To be fair, there's no way the umpire could have definitively seen that at real speed. The issue here is the lack of replay.Can't believe a worthless l@rd@ss can single-handedly affect the ending of such an encounter between two world-class athletes.
And PS I was rooting for Draper, but this was just awful.
And by the way, yeah, Draper TOTALLY knew.
If you look on the replay he actually tried to hit it again after it bounced off the court.I can’t blame Draper, but he’s completely dodging the question in this post match interview. He without a doubt knew
Draper can’t make that call. It’s directly below him. There’s zero chance he could tell. It’s happening in a microsecond.
Disagree. Did you see him in the post-match interview? Completely dodged the question of what he thought happened. Every tennis player from probably the high school level and up would know whether or not they hit the ball before it hit the ground, let alone pros. Their touch and feel is world class, they can perceive the minute differences in spin and angle through their racketDraper can’t make that call. It’s directly below him. There’s zero chance he could tell. It’s happening in a microsecond.
To be fair, there's no way the umpire could have definitively seen that at real speed. The issue here is the lack of replay.
I think he definitely know it’s possible. But I don’t think he would cheat if he definitively knew it was a double bounce.Come on. Again, Draper isn't obligated to call it, but he could totally tell. He even gave a sheepish grin afterwards.
Disagree. Did you see him in the post-match interview? Completely dodged the question of what he thought happened. Every tennis player from probably the high school level and up would know whether or not they hit the ball before it hit the ground, let alone pros. Their touch and feel is world class, they can perceive the minute differences in spin and angle through their racket
Can’t believe it took them 5 minutes to get us that close up shot. What were they, going through floppy disks to get it? Insane
I think he definitely know it’s possible. But I don’t think he would cheat if he definitively knew it was a double bounce.
My wife watched it three times in slow motion before she saw the double bounce. Idk.
Good point.I'm assuming they intentionally didn't want to show it until after the controversy at the net was fully "resolved", since the video would not be admitted as evidence...
It’s definitely on the umpire, I don’t hold it against Draper in a moral sense. I just think he knewNot necessarily. Things happen fast and you can't always be sure what happened but he did offer to replay the point. However the umpire wouldn't back down. Blame him.
I think he definitely know it’s possible. But I don’t think he would cheat if he definitively knew it was a double bounce.
My wife watched it three times in slow motion before she saw the double bounce. Idk.
Not much of a chance thereZverev also has a chance to become number two.
Not much of a chance there
umm french open???It would make for a really weird year. Zverev (zero Slam finals) at #2, Alcaraz (two Slam titles) at #3, Djokovic (two Slam finals) #7.
Well what the hell lolWell , that's a lame excuse to not beat a washed up clownfils lol.
Numbers don’t lie. It’s like Djokovic being the goat for having 24 slams. He certainly has the numbers but it does feel weird. But again, numbers don’t lie.It would make for a really weird year. Zverev (zero Slam finals) at #2, Alcaraz (two Slam titles) at #3, Djokovic (two Slam finals) #7.
That is not the rule now, and it would be a terrible rule if implemented. Rulings made on the basis of shoulder shrugs, eye rolls, or sheepish grins? Please.Any half-competitive tennis player would know. Draper may have retained a tiny hypothetical percentage of doubt, but he knew with 99.9% certainty that he'd lost that point. In fact, his body language immediately after the fact, with the ball still in the air, TOTALLY gives it away. Which, by the way, only worsens the umpire's position, because even if he doesn't see the bounce, he should be able to make the JUDGMENT CALL just by interpreting the player's reaction.
There is no way he could have made that call at real speed with the naked eye. It took three replays, advanced frame by frame, significantly zoomed in to determine Draper trapped the ball. The lack of video replay is the issue here.Same Ump who screwed up the Fritz call last week. Dude has no idea what he is doing. And I think Draper knew exactly what happened
I disagree entirely. It was obvious from one replay, it was obvious in live time and if you had any concept as to how a ball bounces ob court it would have been obvious. Your bias shows clearlyThere is no way he could have made that call at real speed with the naked eye. It took three replays, advanced frame by frame, significantly zoomed in to determine Draper trapped the ball. The lack of video replay is the issue here.
It was far from obvious. It seems like you are the one with bias directed towards Allensworth. The issue here is the lack of video review on calls like this.I disagree entirely. It was obvious from one replay, it was obvious in live time and if you had any concept as to how a ball bounces ob court it would have been obvious. Your bias shows clearly
Consider me surprised if he does not. Tend to rate this loss as (almost) deliberate - similar to the match against Marozsan last year in Rome.By far the worst this year from him. May he regroup and show his level at the USO.
Also that Draper one at Queen's this year we tend to forget.Consider me surprised if he does not. Tend to rate this loss as (almost) deliberate - similar to the match against Marozsan last year in Rome.
Marozsan was on fire in that match.Consider me surprised if he does not. Tend to rate this loss as (almost) deliberate - similar to the match against Marozsan last year in Rome.
True. Monfils himself was playing like a retired corpse. A complete waste of time to watch that match personally, Tennis-wise.Marozsan was on fire in that match.
Marozsan was on fire in that match.
Fabian absolutely has the skills imo. It's the mentality that's sus. He's a beautiful player to watch when in flight.Watched him play this week in person. That kid is composed and focused. I am not sure he has the skills but he certainly has the mental makeup to be good.
The one that played outstanding in my mind was Etchavary (I am sure I misspelled). Similarly very focused except he backed it up with great skill
That match with Shelton was probably the best match I have ever seen in person. The house was rocking.
He effectively didn’t play Rio as he rolled his ankle. Honestly stop with the vitriol and the bashing. You didn’t expect Rafa to be A1 perfect every week of every season. It’s really tiresome how people have ridiculous expectations of players and slam them for not winning everything all the time.Rio R1 withdrawal
And he has been useless by HIS standards, he is an ATG material we're talking about, not Alexander Zverev or Stefanos Tsitsipas.
Get used to this. The big 3 all went through it and it will be no different for golden boy.He effectively didn’t play Rio as he rolled his ankle. Honestly stop with the vitriol and the bashing. You didn’t expect Rafa to be A1 perfect every week of every season. It’s really tiresome how people have ridiculous expectations of players and slam them for not winning everything all the time.
And now a loss against Clownfils. Just when we thought his BO3 shenanigans couldn't get any worse.He effectively didn’t play Rio as he rolled his ankle. Honestly stop with the vitriol and the bashing. You didn’t expect Rafa to be A1 perfect every week of every season. It’s really tiresome how people have ridiculous expectations of players and slam them for not winning everything all the time.
This is honestly one of the, if not the most cringe term used on this platform, fella.The world no1 and best player in the world is on court! Earths mightiest warrior!
To be fair you called it spot on again sir. You said why is everyone going for golden boy in thread and then he crashed out. A great prediction by you brotherAnd now a loss against Clownfils. Just when we thought his BO3 shenanigans couldn't get any worse.
He seriously needs to man up and treat BO3 with seriousness as well; he is not a 35 year old veteran who has the mileage, and therefore luxury to treat the non slams as mere warmups or non serious events.
It is but us Djokovic fans run with it. Sorry brotherThis is honestly one of the, if not the most cringe term used on this platform, fella.