Comparing TWU string database vs Racketpedia

happyandbob

Legend
I bought a subscription to the racketpedia DB to compare their string performance data* to the TWU professor's data. (* I know that RP claims their data is based on lab tests, but their site has scant details on what the tests are and what the 0-100 ratings actually represent)

I thought tension maintenance might be the most straightforward measurement and perhaps the one likely to have the best alignment so started there. RP tracks every metric on a 0-100 index, so I converted the TWU metric "Tension Loss Pct" into a percentile for each string based on all the percent tension loss measurements in the TWU database. (e.g. Babolat RPM Blast 16 has 45.9% tension loss, which corresponds to 21st percentile among all TWU strings for tension maintenance)

Comparing some selected strings between the two on tension maintenance:

StringRP "Tension holding"StringTWU "Tension Loss" Percentile (higher is better)
Ashaway MonoGut ZX 12760Ashaway MonoGut ZX 16
16​
Babolat VS Touch Natural 130100Babolat VS Natural ThermoGut 16 Touch
88​
Head Velocity MLT Natural 12590Head Velocity MLT 17 (1.25)
97​
Isospeed Cream Beige 12880IsoSpeed Cream 17 (1.28)
59​
Kirschbaum Max Power Grey 12590Kirschbaum Max Power 17 (1.25)
71​
Msv Focus HEX Black 118100MSV Focus Hex 17L (1.18)
60​
Msv Focus HEX Black 12390MSV Focus-Hex 16 (1.23)
55​
Solinco Confidential Black 130100Solinco Confidential 16 (1.30)
75​
Solinco Hyper-G Green 12095Solinco Hyper-G 17 (1.20)
64​
Solinco Outlast Red 120100Solinco Outlast 17
11​
Solinco Revolution Blue 12095Solinco Revolution 17
12​
Tecnifibre Black Code 4S Black 12585Tecnifibre Black Code 4S 17 (1.25)
58​
Tecnifibre Multifeel Natural 12560Tecnifibre Multi-Feel 17 (1.25)
80​
Tecnifibre Multifeel Natural 13075Tecnifibre Multi-Feel 16
78​
Yonex Poly Tour Pro Yellow 12570Yonex Poly Tour Pro Yellow 16L (1.25)
20​

There are a few strings that seem aligned, but really it's all over the place. The first thing I wonder is if RP is rating strings only compared to other like strings -- e.g. does RP consider Focus Hex to be a 100 at holding tension vs all other poly strings? Second thing is how much color seems to impact tension maintenance. Is the difference between the RP tension maintenance due to RP testing black Focus Hex and TWU testing an alternate color. There are color differences in tension maintenance even in the TWU database where Multifeel 16 is 78th percentile for tension maintenance but Multifeel Black is 90th percentile.

Seems crazy though. RP thinks Solinco Outlast 17 is 100 for tension maintenance, but TWU tests show it holds tension terribly at the 11th percentile.
 
Last edited:

swish41

Rookie
I bought a subscription to the racketpedia DB to compare their string performance data* to the TWU professor's data. (* I know that RP claims their data is based on lab tests, but their site has scant details on what the tests are and what the 0-100 ratings actually represent)

I thought tension maintenance might be the most straightforward measurement and perhaps the one likely to have the best alignment so started there. RP tracks every metric on a 0-100 index, so I converted the TWU metric "Tension Loss Pct" into a percentile for each string based on all the percent tension loss measurements in the TWU database. (e.g. Babolat RPM Blast 16 has 45.9% tension loss, which corresponds to 21st percentile among all TWU strings for tension maintenance)

Comparing some selected strings between the two on tension maintenance:

StringRP "Tension holding"StringTWU "Tension Loss" Percentile
Ashaway MonoGut ZX 12760Ashaway MonoGut ZX 16
16​
Babolat VS Touch Natural 130100Babolat VS Natural ThermoGut 16 Touch
88​
Head Velocity MLT Natural 12590Head Velocity MLT 17 (1.25)
97​
Isospeed Cream Beige 12880IsoSpeed Cream 17 (1.28)
59​
Kirschbaum Max Power Grey 12590Kirschbaum Max Power 17 (1.25)
71​
Msv Focus HEX Black 118100MSV Focus Hex 17L (1.18)
60​
Msv Focus HEX Black 12390MSV Focus-Hex 16 (1.23)
55​
Solinco Confidential Black 130100Solinco Confidential 16 (1.30)
75​
Solinco Hyper-G Green 12095Solinco Hyper-G 17 (1.20)
64​
Solinco Outlast Red 120100Solinco Outlast 17
11​
Solinco Revolution Blue 12095Solinco Revolution 17
12​
Tecnifibre Black Code 4S Black 12585Tecnifibre Black Code 4S 17 (1.25)
58​
Tecnifibre Multifeel Natural 12560Tecnifibre Multi-Feel 17 (1.25)
80​
Tecnifibre Multifeel Natural 13075Tecnifibre Multi-Feel 16
78​
Yonex Poly Tour Pro Yellow 12570Yonex Poly Tour Pro Yellow 16L (1.25)
20​

There are a few strings that seem aligned, but really it's all over the place. The first thing I wonder is if RP is rating strings only compared to other like strings -- e.g. does RP consider Focus Hex to be a 100 at holding tension vs all other poly strings? Second thing is how much color seems to impact tension maintenance. Is the difference between the RP tension maintenance due to RP testing black Focus Hex and TWU testing an alternate color. There are color differences in tension maintenance even in the TWU database where Multifeel 16 is 78th percentile for tension maintenance but Multifeel Black is 90th percentile.

Seems crazy though. RP thinks Solinco Outlast 17 is 100 for tension maintenance, but TWU tests show it holds tension terribly at the 11th percentile.
If I understand correctly according to TW data outlast is the best tension holder string in the sheet, followed by revolution. I mean, just %11 loss is pretty impressive. Am I completely wrong?
 

happyandbob

Legend
If I understand correctly according to TW data outlast is the best tension holder string in the sheet, followed by revolution. I mean, just %11 loss is pretty impressive. Am I completely wrong?
no, the exact opposite actually. I converted the TW percent loss data into a percentile meaning 99th percentile is the best tension holding string in their database. Outlast is one of the worst at holding tension in their database -- Outlast 17 lost 50.4% of its tension after their testing, one of the highest loss percentages of any string.

Meanwhile, according to RP outlast is one of the best at holding tension
 
Last edited:
Top