"An Evaluation of High Dose Vitamin D in Rheumatoid Arthritis," Journal of Clinical Rheumatology, 2014. In summary the vitamin D made the disease process worse and the patients' functional abilities were shown to deteriorate.
Your "High does Vitamin D trial" paper in reality tested minuscule Vitamin D doses : less than 4700 UI/day - 10 to 70 times lower than used by Dr Coimbra/and 3 times lower than one naturally makes when going out in the sun- !
A common malpractice tool used in bogus scientific studies looking to discredit any new medical breakthrough threatening established profits !
As a result of this low supplementation, their Vitamin D levels at the end of the 1 year trial were barely above 30 ng/mL !
Realize the official levels indicating deficiency are: less than 20 ng/mL , while insufficiency levels are: less than 30 ng/mL !!
No wonder they found no effect.
These people were actually barely Vitamin D sufficient.
That's what you call a sham trial, used by big pharma to fool unsuspecting everyday folks like yourself.
Proof from your paper:
" The research pharmacy randomized eligible subjects using a 1:1 block to placebo or
vitamin D2 50,000 IU 3 times weekly for 4 weeks, then 50,000 IU twice monthly for 11 months."
If you add it up, that's 4 x 150.000 UI added to 100.000 UI x 11, which adds up to 1.700.000 UI for a full year, or less than 4700 UI/day.
Where it really gets ridiculous is anyone standing in the sun between the months of april and october at 11.00 - 14.00 for 15 min and with 2/3 of their skin exposed will make in their skin 15.000 UI for that day.
And these researchers have the gall to call their trial "High dose Vitamin D".
Welcome to the real, profit-driven world.