Cincinnati - the real Slam
- Thread starter sureshs
- Start date
Andres
G.O.A.T.
There is. There are 120 members.
flyinghippos101
Legend
This thread is epic, it must not die!
P_Agony
Banned
It will not.
Rafa better be winning tonight, otherwise Roger can never win his third YEC.
Also, Roger won 3 out of 5 slams this year, so he's a fair Year end champion
No, he only beat Rafa twice at YEC, therefore he has only won two 'real' YEC, according to the almighty Suresh.
P_Agony
Banned
Huh? Why not?
According to Suresh, Cincy turned out not to be the fifth Slam, because Federer didn't have to play Nadal (a great defence from Suresh of course). Since Fed only played Nadal here twice, his YEC's of 2006 and 2007 can't be matched if Rafa goes out.
P_Agony
Banned
Hmm, I could see how that argument would make sense for someone like Suresh. I love her/his threads though, because they are either comedy gold or the opposite of what's written in them happens.
This one is both
I love you.
djokovicgonzalez2010
G.O.A.T.
It took me so long to find this
malakas
Banned
Fed agrees with OP
Sureshs is just a misunderstood genious!
http://www.australianopen.com/en_AU/news/interviews/2010-01-31/201001311264858828906.html
Sureshs is just a misunderstood genious!
kOaMaster
Hall of Fame
djokovicgonzalez2010
G.O.A.T.
abmk
Bionic Poster
yep, we are just mere mortals who fail to understand the meaning and depth of sureshs' threads/posts
djokovicgonzalez2010
G.O.A.T.
agreed epic
djokovicgonzalez2010
G.O.A.T.
Does he have 17 or 18 slams?
Rabbit
Talk Tennis Guru
fantom
Hall of Fame
djokovicgonzalez2010
G.O.A.T.
Well... he was...
J
Jchurch
Guest
NO ONE WILL EVER TOP FEDERER'S SLAM COUNT! How can they talk about Borg and Laver? THEY NEVER WON THE REAL SLAM
ProgressoR
Hall of Fame
My take is sureshs is hardly bothered about Fed winning or losing, but finds it too easy to stoke up you lot. I am surprised that adults (I presume not all the posters are kids) can get so riled up about some gentle ribbing about Fed, nadal or whomever.
It seems to me a lot of posters on this thread need to get a grip, more of a life, and realise if someone is gently taking the mick out of something, its hardly a life or death matter. Reacting to that like someone has stolen your car is pretty immature.
And to take pleasure (with such passion) in the OP being wrong (I think he was expecting to be wrong anyway, or not that bothered if he turned out to be wrong) really shows a terminal lack of humour here.
chill.
It seems to me a lot of posters on this thread need to get a grip, more of a life, and realise if someone is gently taking the mick out of something, its hardly a life or death matter. Reacting to that like someone has stolen your car is pretty immature.
And to take pleasure (with such passion) in the OP being wrong (I think he was expecting to be wrong anyway, or not that bothered if he turned out to be wrong) really shows a terminal lack of humour here.
chill.
KAndersonFan
Semi-Pro
Classic
flyinghippos101
Legend
Don't you worry, I'm sure this thread is on the favorites list of many users here...
Dilettante
Hall of Fame
This is just classic.
BTW, this whole thread is classic.
Suresh is an Artist.
kaleidoskope
Professional
Even newbies bump it up...
KAndersonFan
Semi-Pro
Dilettante
Hall of Fame
D
Deleted member 21996
Guest
i I3< @ at this thread....
J
Jchurch
Guest
If Cincy is the real slam, then Fed leads Murray 2-0 in the slam H2H
Now he is 3-0. Poor Murray can't even beat Federer at any slam(real or delusional)
dropshot winner
Hall of Fame
That's hardly news, Federer is done since 2007. And Nadal is getting back to form since at least Cincinatti 2009.
djokovicgonzalez2010
G.O.A.T.
^ You think Nadal will lose on clay? 0.o
swordtennis
G.O.A.T.
Federer won it so it is null and void with these creepy types. Now when Nadal wins it it will be valid. One of these times they will get it right. Thankfully these humanoids are not the ones writing the history books of tennis.
W
woodrow1029
Guest
Thought it would be a good time of the year to bump this one up.
