Razer
G.O.A.T.
5 of the 9 slams are on clay. Nadal is GOAT on clay plus an early bloomer who got ahead start at winning slam over a late bloomer Djokovic. Djokovic can't win anything in Federer's generation(except mono Fed at the 2008 AO), because every gate was guarded at all 4 slams. It's also worth mention that Federer faced a better version of Nadal on clay than Djokovic did in his own generation.
Nadal early career achievement is an anomaly so you can't paint the same picture for every players on the tour. You cherry pick certain year to suit your argument, but of course leave out many details
Djokodal are in the same generation. Since 2010, both players have won the vast majority of the slams because they are only 1 year apart.
Also comparing Murray to Nadal is a dumb analogy. Of course Nadal will have way more slams than Murray because he's a greater/better player, regardless if they are at the same age or 6 years apart.
I disagree.
Federer was the best player during his peak/prime years and if you put him in any other generation I can see him dominate like he use to. Perhaps even more since Nadal isn't goating on clay in which he owns all surfaces throughout the year. Djokovic had to wait until Federer decline and Nadal wasn't as dominant on clay and got worse on grass.
Both Federer/Nole are late bloomer. Federer's breakout year was starting 2004 and Nole was starting 2011. That's 7 years apart !
Between 2003-2010:
Federer - 16 slams
Nole - 1 slam*
Between 2011 - present:
Federer - 3
Nole - 21
Nole's breakthrough year was 2008, Federer's was 03, they were ranked in top 10 for the first time in 07 and 02 respectively, that is only 5 years apart, Nadal made a breakthough into top 10 in 2005 itself, so these people are in the same range. Novak struggling in 09-10 is his own problem, physical issue, gluten etc etc, that cannot be an excuse to put them in different generations. Roger won same number of non clay slams as Nadal in 2010s decade, he would have actually won more than Nadal if Novak did no exist. Roger was a bit declined but not as declined as you think. He became really declined and bad after 2017. While he certanly was not in his prime (even though he claims in 2015 that he is in his prime) he was not that declined. In 2015 Roger had a higher games dominance ratio in slams than Novak, he just was beaten by novak, otherwise he could have won 2015W, 2015USO and 2016AO, a hattrick of slams was his.