CHAMPIONS CHAT | Pete Sampras & Novak Djokovic

USO

Hall of Fame
Anyways the difference between Pete Sampras and Novak Djokovic is that Pete was clearly the best of his era while Novak is the third best of his era trailing two other players. They cannot be compared.
 
Anyways the difference between Pete Sampras and Novak Djokovic is that Pete was clearly the best of his era while Novak is the third best of his era trailing two other players. They cannot be compared.
You're right, comparing an all-court player with a servebot who couldn't even reach FO finale is futile.

And Novak won 17 slams.

And what you said implies that if Sampras had no serious competition then why didn't he win 26 slams? He won less than Novak despite being in a GOAT-vacuum.
 
Anyways the difference between Pete Sampras and Novak Djokovic is that Pete was clearly the best of his era while Novak is the third best of his era trailing two other players. They cannot be compared.
You literally just compared them.
No I did not. I just explained why they cannot be compared by giving the reason.
A thread about Djokovic? Count USO to be there to make a f00l out of himself/herself.
Always a pleasure to behold.
 

Eren

Professional
"6 years in a row, Pete, I don't know how you did it."

Servebot era on very fast courts and speedy balls, racket technology not yet there to allow for better returning, no other GOAT-like contenders on a regular basis. That's how.
:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D

Admirable dedication to slam the Pete Sampras.
 

Shaolin

G.O.A.T.
Notice to Nadal fanatics:

Novak himself is here commenting that it is the ''5th biggest tournament next to the slams''.

Oh wait, its just an exo :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 

demrle

Professional
Anyways the difference between Pete Sampras and Novak Djokovic is that Pete was clearly the best of his era while Novak is the third best of his era trailing two other players. They cannot be compared.
 
Last edited:
Top