bitcoinoperated
Hall of Fame
Richard Williams didn't have any money, and played the girls with dead strings and flat, used balls from a local club. Apparently talent is what counts.
This is the story he'd like people to believe.
Richard Williams didn't have any money, and played the girls with dead strings and flat, used balls from a local club. Apparently talent is what counts.
I think they were at Greenleaf with Macci before bolletteri's.
Thats what i dont like about them,
if richard was their coach they wouldnt of made it far,
they never give praise to the coaches who gave them free lessons for 6 years ($3-4k a week, they stayed over night)
Sharapova was the same, she was dirt poor and got a scholarship at bolleteri's.
PRO tennis is available to any kid, sign up for a Futures or a Challenger. Pro sports are a business, it's about the gate. The public pays huge amounts to buy tickets to pro basketball and TV rights. They're not as interested in tennis, you can watch challengers and futures for free or maybe $10 for finals. Tennis isn't all about the money. Your kid can make a modest living playing basketball in Europe but for how long? Once he can't play anymore then what he gonna' do with it?--hang out in the park? Being an adequate college tennis player will give him a lifetime of entrees to the country club where maybe he can marry the bosses daughter or get some stock tips. And, it's a lot easier to gather up one to three players for some tennis then six to ten for basketball when your 75.It's not a question of whether tennis is an expensive sport, see the following:
Average Costs
Noah Rubin
But if it can ever shed that reality and become a sport for the average kid. I for example can only do so much by running free clinics with my son and his friends. I was just a regional player and even if I ran drill after drill after drill, I'd still have to pay at some point to get him into tournaments and at least some private lessons from higher level players.
Or, I can practice basketball with him, a sport I played in college, and make sure he's on a club team or two year-round and also playing in school. That ain't going to cost me much and if he gets a college scholarship he's on his way. If he never gets a look from the NBA he could get a spot on a team in South America or Europe and get a decent salary to live off.
You would think it's in the best interest of the sport at large to have more Sampras stories than Noah Rubin no?
Sparkl'es got it right, very few rich kids make it to the top of tennis. Rich kids don't have the drive or hunger to succeed. Most great tennis player's come from immigrant families, many times their parents were janitors at clubs which gave them an opportunity to play and they learned all the shots from the members. Tennis is one of the most egalitarian sports there is. Rackets are just about littering the streets, sitting unused in closets or you can get a brand new POG for $5 at Goodwill. Now skateboarding, there's an expensive sport, good boards cost a lot and the cost for broken bones and concussions adds up--don't know if Stanford's giving out scholarships yet for it.
Not that this is unexpected, but this thread is extremely tennis-biased. Unless you're an ex-player yourself, you don't just go shoot hoops with your kid on the weekends, plop them into high school tryouts, and wind up with a kid worthy of a significant college scholarship and potential NBA team attention. You'll still need to be enrolling them in club sports and hope to make the local premier/traveling team for regular year-round competitive experience with good coaches. Private lessons exist, too.
Only about 5% of basketball players in high school go on to play in college. Not many of those get much of a scholarship, if anything. And a small portion of those are going to actually get on teams at the big D1 schools. And very few of those are going to actually be good enough to get pulled up into the NBA. Yes, more international opportunities exist for basketball, but it's still a really low percentage of overall players that make it there.
I think the difficulty of even just getting a scholarship for basketball (let alone making it pro, even internationally), has been severely underestimated...
Hahaha, you've just proved him right.We sure don't have space for people with (well) below average intelligence though.
Yeah, there were at least 999 other families who tried the same in the US in that period just like Williams family. It's just like business, some succeed but most fail but you only hear about the success stories.This is the story he'd like people to believe.
No more diversification is necessary and it needs promotion, when I was younger, there were tennis courts within a 5 minute walk , On the weekends the courts were filled with mixed doubles, Husband and wife, Guy and girl friend and so forth, it was considered exercise and many liked the social play, now adaze the popularity has gone back down,,,,Tennis must appeal to a wide group and coaching is not that expensive unless you go to clubs, then your looking at thousands of dollars paid to be a average player.
Cheers
3Fees
I guess it must be different in the states, but with football (or soccer as you guys call it), it's our most popular sport and is a hell of a lot cheaper than tennis. I mean, if you a very talented, and play in a professional clubs academy as youngster the club will pay for you and if you're still with them until a certain age you would get paid.This thread premise is terribly stereotyped and wrong at its pure base.
Tennis already is a "every mans" sport. I play with tons of people across all income/ethnic/economic/cultural backgrounds.
Furthermore anyone that thinks other sports are "cheap" to play at a high level or be competitive at you are fooling yourselves.
As a father of 3 boys I know that (here in America) trying to get your kids playing at a highly competitive level in any sport is expensive.
Basketball? Sure anyone can go "shoot hoops" on the cheap. You want to be good, get at a level college scouts will notice you, and play with the best? You'll be joining a club team quick which costs thousands of dollars per year, and its not like you just go pick a freaking team and play. Your kid has to try out and be good enough. If he is not then you better get him in some local leagues and get him coaching to get good enough. Then once on a club team you buy the expensive jerseys, shoes, clothing. You also have to have a travel budget, etc......
Footbal and baseball same story.
No sport is "cheap" to play.
You may get the perception that its cheap looking at high school sports because our public education system chooses to fund football, basketball, and baseball with taxpayer money much more than any of the other sports.
I guess it must be different in the states, but with football (or soccer as you guys call it), it's our most popular sport and is a hell of a lot cheaper than tennis. I mean, if you a very talented, and play in a professional clubs academy as youngster the club will pay for you and if you're still with them until a certain age you would get paid.
As a you drop down to the Sunday/Saturday league level you have to pay, but I wouldn't call it expensive. Often costs like travel are split as parents will rotate picking up groups.
Wouldn't call it "cheap" either, but tennis in a whole different category when compared with football and even less popular sports like basketball and rugby. Price as well as other factors, particularly as it's an individual sport, make it all the more difficult to reach high levels such in team games.
When the cost is split between, what, 16 people for training and over 20 for a match, not a great deal.But what are the costs of hiring a football pitch? Why can football parents split travel costs, but not the tennis ones?
The costs of playing recreational tennis are often exaggerated, while the costs of playing recreational football tend to be overlooked. It's the same with ticket prices. People assume Wimbledon is hugely expensive and only for "the snobs", but have you seen the price of a ticket for a Premier League match lately? "Normal" people will pay huge amounts for a season ticket, and will spend a lot extra to travel to away matches, taking a huge chunk out of each weekend.
Yes, if you live in the right area and are spotted, a talented young footballer can be taken on by a club, but it normally includes a big sacrifice by the family to help to make it work. The super-talented will be picked up young and can sign contracts on their own terms, but as in tennis, it's harder to get it to work if you aren't an obvious star.
@cknobman, please edit this post. Your one of the saner posters - this can't be you.This thread...
It's not a question of whether tennis is an expensive sport, see the following:
Average Costs
Noah Rubin
But if it can ever shed that reality and become a sport for the average kid. I for example can only do so much by running free clinics with my son and his friends. I was just a regional player and even if I ran drill after drill after drill, I'd still have to pay at some point to get him into tournaments and at least some private lessons from higher level players.
Or, I can practice basketball with him, a sport I played in college, and make sure he's on a club team or two year-round and also playing in school. That ain't going to cost me much and if he gets a college scholarship he's on his way. If he never gets a look from the NBA he could get a spot on a team in South America or Europe and get a decent salary to live off.
You would think it's in the best interest of the sport at large to have more Sampras stories than Noah Rubin no?
@cknobman, please edit this post. Your one of the saner posters - this can't be you.
So LeBron James' family had money? Or most of the blacks in the NFL and NBA? Are you kidding?
You don't need a personal coach or membership to a club or parents able to pay for an academy to excel in US football, hoops, or baseball. And yes, if you excel in public schools, some college will find you.
you can also swim naked...Running is cheap. Don't even need shoes...
I'm of the opinion a parent shouldn't be expected to make sacrifices so their kid is able to develop athletically. If you have parent spending time with their children after work and on weekends concentrating on one sport and making sure they are in proper programs, that should be sufficient. Tennis itself is in no way cheap unless you're playing with shredded shoes, worn out strings and flat balls. Common now. Here's a conservative estimate of 6 months in serious tennis training:
The average person wouldn't play it even if it was cheap. It's too hard to learn. 99.9% of people who play the sport never even learn to serve properly. That includes over 90% who play at club level.
There will always be a massive gap between pro level tennis and recreational tennis. In my opinion, this gap is bigger than in most other sports. Because tennis requires not only athletic skills but also a very high level of intelligence and independent thinking. Only quality individuals can become good players.
Tennis coaching isn't cheap. Parents making sacrifices still earn enough to be able to make sacrifices. The average family income in the UK would not be enough if their kid(s) were serious about a tennis career. It's a snobby sport, with snobby fans unfortunately. Just look at the likes @Say Chi Sin Lo, @ollinger, @Bartelby etc. Pretty much says it all.
It's why football and boxing will be known for being the best sports for this reason. The sports don't need you to be rich, or tall. Literally some of the greatest icons of these sports have been homeless at 8 (Pac), close to being shot in dangerous areas (Mayweather), some people have been discovered playing in the park (Messi).
Unfortunately boxing is of course inexpensive and with the amount of idiots inhabiting the earth will always be popular.
Being a good boxer doesn't mean you are dumb, they take the same path other sportsman do; They train from a young age, work, work, work, then go pro. They simply don't have time to enhance their intelligence. What you have said is quite stupid. You don't need to be academically smart to pursue any sport. It's a very tough sport to learn and a much harder sport mentally and physically than tennis.
"They don't have time to enhance their intelligence" ?? And you think what I said is dumb ??
No doubt it is a tough sport, that requires incredible fitness and dedication, phenomenal athletes.
Anyone with a half a brain won't become a boxer. Next time you go to your doctor ask him or her what boxing does to your brain.
Find out how many children of professional people become professional boxers and then ask yourself why it's so low.
The average person wouldn't play it even if it was cheap. It's too hard to learn. 99.9% of people who play the sport never even learn to serve properly. That includes over 90% who play at club level.
Most people can just pick up a basketball, or kick a soccer ball, and play that sport properly. Tennis takes years just to potentially get decent at. That turns people off.
In Canada, it's extremely hard to find people to play with. Milos Raonic said his serve is so good because, when he was younger, he couldn't find a hitting partner and so he'd just go serve tennis balls. I practice my serve several hours a week just for that reason. The people I play with don't want to play often. They don't take it seriously. It's a recreational activity like bowling or frisbee golf.
If the day comes that tennis tournaments are no longer held in arenas, but rather over secure wifi networks using thumbs and swipes, the biggest problem might just be attendance. People might not go.Never going to happen.
Too many braindead ghouls would rather walk around chasing Pokemon than practice hard and reap the lifelong rewards of having a nice plush one handed backhand.
That's counter to what I've heard about his parents... The broadcasters talk endlessly about that, and why he takes such a nuanced, analytical approach. I have heard that they hardly know the sport, though. I like the stories about him endlessly practicing solo (serving, ball machine, etc.).
I think the sport's a lot more accessible than most due to the low cost of entry, and ready availability of courts. A little hand-eye, strong wrist, some mobility... you're off.
Here's a conservative estimate of 6 months in serious tennis training:
3 pairs of decent shoes= $120-240
32 cans of balls= $120-180
12 change of strings= $300-500
Weekly 2 hour clinics: $480-520
That's give or take a grand or two in a 6 month span for basics. And I'm not including clothes, broken racquets, tournament fees, transportation or extra coaching here and there privately. For one kid.
If you have a family of two with three kids making about $100,000 after taxes, which is a good income all things considered, spending $10,000 on one kid's after-school activities is a bit much for most people. Disagree?
I'm of the opinion a parent shouldn't be expected to make sacrifices so their kid is able to develop athletically. If you have parent spending time with their children after work and on weekends concentrating on one sport and making sure they are in proper programs, that should be sufficient. Tennis itself is in no way cheap unless you're playing with shredded shoes, worn out strings and flat balls. Common now. Here's a conservative estimate of 6 months in serious tennis training:
3 pairs of decent shoes= $120-240
32 cans of balls= $120-180
12 change of strings= $300-500
Weekly 2 hour clinics: $480-520
That's give or take a grand or two in a 6 month span for basics. And I'm not including clothes, broken racquets, tournament fees, transportation or extra coaching here and there privately. For one kid.
If you have a family of two with three kids making about $100,000 after taxes, which is a good income all things considered, spending $10,000 on one kid's after-school activities is a bit much for most people. Disagree?
Wow where are you getting these prices from?
32 cans of balls $120??? You can buy a 24 can case of Penn for $60. Heck I can buy the exact same can of Penns from my local Walmart for $2/can!
12 change of strings $300+??? What are you stringing with? Buy a stringer if you want to save money, I did. You can buy packages of string for as little as $4 or entire reels 660 foot for as little as $17!!
2 hour clinic $500?? fancy stuff. All the pros in my area charge $50/hour for private lessons. If you pay up for packages you can get that rate down into the $36/hour range. I can do 1.5 hour drills for $12.
I think you are grossly over exaggerating costs to try and validate your opinion.
I'm of the opinion a parent shouldn't be expected to make sacrifices so their kid is able to develop athletically. If you have parent spending time with their children after work and on weekends concentrating on one sport and making sure they are in proper programs, that should be sufficient. Tennis itself is in no way cheap unless you're playing with shredded shoes, worn out strings and flat balls. Common now. Here's a conservative estimate of 6 months in serious tennis training:
3 pairs of decent shoes= $120-240
32 cans of balls= $120-180
12 change of strings= $300-500
Weekly 2 hour clinics: $480-520
That's give or take a grand or two in a 6 month span for basics. And I'm not including clothes, broken racquets, tournament fees, transportation or extra coaching here and there privately. For one kid.
If you have a family of two with three kids making about $100,000 after taxes, which is a good income all things considered, spending $10,000 on one kid's after-school activities is a bit much for most people. Disagree?