That means the tension spring is still applying a pull on the string.
I use a dropweight.
I don't clamp while the bar is still dropping.
I only clamp when the bar remains at horizontal for 10 seconds.
Only if the bar is still dropping, how can it remain horizontal?
@ricardo I don’t think you understand how a lockout works.
First tension is set on the dial which compresses a tension spring that applies pressure on an arm connected to the gripper assembly.
Second as you rotate the crank tension on a string builds up and rotates the gripper assembly clockwise (CW.) At the same time the arm moves off its stop CW, compressing the tension spring more.
Third as the whole tension assembly moves away from the racket and tension reaches a set point the catch on the back releases a brake lever than actuated the brake. The brake holds a gear riding on the arm teeth from moving.
But that arm on the back of the gripper is still off it’s stop. The tension spring is still pushing on the arm which is trying to turn the gripper assembly CCW which is pulling on the string.
You’re welcome grasshopper.Thank you Master...
Only if the bar is still dropping, how can it remain horizontal?
And, mutatis mutandis, if the string is constantly stretching why the bar stands horizontal?
If you put a string in the gripper and pull on it the arm going from the gripper to the tension spring moves off the stop and compresses the spring. The string pushes the arm which pulls the string. That’s not science that’s common sense.The problem here is that Irvin is applying a scientific definition to the words "constantpull" rather than accounting for the common use of the words as used in regards to stringing machines.
If a LO pulls after lockout and an eCP constantly pulls, just not at a constant tension, what’s the difference? Correct me if I am wrong but an eCP (at least mine) pulls as the motor runs, then stops and holds the string until a load cell recognizes a specific tension drop, then the eCP pulls again. So if an eCP pulls and holds why is it called a constant pull and a LO that never stops pulling isn’t?a "constant pull" machine pulls at the desired tension, or rather applies a constant amount of force, until released. (yes I know it's not absolutely constant as it pulls, stops, and pulls more when it senses the tension drop)
If you put a string in the gripper and pull on it the arm going from the gripper to the tension spring moves off the stop and compresses the spring. The string pushes the arm which pulls the string. That’s not science that’s common sense.
EDIT: If I blow up a balloon, rest it on a table and press down on it the balloon pushes back. Same thing except in the case of the balloon there is no leverage action like with the arm connected to the gripper / tension spring in the LO.
No that is impossible. Well not impossible, you could install a load cell between the tension spring and the gripper arm to measure the pushing force in the arm. Then compute the force into tension applied on the string. If you want 60# and you have 57# turn the tension dial up to 63#.So it pulls. But does it continously pull to reference tension like the eCP?
Why the hostility? Take a chill pill dude! I never said I was an expert. Why the severe over reaction? Do you work for Prince? I merely asked the TW guy why they used a LO machine versus an ECP since I thought the ECP would of been much faster. I was surprised that the TW representative said the ECP was more accurate but less speedy than the LO. I stand behind my comment as that's the God's honest truth...that is what the guy said. So you attack me for that? Get a life! And no, the guy did not rush me off the phone. The mistake I made was forgetting to ask him to be more specific on the degree of inaccuracy that he experienced using a LO versus the ECP. Again, I never said that a ECP was more accurate than a LO.......the TW is the one who said that. Full disclosure: From my research, I'm still seriously thinking of buying a LO and not a ECP. So stick that where the sun don't shine pal......LOL!My guess is he lost patience with you and gave you ANY answer that he thought would allow him to get you off the phone since you obviously DON'T GET IT.
BOTH systems are accurate. Properly calibrated, a LO machine pulling at 60 lbs will pull 60 lbs accurately. Same for the CP machine. It isn't a question of accuracy. My recommendation....stay off the phone. Do more reading.
If a LO pulls after lockout and an eCP constantly pulls, just not at a constant tension, what’s the difference? Correct me if I am wrong but an eCP (at least mine) pulls as the motor runs, then stops and holds the string until a load cell recognizes a specific tension drop, then the eCP pulls again. So if an eCP pulls and holds why is it called a constant pull and a LO that never stops pulling isn’t?
I was surprised that the TW representative said the ECP was more accurate but less speedy than the LO.
Good question IMago, but I'm too much of a rookie to answer your question so I will defer to Irvin or another more experienced poster.What if you pull the crank very slowly, esp., in the last stage. Will the LO be more accurate?
ECP machines may not be true constant pull like a Swingway dropweight is, but they do their best to imitate it. (There may actually be true ECP machines I don't know how they work internally.)
an eCP (at least mine) pulls as the motor runs, then stops and holds the string until a load cell recognizes a specific tension drop, then the eCP pulls again.
Given the rush most pro stringers are clamping the string with after the tension is pulled, it makes no sense to buy an ECP...
If you put a string in the gripper and pull on it the arm going from the gripper to the tension spring moves off the stop and compresses the spring. The spring pushes the arm which pulls the string. That’s not science that’s common sense.
That's why I claimed in another thread ages ago, that a (Stringway) dropweight is the only "real" CP.
If this means the tensionhead is also moving back and forth, that would mean its overpulling/correcting/overpulling/etc. ≠ CProtating back and forth.
If this means the tensionhead is also moving back and forth, that would mean its overpulling/correcting/overpulling/etc. ≠ CP
What if you pull the crank very slowly, esp., in the last stage. Will the LO be more accurate?
IME, the faster the crank and then clamp off, the closer to Ref. Tension one will achieve.
Thanks. Care to explain why? My understanding is that the more time it takes to reach the LO point, the less string tension is lost, because until then, the tensioner is acting so to say in a CP mode. On the other hand, until you reach some critical tension (the yield point), there is no stretching (plastic deformation) of the string, so we can go this part of the way as fast as possible.
Their "defense" will be: we do this in a rythm, so results are consistent.
But I agree: clamping "on the beep" on an eCP comes close to using it as a LO
And @ricardo waiting 10 seconds after every pull? How long does it take to string an 18X20 racquet using this technique?
So it will take him an extra 6 minutes. No big deal for him, cause he knows he will get a predictable result which will last longer.
But I do realize there are faster methods to get same result (eg increase ref.tension)
you are a 4.5 player right?How long does the tension remain at/near the reference tension?
A string's performance depends on how stiff it is (http://twu.tennis-warehouse.com/learning_center/stringstiffness.php).
The only variable that you can control about a string's stiffness is tension.
The higher you tension, the stiffer the string becomes.
My goal is to ensure that the tension remains at/near the reference tension until I break my strings, usually at least a month.
I tension slowly. The dropweight bar should remain at horizontal for at least 10 seconds before I clamp.
I pre-stretch (https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/index.php?threads/pre-stretching-using-a-dw-tensioner.554225/).
I re-tension (https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/index.php?threads/how-to-re-tension-a-string.558504/#post-10154243).
So for me, accuracy is tension maintenance.
Accuracy is how long does the tension remain at or near the reference tension?
If one string job loses 50% tension after 24 hours of hitting and another string job loses only 10%,
then the 10% lose is more accurate.
On a good eCP (or dropweight) the string is never overstretched. Ref.tension --> quantity of stretch, plus a little influence of the tensioning time.as they have been "over-stretched" .
In other words if you string slowly with constant pull your stringbed feels significantly tighter afterwards. All the strings then have less stretchability left as they have been "over-stretched" ... unless you want them that way.
Another factor re the whole stringbed is that the strings on a typically oval racket are different lengths so the distance between the clamps varies a lot so the ratio of straight string v. string going out of and back into a grommet to the next straight string varies and friction affects this U-turn. It is all a very imperfect set up so it is amazing how accurately a good player in the zone can play.
tt.tennis-warehouse.com