Same here. How much I would like the Alcaraz frame be the same as the stock VSmind sharing a photo or link, I looked at high res photos for a good while and come up empty.
Same here. How much I would like the Alcaraz frame be the same as the stock VSmind sharing a photo or link, I looked at high res photos for a good while and come up empty.
so then it goes back to the fact that we dont know his specs since he is using a pro-stock?The dimples/pimples are only on the retail models. Pro stock (babolat calls them competition) models, don’t have them. They’re current or old retail frames made to more stringent quality control standards. Often, no specs on them or slightly different graphics too. A friend used to work high up for babolat and has confirmed this to me and even gotten pro stock frames for me from them…
basically, nothing to see here folks. He’s using the new gen aero vs mold. They just don’t put pimples on the pro stocks.
Indeed, I think that is the right conclusion. "Based" on a current stock frame but certainly not the same. There are ever so slight differences on these photo's that just don't resemble my stock VS's. We have no idea of what is underneath the paint (that by the way also does not resemble the paint on my VS's, ever so slightly different in colour and gloss...).so then it goes back to the fact that we dont know his specs since he is using a pro-stock?
for instance I would expect to see the raised dot pattern in one of these:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
And in the previous paint
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
All I see are shadows and reflections of the strings in the area around the stripes in the inner hoop
Now the real question is, "What are the dimples for and why do our retail rackets have them? Does it provide us with extra Alcaraz magic?"
Babolat competition/pro stock models come at retail specs just with tighter qc. Not lighter like head racquets or some Wilson layups. Pretty safe to assume that’s what he has when considering the spec reports that are circulating. Of course, he could have lead under the bumper but honestly does it matter?so then it goes back to the fact that we dont know his specs since he is using a pro-stock?
All the marketing material initially for the “pure feel” was that the cortex/Pure feel was internal and not related to the pimples. Unless this has changed…It’s their “Pure Feel” dampening system. Also, it’s an “anti-counterfeit” too.
This thread is hilarious.
what condition? grip size? will you ship to Canada?Someone should buy mine, I’ve had a post up on the for sale section at a good price for a while with barely any interest![]()
This thread is exactly why they don't. This frame was barely selling and now, it will sell like crazy. Big money in "marketed perception".But, in another perspective, I hate that racquet companies are often dishonest to their customers. If Babolat admits that CA uses a prostock, I’d be 100% fine with it, it’s HIS racquet.
In the first pic there, I tried to see if there was "Cortex Pure Feel" listed above "Aero Modular" as seen in the retail models but I couldn't see it? Might make the case that he is playing without Cortex.
I have three PAVS. I found that I sometimes lost the feel of where the top of the racket was when returning serve.Following on my post above, adding the lead at the inner v throat (4 grams), made the racquet more difficult to handle and gave me some wrist discomfort, has anyone added lead at 12 only, like 4 grams? How was the racquet feeling?
Here's some food for thought. I currently have 2 Pure Aero VS, both uncustomized. They are currently strung with a Tecnifibre poly. One racket is SW328, the second racket is SW304. Keep in mind these are strung measurements.
It's most likely that he does have lead at 12 on his racket, not necessarily to increase the SW very high, but instead to at least match each of his racket to one another. So some rackets will have slightly more lead, some slightly less lead. It is much easier to add 2 in. of lead tape to match up the specs, than it is to manufacture the rackets all with the same exact specs.
All these questions on pro stock, dimples pimples, paint, etc, and TW is still putting Alcaraz under the regular Pure Aero section and not the VS?
He is now endorsing the Pure Aero 98, which is not yet released to the consumer market. But he doesn't use the Aero VS paintjob any more, so that's probably why they have him in the main Aero section.
They said it will have different materials, so it will be different
I've been thinking the same thing lately. Btw, love the avatar. I HAVE THE POWER!!!!!All these questions on pro stock, dimples pimples, paint, etc, and TW is still putting Alcaraz under the regular Pure Aero section and not the VS?
They also mentioned something about fiberglass fibers but could be a marketing moveIn the January 2023 release of the Pure Aero 98 (a replacement of the Pure Aero VS), the grommets are more cylindrical-shaped, so the string does not move as much. This allows for a focus on precision for the "fast spin" player.
Babolat's Updated Pure Aero Tennis Racket Line Introduces New Technologies, Flax (forbes.com)
give it a tryAnyone try 1.20mm strings in their PAVS?
I see this thread constantly pop-up in the pro player gear section and wonder to myself..This thread is hilarious.
Force = Mass x AccelerationIf Force = Mass x Velocity, if you have less mass you will need more velocity/RHS.
but I dont have itgive it a try
I've been thinking the same thing lately. Btw, love the avatar. I HAVE THE POWER!!!!!
Looks like one piece stringing on this pictureIt seems like Alcaraz is playing a racket (before and current) without the Cortex "dimples". What are your thoughts?
yep, not anymore but back in 2020 when he was 17 years old he was.All pure aero vs in stock form have DIMPLES, Alcaraz's Pure aero VS has no DIMPLES, SO the answer of that big question is simple, maybe he's using a pure aero vs with lower specs ( or not ) etc etc etc...., but guys he's not using the pure aero vs we find in stores !
With heavy racquet you use the inertia of it, not force...Force = Mass x Acceleration
What this also means is that with the same force, a lighter object will accelerate faster. Intuitively you know this, the heavier the object, the more force you need to accelerate it
Note sure if someone pointed this out before but I count only 19 crosses in this picture?