CAS exonerates Russian athletes of doping allegations

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
The reality is, as I've said all along, that most of the accusations of Russian doping can't and won't stand up in a properly-convened court and so it proves:

The International Olympic Committee has reacted with dismay after 28 Russian athletes had their lifetime bans from the Olympics dramatically overturned by the court of arbitration for sport and warned that the ruling could have serious consequences for the fight against doping.

As Russia’s sports ministry celebrated the decision, saying that “justice had finally triumphed”, the IOC was bracing itself for a fresh legal challenge from some of the athletes who now want to compete in the Winter Olympics in Pyeongchang which begin next Friday.

Cas’s ruling also means the 28 will have their results reinstated from the 2014 Winter Olympics, returning Russia to the top of the medal table. They include the skeleton medallists Alexander Tretyakov and Elena Nikitina, who have already indicated they want to compete in Pyeongchang.

Aleksandra Brilliantova, the head of the Russian Olympic Committee’s (ROC) legal department, indicated an appeal to the IOC is imminent. “We were counting on a fair Cas decision and are very pleased that it turned out to be so,” she said. “We will now send an appeal to the IOC with a request to consider the issue of inviting those athletes in respect of which there is a positive Cas decision.”

The ROC remains suspended from Pyeongchang because of state-sponsored doping in Sochi. However, as things stand, around 160 Russians have been granted permission to compete as “neutral” athletes under the banner of Olympic Athlete from Russia after being cleared of doping by an IOC anti-doping panel.

That figure could yet rise, although for now the IOC is insisting it will not automatically allow any of the Russians cleared by Cas late entry into the Games. “The result of the Cas decision does not mean that athletes from the group of 28 will be invited,” it said in a statement. “Not being sanctioned does not automatically confer the privilege of an invitation.”
 
IOC is the most corrupte group in the world, they make african warlords look like mother theresa
 
The IOC is slightly above average in the corruption stakes at the present time, but hardly the worst.

In any event, an independent judicial body made the decision and not the IOC, so you misread once again.

IOC is the most corrupte group in the world, they make african warlords look like mother theresa
 
Last edited:
The Russians are not trustworthy people. They'll just find another illegal substance to abuse before that gets banned. Then they'll play dumb saying someone spiked their drink at a rave.
 
Doping in Russian sports has a systemic nature. Russia has had 51 Olympic medals stripped for doping violations – the most of any country, four times the number of the runner-up, and more than a third of the global total
 
Do you have a list from a reputable source?

Quantity does not by itself mean systemic.

Outsourcing doping to the private sector does not make it right either.

Doping in Russian sports has a systemic nature. Russia has had 51 Olympic medals stripped for doping violations – the most of any country, four times the number of the runner-up, and more than a third of the global total
 
Last edited:
https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/8ec16a0c-5da4-4ef1-900a-cf87efc35aab

8ec16a0c-5da4-4ef1-900a-cf87efc35aab_text_hi.gif
 
So despite being legally exonerated, the IOC made the political decision to ignore the legal process and ban them from the Olympics anyway.
 
Coming from a different angle I'm not happy in the way people and/or organisations can smear individuals without evidence or proof in any matter these days.
People's lives can be destroyed as mud sticks. I think before someone is branded this or that, any matter should be put to the courts and then once a verdict is made, then the situation can be reported. Both social media and conventional media tend not to do this damaging the lives of many.
 
Back
Top