lbs...
It was ****ing atrocious, couldn't play for even 10 minutes. I'm restringing it tomorrow with something else.

Try Hyper G @ 52lbs.
add few grams at 10 and 2:00
 

mad dog1

G.O.A.T.
Maybe that was the problem. Came strung with it though so nothing I could do about it.
Now wondering if the person sold it because it felt so awful without realizing the string at that tension was the problem and never tried anything else...
I think the higher tension makes it feel more unstable in the upper hoop. I had mine strung with ice code 1.25 at 50# and stock form wasnt as solid. Added 1g each at 11 and 1 and it's pretty awesome. Ice code is also a pretty slick string, so i think most other polys woukd be better strung lower
@tsamo

my 44/42# is done using my modified JC method which yields a string job that's closer to 47/45# when strung conventionally. also i string on a babolat sensor machine and snoflewis strings on an alpha w/ wise tensioner. both are constant pull, but the babolat turntable and supports are alot more rigid which also yields a string job that's firmer. when it's all said and done, i think my string job only feels ~3#s less than snoflewis' string job.
 
Ia it a good follow up racket to my aeroprodrive 2013? Or can somebody recommend me a good follow up racket..really like my aeroprodrive but there comes a time I need some new rackets.
I totally agree with Snoflewis. This racquet is a fantastic follow-up to the APD 2013. Let us know what you think!
 

gutfeeling

Hall of Fame
@tsamo

my 44/42# is done using my modified JC method which yields a string job that's closer to 47/45# when strung conventionally. also i string on a babolat sensor machine and snoflewis strings on an alpha w/ wise tensioner. both are constant pull, but the babolat turntable and supports are alot more rigid which also yields a string job that's firmer. when it's all said and done, i think my string job only feels ~3#s less than snoflewis' string job.

I can validate this. 40-44 lb on my Babolat Sensor yields a firm stringbed using stiff poly. Combine that with a stiff frame and no need to go higher. Otherwise you will get the "frying pan" experience and actually decrease spin.
 

David Le

Hall of Fame
I’m testing one soon when it arrives. I’ve been playing on and off with the OG APD since I was 11. I do love the 16x20 pattern since one of the racquets I had in high school had it. Overall, how does it compare to the OG APD? Does it have the ‘raw’ feel that the OG APD has?
 
Last edited:

mikele

Rookie
I’m testing one soon when it arrives. I’ve been playing on and off with the OG APD since I was 11. I do love the 16x20 pattern since one of racquets I had in high school had it. Overall, how does it compare to the OG APD? Does it have the ‘raw’ feel that the OG APD has?
I prefer this one to the APD original, this one has more control, similar power and the feeling is better in my opinion. With the APD OG I had some stability and jarring issues when the ball was hitting the tip of the racquet, I don´t have this issue on this racquet which is more solid and stable.
 

David Le

Hall of Fame
I prefer this one to the APD original, this one has more control, similar power and the feeling is better in my opinion. With the APD OG I had some stability and jarring issues when the ball was hitting the tip of the racquet, I don´t have this issue on this racquet which is more solid and stable.
Interesting. I would agree with the better feel because of the beam width. The OG APD wasn’t the best in the feel/touch department. How does the stiffness compare? Obviously it’s due to the tension of your strings, but give or take.
 

Lavs

Hall of Fame
Interesting. I would agree with the better feel because of the beam width. The OG APD wasn’t the best in the feel/touch department. How does the stiffness compare? Obviously it’s due to the tension of your strings, but give or take.
Sorry, but I would not agree. APD Original has the best feel among all APD releases. It is raw and honest. It does not dump which allows to hit with some good top spin as long as to flat the shots out.
You actually "feel" the ball upon contact, in contrast to all Cortex versions or Pure Aeros, which totally dump the feel. OG APD is most flexible too (not saying it is soft but it's highest comfort comparing to other APDs/PAs)
 

mad dog1

G.O.A.T.
I prefer this one to the APD original, this one has more control, similar power and the feeling is better in my opinion. With the APD OG I had some stability and jarring issues when the ball was hitting the tip of the racquet, I don´t have this issue on this racquet which is more solid and stable.
Completely agree. And the PA VS has better stability than the APDO with a much lighter swingweight.
 

David Le

Hall of Fame
Sorry, but I would not agree. APD Original has the best feel among all APD releases. It is raw and honest. It does not dump which allows to hit with some good top spin as long as to flat the shots out.
You actually "feel" the ball upon contact, in contrast to all Cortex versions or Pure Aeros, which totally dump the feel. OG APD is most flexible too (not saying it is soft but it's highest comfort comparing to other APDs/PAs)
I’m sorry if my wording wasn’t understanding, but of course the OG APD has the best feel/raw power out of all APD. I wouldn’t consider the PA as part of the main APD family but a branch or distant cousin. I would’ve thought that racquets that have a thinner beam would have a better feel/touch?
 

gutfeeling

Hall of Fame
Sorry, but I would not agree. APD Original has the best feel among all APD releases. It is raw and honest. It does not dump which allows to hit with some good top spin as long as to flat the shots out.
You actually "feel" the ball upon contact, in contrast to all Cortex versions or Pure Aeros, which totally dump the feel. OG APD is most flexible too (not saying it is soft but it's highest comfort comparing to other APDs/PAs)
I have not played the PAVS. But as a long time APDO user, I think its greatest strength was also its greatest flaw. Stiff poly in this frame transmitted nasty vibes to my arms. Otherwise I loved the performance of the frame.
 

Lavs

Hall of Fame
I have not played the PAVS. But as a long time APDO user, I think its greatest strength was also its greatest flaw. Stiff poly in this frame transmitted nasty vibes to my arms. Otherwise I loved the performance of the frame.
The only thing you should have been done to avoid any vibes on your arms is to put some Silicone into the handle. Issue solved.
 

gutfeeling

Hall of Fame
The only thing you should have been done to avoid any vibes on your arms is to put some Silicone into the handle. Issue solved.

I actually developed chronic pain in my right shoulder and left wrist (2 handed backhand). Silicone may have helped with the bottom hand but not sure how much it would have done for the top hand. After a few years with the APDO I understood the concept of the cortex dampening tech. I could have also played a softer poly or a hybrid with a softer string.
 
Top