Thomas johansson > Ferrer ?21 > 17
Nadal never broke 1 season?Consecutive seasons at over 10,000 ATP points:
Djokovic 6 (2011-16)
Federer 4 (2004-07)
Nadal 0
What does it tell us?
He never had two seasons in a row at over 10k points:Nadal never broke 1 season?
What does it tell us?
So?He never had two seasons in a row at over 10k points:
2008
2010
2013
2017
It tells us that Nadal faced a serious injury every other year.Consecutive seasons at over 10,000 ATP points:
Djokovic 6 (2011-16)
Federer 4 (2004-07)
Nadal 0
What does it tell us?
And an even more serious injury during the others.It tells us that Nadal faced a serious injury every other year.
So Nadal did not dominate consecutive years like Djokovic and Federer did.
So Nadal did not dominate consecutive years like Djokovic and Federer did.
Winning RG is not dominating tennis.is 8 > 13?
or perhaps 17 > 20?
where did Novak dominate? at Mickey Mouse level of tournaments?
Winning RG is not dominating tennis.
Clay is a valid surface in tennis, clay denialism is pseudological.Winning RG is not dominating tennis.
So you think that winning 20 RGs has the same value as winning 20 slams in a row?Clay is a valid surface in tennis, clay denialism is pseudological.
Winning RG 13 times and the USO 4 times in a decade with a leading H2H at the event over your main rival is domination of tennis. Winning 3 Slams on different surfaces the same calendar year (something nobody else has ever done) is domination of tennis. Having a winning H2H at Slams over your main rivals is domination of tennis.
All members of the Big 3 have dominated tennis in different ways. Nadal had his own particular method of domination, he doesn't need to follow the same path of the other two.
So you think that winning 20 RGs has the same value as winning 20 slams in a row?
Why are you asking me? I compare players of the same era only.do you think that winning all GS titles from baseline on slowed down surfaces with high bounce has same value as winning RG from baseline and Wim by S&V multiple times?
Djokovic has more years end at #1, nearly as many weeks at #1 as Roger and many more than Nadal, has held all 4 slams at one time, has won all masters at least twice which is something that neither Roger or Rafa have done even once. I believe that Roger and Rafa have won more 250 point tournaments than Novak. Oh, and Rafa have 20 slams, not 21.would you be so kind and explain how it's possible that Novak dominated tennis more if:
1. He has less weeks at #1 than Fed
2. He has less GS than both Fed and Nadal
by collecting points at Mickey Mouse tournaments?![]()
Thomas johansson > Ferrer ?
Djokovic has more years end at #1, nearly as many weeks at #1 as Roger and many more than Nadal, has held all 4 slams at one time, has won all masters at least twice which is something that neither Roger or Rafa have done even once. I believe that Roger and Rafa have won more 250 point tournaments than Novak. Oh, and Rafa have 20 slams, not 21.
Nadal missed 2003 French Open.Consecutive seasons at over 10,000 ATP points:
Djokovic 6 (2011-16)
Federer 4 (2004-07)
Nadal 0
What does it tell us?
Nothing relevant that we no longer know!Consecutive seasons at over 10,000 ATP points:
Djokovic 6 (2011-16)
Federer 4 (2004-07)
Nadal 0
What does it tell us?
It tells us that Djokovic is the third greatest player of the current era, behind Federer and Nadal.
He never had two seasons in a row at over 10k points:
2008
2010
2013
2017
Consecutive seasons at over 10,000 ATP points:
Djokovic 6 (2011-16)
Federer 4 (2004-07)
Nadal 0
What does it tell us?
NCYGS all 4 slams win in a row defeating ATGs Federer and MurrayIt tells us that Djokovic is the third greatest player of the current era, behind Federer and Nadal.
NCYGS all 4 slams win in a row defeating ATGs Federer and Murray
Double golden masters
Tied most YE#1
Weeks at number 1 record in the bag
Most prize money won ever
Highest ELO ever
Strongest era ever dominated since 2011
Owned both main rivals H2H and dominated across all surfaces
ouch/thread
ouch
This was the exact start of the new hyper inflation era so no, no ouch lol
With the lights out, it’s let’s dangerous. Here we are now - entertain us!!!
Sinner has entered for the first time and likely will go to 11000 something. Can he replicate this?
This aged terribly/thread
Replicate this 10000 pts season next year? Who said 6 or anything?No he can't! Let's not get ahead of ourselves, Sinner had just one great season and let's leave it at that, doesn't necessary mean he can have 6 great seasons in a row...that's another ballpark...That's first and second, let's wait on his fate regarding his potential ban from the tour before we will be talking about any sort of records for him to begin with...
clay skew. AgreedAwful music
Replicate this 10000 pts season next year? Who said 6 or anything?
He missed Rome, Paris. Could have gone much deeper in RG and especially wimby. Lost pts in IW. Still may close the year at 12000.
Yes multiple years in a row over 10kHave you even read what this topic is about??...
100%. He has over 10000 even in his 30s. Fed and rafa were not close to it if I am right.Who has the most, total, out of everyone? Djokovic again?