The pile of excuses grow and grow every time you post, this is too tiring sifting through them all. I'm sorry, i'm not reading whatever you posted just now. It's just regurgitation at this point. Adios, i'm done here, didn't make one post to engage in another ****-fest of excuse-making with you.
And yet again, being so cowardly........
My point was about this anyways.
" Nadal was the only player who could beat Federer even when he was playing extremely well. That demoralized Federer. Perhaps it is responsible for one or two losses, but not 23"
response:
"Rome 06, Hamburg 08, AO 09 (&Dubai 06 --this was before a mental block was formed though in their matchup) were matches that Federer would've won if he was clutch enough.
mental aspect played quite a bit of part in both sets of Monte Carlo 08 , in RG 11 , AO 12, even if its not necessary that Federer would've won without being affected mentally.
played a role in Wim 08 final as well, especially the first 2 sets where he was subdued ..he himself flat out stated. " I think it affected my first two sets at Wimbledon. "
match could still have gone either way, but to say it didn't have a role is just being ignorant."
but you don't have the guts to accept you were wrong here, do you ?
-----------------------------
and of course the rest of it is your delusional, biased self .
I answered your question about "excuses" for Nadal.
But you couldn't do anything with the answer, so now, avoiding respondning to that.
and Nadal was visibly sluggish in AO 09 final ? LOL ..........that was his best AO and that final was among his 3 best matches at the AO (vs an atleast decent opponent ) --- AO 09 SF/F, AO 12 SF
the kind of sh*t you bring up is hilarious...
Nadal was visibly sluggish in AO 09 final, he was terrible in Cincy 2013 vs federer.... LOL !!!!!