Call me when it is a SLAM (Djoker and Rafa dont care about these masters)

I don't like the hype for a kid that has reached the qf of a slam once. We have done this a million times. I'm tired of it. Plus, it is proving they're a lot of bandwagon fans here out for glory.
I admit my main excitement about Tiny Carlos™ is the possibility that he will help keep Fed's loss margins stable in the slam count vs. Djokdal.

Ridiculous fanboying I know.

But also - I am dreadfully tired of Novak pretty much winning everything for years now.

So it was nice to see today. Cause he wasn't losing to Tsitserev tomorrow.
 
Med was close but it was all on one surface and he was much older. Carlos during this run is 18 and 19. At 18 and 19, most players are getting beaten in straight sets every other match except for a few rare cases. At the age of 18 and 19 on multiple different surfaces, it takes a Herculean effort to defeat this guy and even in those defeats he has plenty of chances to win. This simply does not happen to 18 and 19 year old players. Ever.

No guarantees of anything but this is the clear signs that this guy is a different and special breed
Maybe. If so, he should prove it at slams.
 
sorry i had no first hand knowledge of that
he said it in the presser:

From NYTimes

"Ben Rothenberg: Rafa, it seemed like you didn't care today - I mean, the way you were playing.

Rafa: I no care. I am - how you say - anxious about missing Sonic the Hedgehog 2 tonight cause of the length of the match, no? So I stop caring about the first set, even at net photo before, I already say to myself: "Charlie, I no care."
 
he said it in the presser:

From NYTimes

"Ben Rothenberg: Rafa, it seemed like you didn't care today - I mean, the way you were playing.

Rafa: I no care. I am - how you say - anxious about missing Sonic the Hedgehog 2 tonight cause of the length of the match, no? So I stop caring about the first set, even at net photo before, I already say to myself: "Charlie, I no care."
Haha but he did say something of the sorts that he wasn't ready for Madrid and was okay and expecting the loss.
 
Never said mug. Said potential. But if he cant compete over 5 sets at the big stage, then he simply is not ready and should not be treated as such. Seen it too many times the past decade. My take is the same take as all the others the past decade... I currently have a 100% success rate in calling it how I see it.

Sure you're 100%, of course. Amazing how people keep denying things every step of the way - saw it with Federer, Nadal and Djokovic too. He's way more than potential and has been for some time - he'll be talked off in the same breath as the Big 3 pretty soon - get ready for mid 2000s Federer / mid 2010s Djokovic dominance.
 
Sure you're 100%, of course. Amazing how people keep denying things every step of the way - saw it with Federer, Nadal and Djokovic too. He's way more than potential and has been for some time - he'll be talked off in the same breath as the Big 3 pretty soon - get ready for mid 2000s Federer / mid 2010s Djokovic dominance.
Already a big 3 with zero slam SF. Wow. Ttw really hanging on to anything now.
 
Medvedev is 26/27. Alcaraz is 19.
What are you even talking about. Of course we are talking potential. What are you talking about or did you think Alcaraz was 26?

Yeah it's idiotic - but then the same attacks have happened before - Nadal is sh*t off clay when he was 19, etc. It's like the demand is for a teenager to be 28.
 
Back
Top