JohnYandell
Hall of Fame
Curious,
Really can't say. Would need to film you myself on my court.
Really can't say. Would need to film you myself on my court.
The key is the bad form allows you to sneak up on people. If your technique is sound, your opponent will be more focused.Why? If you can beat him you are at his level or above. If he is bothered by how your form is that’s on him. If you feel that having an ugly form means something more when you win , then you are just underrating yourself.
Btw That was not the point of this thread. Don’t feed curious the wrong info. Be blunt on what is holding him back from a 4.5. It’s not beautiful or ugly form that is doing that.
With your second sentence, you probably meant if your form is more conventional than the opponent might not underestimate you.The key is the bad form allows you to sneak up on people. If your technique is sound, your opponent will be more focused.
Don't let ballmachineguy and zill get to you.This is the most relevant post in this thread and explains my point perfectly in a few sentences.
Anyway here’s the good news for you guys! I won’t be posting anymore until/if I can be pain free again and start playing competitive tennis. I don’t want tennis in my life if I can’t play it because of pain. It’s too depressing.
I don’t take crap from people that can’t spell definitely.Don't let ballmachineguy and zill get to you.
Your tennis is just fine, even good, for a person your age.
Your posting is part interesting, part confusing (like you ask if you have enough pace, placement. For sure! Definately enough for 3.0 players and ballmachine, yellow optic, zill and a few others.) but never depressing.
You definately have learned something from me. Good job.I don’t take crap from people that can’t spell definitely.
Thanks for the article. It’s worth readingThe right grip and swing low to high. The rest is talk tennis academy!
![]()
Basic Tennis Tips | The Myth Of Correct Tennis Technique
A comprehensive look into the modern tennis technique and how form must follow function in order for the technique to be effective.www.feeltennis.net
Technique is important but movement is just as important as well as watching the ball I mean really watching it.
No such thing as perfect technique. Strive for excellence rather than perfection.I'm happy to use any technique that works.
Thanks for the article. It’s worth reading
No such thing as perfect technique. Strive for excellence rather than perfection.
You might be able to produce somewhat decent results with technique that is flawed. But you will likely not attain the same high level that you would from better technique. Also, highly flawed technique will more likely result in an overuse injury that proper technique.
I should have been more clear. I meant just getting to the ball in time. Better anticipation so you’re not rushed, trying to get to the ball early enough so you hit in your wheel house.Isn't the execution of particular movements considered a part of tennis technique? imo, it includes elements such as grip, body positioning, footwork, balance, timing, coordination, swing or stroke mechanics, and recovery. While it's certain that a small but vocal minority emphasize the importance of the swing alone in defining technique, there's a risk of missing the significance of the interconnected aspects in getting better at tennis.
The guy want to bail on correct technique and start all over again in search of a poor technique. That makes no sense. The guy is virtually doing one thing wrong on each wing(they are doozies though), and he wants to give up.
Definitely not many 4.0 players have very good technique.I’m after 4.0 with bad technique. Possible? That’s the main question of this thread.
Exactly. If he had focused more on bigger issues (like making sure his ball goes toward the intended target) he would already be 4.0 by now.He thinks his focus on "correct technique" has held him back in terms of overall level. He is yet to realize that his focus on trivial things is the reason.
In a perverse way, the search for poor technique might help as he is likely to shed the incessant obsession on insignificant details.
Well, Robin Soderling had fairly ugly strokes and was a top 10 player so it's possible to play high level with less than perfect technique.
For Curious:
1. Get over trying to have perfect modern wristy strokes. Instead work on having a stable wrist just before, during and just after contact. Let the core and specifically the shoulders drive the stroke. Think hit up and thru contact in a stroke and not a "whip".
2. Learn both a slice and topspin backhand. Lendl is a better model than most modern players as he had a very simple topspin and slice backhand with little to no wrist action.
3. Get a hitting partner and drill. CC FH, DTL FH, CC BH, & DTL BH, volleys, overheads and serves. Work on hitting targets.
4. Play practice sets and tie breakers
5. Join a league and play competitive matches to get feedback on progress.
Way to subtly plug yourself.the secret is, ttw post count and & ntrp level have an inverse relationship!
Okay, I'll take your word for it but in my experience by the time most 5.0s get to 5.0, their game is what it is because of their stroke mechanics, or to put it another way, the path from 5.0 to 5.5 rarely lies through overhauling strokes at the level of grip changes.I am rated 5.0 but having trouble generating more power and dictating points with higher tier 5.0/5.5 because of my western grip (not wrapping my hand around the full handle) AND I do not fully take the racquet back all the way when I swing on the forehand side. I do think you can move upward to 5.0 when you have the fitness and consistency. The reason for the change is that I have the potential to become 5-10% better, which is significant in the higher levels.
That is because they are doing something different than you do.@Curious
Where's your tennis at now?
Learn this FH from this coach. Looks simple.
![]()
I'm dropping Alcaraz style, and going back to my own familiar style which looks like this coach. Simply keep the racket head high and the racket face somewhat opens forward.
Djokovic's and Alcaraz with inverted racket face is just too hard to do!!!
Of course, we are different people.That is because they are doing something different than you do.
Yes, they do it correctly, and you being different, do it incorrectly.Of course, we are different people.
Have you heard of MEP?Would you agree that there are a lot of 4.0-4.5 level players who are pretty consistent with imperfect technique? Could good movement, balance, timing, years of experience make up for imperfect technique?
How do you guys pronunciate MEP?Have you heard of MEP?
It is never spoken.How do you guys pronunciate MEP?
Living in the distant past?How do you guys pronunciate MEP?
It looks like @user92626 from some Spanish-speaking country.Living in the distant past?
Pronunciate? Rather odd word. So much so that it was autocorrected when I typed it. It does not appear in most modern dictionaries at all. One dictionary that does list is indicates that it’s an obsolete alternative to “pronounce”.
Oxford English Dictionary
The OED is the definitive record of the English language, featuring 600,000 words, 3 million quotations, and over 1,000 years of English.www.oed.com
Fair enough, but that is somewhat semantic. "Bad technique" needs defined for the sake of this discussion, versus what some might call "non-optimal" technique.Nobody can improve with bad technique. What's bad technique? The one that does not keep the ball in play. Not good looking is not bad. Not working is bad.
Fair enough, but that is somewhat semantic. "Bad technique" needs defined for the sake of this discussion, versus what some might call "non-optimal" technique.
Do you think @Curious has bad technique?
Why did you give up? Fear of losing to bums?As someone who has chased the perfect technique for years and eventually conceding defeat, where do I go from here?
Is it possible to improve one's tennis with bad/flawed technique? As long as the ball goes where it needs to and with certain optimal qualities, does it really matter how the player does that? I'm sure everyone would have witnessed very weird looking strokes in rec tennis that still do the job.
Would love to hear especially from some pros here like @JohnYandell , @J011yroger , @tennis_balla and others that I can't think of at the moment.
Why did you give up? Fear of losing to bums?
No one can be perfect but you can be to a level you're satisfied with.
rec tennis truth bomb.Short answer is yes. Without knowing your exact level but I believe 4.5 is achievable with "mediocre" technique. I would say if you have a reproducible stroke on most shots, then it is good enough to get to at least 4.5. What is hindering the average rec player is their ability to recognize and get into position to hit their reproducible shot. If you can do that consistently, probably gonna blow everyone else out of the water.
That has nothing to do with your technique but your physical ability. If you train, move faster, see the ball better/quicker, etc etc.
If you watch 4.5s (I am one of them), you will see a wild variety in technique for every shot. Its just that most of them that got there as a rec player know how to get into position to hit their specific technique shot. Nothing else to it. Alot of 4.5s have some combination of good movement and/or anticipation.
Personally, my volley technique is pretty janky. But at the end of the day, I know when to just block it back into play. I am also super fast (to put it into perspective, I have had other players joke that I somehow teleported). So while my volley technique isnt that good, I make up for it by being super close and quick at the net. At the end of the day, getting it back over and in, wins the day.
Since you're super quick at the net, are you really fit? Have a normal BMI?
I wonder how we can measure quickness to see where we rank. Simply, below, average, above, or excellent rating.
How can you still lift things if you only weigh 140 lbs?I am very fit, I lift almost daily. I went from 180 lbs to 140 lbs. I can confidently say I am in the excellent quickness category. Easily in the top 5% percent.
I went from being barely able to lift myself and now I can carry myself and 1 racquet for 2 hours. Which is apparently just strong enough to get to 4.5 and carry 3.5 ladies.How can you still lift things if you only weigh 140 lbs?