Clay champions in this Nadal era

[PeoplesChamp]

lol
Djoker did all the hard work for fed and tired out Nadal isn't it . Madrid is still the longest 3 set clay match and one of the greatest matches .
Jumping over fed breaking Nadal's 34 match win streak is like Djoker ending Nadal's 5 RG streak in 2015 , it's versus a tired or out of form Nadal

Also , at RG both Novak in 2016 and fed at 2009 didn't face Nadal . cancel both .

Nadal was winning left and right.

Barcelona, MC, Rome, and in the finals of Madrid. 2009 Nadal would make 2015 Nadal cry in front of Uncle Toni. Get outta here

 

[maratha_warrior]

Nadal was winning left and right.

Barcelona, MC, Rome, and in the finals of Madrid. 2009 Nadal would make 2015 Nadal cry in front of Uncle Toni. Get outta here

If Nadal was winning left and right in 2009 , then " only Djokovic " was fighting him all through the clay season everywhere . Lol

Fed lost to Wawrinka in Montecarlo 2009 , Djokovic Reached finals and lost to Nadal .

Fed lost to " Djokovic " in Rome Masters 2009 ,
Djokovic reached finals and lost to Nadal .

At Madrid , Djoker lost to Nadal on semis and gave the Greatest 3 set match ever . hahaha

So Djoker who was defeating everyone left and right and lost only one match on clay in 2015 that too in final of RG, is worthless , but Roger who lost to Wawrinka in Montecarlo and lost to kid Djokovic in Rome in 2009 is a champ on clay ?? hahaha
Atleast don't show double standards so openly

If RG win of Djoker gets cancelled , then RG win of Roger definately gets cancelled too .

And everyone knows Rafa was tired after playing the greatest 3 set match on clay in Madrid 09 . wow what a match

 

[PeoplesChamp]

If Nadal was winning left and right in 2009 , then " only Djokovic " was fighting him all through the clay season everywhere . Lol

Fed lost to Wawrinka in Montecarlo 2009 , Djokovic Reached finals and lost to Nadal .

Fed lost to " Djokovic " in Rome Masters 2009 ,
Djokovic reached finals and lost to Nadal .

At Madrid , Djoker lost to Nadal on semis and gave the Greatest 3 set match ever . hahaha

So Djoker who was defeating everyone left and right and lost only one match on clay in 2015 that too in final of RG, is worthless , but Roger who lost to Wawrinka in Montecarlo and lost to kid Djokovic in Rome in 2009 is a champ on clay ?? hahaha
Atleast don't show double standards so openly

If RG win of Djoker gets cancelled , then RG win of Roger definately gets cancelled too .

And everyone knows Rafa was tired after playing the greatest 3 set match on clay in Madrid 09 . wow what a match

Thanks for making 2009 sound like the greatest year ever! LMAO!

 

[PeoplesChamp]

Djokovic got spanked in 2009 LOL

 

[maratha_warrior]

Thanks for making 2009 sound like the greatest year ever! LMAO!

more like lucky draw year lol
have no arguments to make haha

when one cancels out Djokers clay titles , but refuse to cancel feds titles , that's pure hypocrisy .

 

[maratha_warrior]

fed got spanked by Djokovic In 2009 Rome actually and lost hahaha

 

[PeoplesChamp]

more like lucky draw year lol
have no arguments to make haha

when one cancels out Djokers clay titles , but refuse to cancel feds titles , that's pure hypocrisy .

Effing Peak Nadal vs Sheet Nadal

I'll take the former.

 

[maratha_warrior]

Effing Peak Nadal vs Sheet Nadal

I'll take the former.

SODERLING faced Nadal in 2009 at RG

 

[PeoplesChamp]

fed got spanked by Djokovic In 2009 Rome actually and lost hahaha

Yea and then lost to friggin Kohlschreiber in straights at FO while Fed collected a career slam sealing his GOATHOOD.

 

[PeoplesChamp]

Federer = Djokovic on clay.

End of.

 

[Crisp]

how many times did these title holders also get beaten by nail on clay or vice versa

 

[maratha_warrior]

Yea and then lost to friggin Kohlschreiber in straights at FO while Fed collected a career slam sealing his GOATHOOD.

So what , Djoker was no peak In 2009 and lost at RG , and still defeated fed in Rome clay .

Fed met Soderling and won RG . ( no rafa )
Novak met Andy and won RG . ( no Rafa )

 

[maratha_warrior]

Federer = Djokovic on clay.

End of.

Fed >= Djokovic at RG .

Djoker > Fed at clay Masters .

If Fed had 10 masters on clay and Djoker had 6 masters , would fed fans Consider Djoker equal to Fed on clay masters ??

 

[PeoplesChamp]

Fed >= Djokovic at RG .

Djoker > Fed at clay Masters .

If Fed had 10 masters on clay and Djoker had 6 masters , would fed fans Consider Djoker equal to Fed on clay masters ??

Extra RG final for Fed.

Federer > Djokovic at RG

 

[maratha_warrior]

Extra RG final for Fed.

Federer > Djokovic at RG

ok , so Rafa beat Djoker in semis and beats Fed in finals and then Fed > Djoker .

I hope so Djoker reaches one more RG Final .

 

[jarko111]

Remember when Andreiev beat him on clay during his (Nadals) slow and steady rise to King of Clay status. I’ll always remember that match

 

[Tennis_Freak99]

I agree that everything should be considered valid, but why are we in the business of calling every era that isn't literally the strongest era of all time (08-13) a "weak era?" Why are we this cynical?

I think it's human nature too se everything in binary extremes, Black and White, Strong and Weak. Sad but true

 

[uscwang]

All together:
Nadal 37! (61% of 61)
Djokovic 11 (18%)
Federer 5 (8%) (+2 Hamburg B. N., before Nadal's Era)
Stan/Murray/Zverev 2, Robredo/Fognini 1 (total 13%)

So Nadal, Stan, Murray, Zverev, and Fognini are all in the same half in RG 2020.

 

[uscwang]

Updated on 10/11/2020

Nadal has his dynasty on clay since 2005, and has won the majority of big clay titles.

From 2005 to 2020 RG,
RG: Nadal 13, Federer/Wawrinka/Djokovic 1
MC: Nadal 11, Djokovic 2, Wawrinka/Fognini 1
Hamburg(2005-2008)/Madrid(2009-present): Nadal 5, Federer 4, Djokovic 3, Robredo/Murray/Zverev 1
Rome: Nadal 9, Djokovic 5, Murray/Zverev 1

All together:
Nadal 38! (61% of 62)
Djokovic 11 (18%)
Federer 5 (8%) (+2 Hamburg B. N.)
Stan/Murray/Zverev 2, Robredo/Fognini 1 (total 13%)