Control (Low-Powered) Multis

ghetto3jon

New User
I've used synthetic gut exclusively (Prince, Gamma, Etc.), but I'm always looking for more control and less power (I like to swing away, but wrist issues prevent me from using ploys). I frequently read about "control" multis, and often reviewers mention how low-powered some of them are (Head Rip Control, Prince Premier Control, Wilson NXT Control, Etc.)…but I know multis are typically more-lively than synthetic gut. So are these "control" multis simply low-powered compared to traditional multis? Is moving from PSG to HRC or PPC a backwards move for someone hoping to find more control and less power?
 

SpinToWin

Talk Tennis Guru
Pro's Pro Clay Court Plus. Ultra cheap, fairly durable with good spin and very low powered for a Multi.
 

ghetto3jon

New User
Thanks for the suggestions, but I'm still left wondering: are all these "control, low powered" multis only low-powered compared to traditional multis (which are typically high powered)? Would they still be considered "low powered" when compared to synthetic gut? I'm curious if switching from synthetic gut to a "control multi" in hopes of getting less power is a silly move. (even these "control multis" appear less-stiff than synthetic gut according to the twu specs).
 

BorderLine

Rookie
Short Answer: You can find good control and probably a better all around experience in a multi versus a traditional synthetic in my opinion. However, many multis may not have as steady of performance (tension loss, etc.) so you have to find the right one. Don't give up.

Details:

I have hit Volkl Classic Synthetic Gut, Forten Sweet, and Gosen Sheep. I would consider those traditional synthetics ("traditional core" with wraps)

I have hit a few "control" multis - (PPC and Rip Control) and some other multis like X-One, NRG, Alpha 2000, Hexy Fiber, etc.

My primary goals were control, spin, feel, and comfort.

Volkl and Forten had moderate to higher power with consistency and decent control. The spin was average and the feel was average. The comfort wasn't the greatest. The performance held steady for 5+ hours. Forten had a great sweet spot size and was great slicing. I thought I wanted a string in this category, but I tried some multis afterwards.

I found better feel, control, and the right balance of power with PPC (multi). I think you can find a great all around string in a multi that does have control.

The only string I feel like I have left to try for this combination NXT Tour/Power or NXT Control. These strings, PPC, and Head FXP have pretty unique designs versus some of the other multis.
 

ghetto3jon

New User
Thanks for the feedback. It's too bad the TWU stiffness ratings don't always translate to the court. For instance, most synthetic guts measure "stiffer" than these "control multis"...but most testimonials (and all of the marketing) says otherwise.
 

BorderLine

Rookie
Thanks for the feedback. It's too bad the TWU stiffness ratings don't always translate to the court. For instance, most synthetic guts measure "stiffer" than these "control multis"...but most testimonials (and all of the marketing) says otherwise.

I agree 100% and I had a few professional stringers tell me to focus on the stiffness ratings for grouping strings and finding other similar strings to what I like and want. I tried that and it didn't work. It through me for a loop and I figured out that the stiffness rating isn't reliable or that insightful for feel or performance. It sounds like we had a similar journey.

There are some multis that are lower powered that perform well and help with control. However, I do think these are special/rare as many multis don't perform well very long, have hot spots (launch balls), and/or just have high power (good for some).

I think multis have their place and I have found a home with one that I think is better than a traditional synthetic or poly hybrid setup for me, my arm, my racquet, and game.
 

KaiserW

Hall of Fame
I think you will find most multis will be more powerful than sg. Since you are looking for more control and less power I think you will be disappointed. I was curious also about multis being a long time sg user. I found PPC to be too powerful for me so I am now back to POSG. I am sure there are some lower powered multis compared to PPC though.
 

BorderLine

Rookie
Try Alpha 2000 and string it tight.

I would rate it a 5 to 6 for power on a scale of 1 to 10.

I would rate PPC a 6.5.

I would rate Hexy Fiber an 8.5.

Rip Control - 5.5

X-One Bi-Phase - 8 to 9 depending on tension and racquet.

NRG - 7.5ish

Forten - just strange - pretty powerful, but easy to get depth right - 7.5

Volkl Classic - 7.5ish

Gosen Sheep - 6.5ish
 

ghetto3jon

New User
Yeah, it was actually a review of the NXT Control that sent me down this rabbit hole (again). They called the NXT-C "poly like" in terms of power and control...and I've read the same thing about RIP-C. Stiffness numbers say otherwise...so it's either marketing worming its way into the reviewers brain, or deceptive stiffness ratings.
 

BretH

Semi-Pro
Prefer Clay Court Plus to full beds of Gosen Micro Sheep and Forten Sweet having spent a fair number of string jobs with both.

And hey, what other string gives you visual indication of where on the stringbed you hit the most? :)
 
Control multis

I have used lots of control multis as well as synthetic gut strings.

Head Rip Control: best control / lowest powered of the class. Feels quite numb or dead. Not very stiff at all. Can really rip it (so to speak). Gets better as it ages.

Wilson Optimus: Better feel than RIP C but thats not saying much is it? Low powered. Need to hit hard cause it has little feedback on touch shots. Can also rip your shots with confidence. On the stiff side for a multi. Also gets better as it ages (not much power gain but softens up)

Prince Premier Attack/Control: Feels great when fresh. Great spin throughout its life since it seems to snapback rather than lock in place. Does get mushy as it ages and loses tension.

Syn gut: depends on the brand. PSGD has lots of control fresh but loses playability fairly quickly and its not the softest SG. Volkl SG (probably my favorite) plays very soft but fairly crisp, keeps playability well. Forten Sweet, very soft but not very crisp at all IMO. Gosen micro, crisper but tends to lose playability fairly early.

I think both the PPC and the RC multis feel quite soft and forgiving. None of the above strings are harsh however.

Hope that helps.
 

SJSA

Professional
I've used synthetic gut exclusively (Prince, Gamma, Etc.), but I'm always looking for more control and less power (I like to swing away, but wrist issues prevent me from using ploys). I frequently read about "control" multis, and often reviewers mention how low-powered some of them are (Head Rip Control, Prince Premier Control, Wilson NXT Control, Etc.)…but I know multis are typically more-lively than synthetic gut. So are these "control" multis simply low-powered compared to traditional multis? Is moving from PSG to HRC or PPC a backwards move for someone hoping to find more control and less power?

Head Rip Control is your answer.
 

ghetto3jon

New User
Thanks guys. So the consensus seems to be that there are indeed some multis (RIP-C, for example) that are less-powerful than most synthetic guts. This flies in the face of the TWU stiffness ratings...but that's why we play the game, as they say.
 

KaiserW

Hall of Fame
Thanks for the feedback. It's too bad the TWU stiffness ratings don't always translate to the court. For instance, most synthetic guts measure "stiffer" than these "control multis"...but most testimonials (and all of the marketing) says otherwise.

Most synthetic guts are stiffer than most multis? Don't no where you are reading otherwise.
 

ghetto3jon

New User
Yeah, according to stiffness ratings and real-world practice, your average syn gut is stiffer than your average multi. But in the case of RIP-C, and perhaps some others, a multi can actually play with "less power" than many syn guts. Isn't that the takeaway here? Or am I confused?
 

Hi I'm Ray

Professional
RIP Control. Compared to most syn guts its lower powered, softer, response feels more predictable, and has a bit more spin
 

logrock

Rookie
Out of the blue I just strung up my PKi5 315 with technifibre Multifeel 17 ga.in a full bed @ 52lbs.
Normally I would hybrid it with BHS 17ga in the mains.
Very impressed on my first outing, plenty of contollable power, feel & touch.
non of the trampoline effect I thought would occur, a la NRG, BiPhase or NXT.
Love it so far, might be a keeper.
 

ghetto3jon

New User
If anyone is still interested in this topic…

I just did a 2-hour test with my two Prince EXO3 Reds, one with Prince Synthetic Gut w/ Duraflex and the other with Head RIP Control. For me, the RIP-C certainly had "less power" than the PSGD, but strangely, the RIP-C also felt "softer". The PSGD had a more defined "ping", and felt more rigid. I also felt that the RIP-C had more spin potential.

I would have fun playing with either, but I liked RIP-C more. I felt like I could swing more freely, and had easier access to spin.
 

ian27

New User
Have settled on Yonex Tour Super 850 Pro now as my control-oriented, low-powered multi. I like its durability, steady performance & tension maintenance, spin potential and good playability at lower tensions. (low 50s)

Was switching back to full multi again from poly & poly-multi hybrids after a wrist injury and tinkered with old PSGD for a while........PSGD played quite oK for me (felt the same after more than 15 years!), NXT Control was a very good string, but for me 850 Pro stood out in durability, tension maintenance and spin potential.

I remember trying RIP Control many years ago and had good impressions but just can't find it locally where I live now so settled on 850 Pro.
 

ghetto3jon

New User
Interesting suggestion, ian27…thanks. I haven't come across that string in my "control multi" search.

Although I gotta say, I played with the RIP Control 16s again today, and I really enjoyed it. Strangely, my quest for a good "control multi" may have started and stopped with the RIP-C.
 

fuzz nation

G.O.A.T.
Have settled on Yonex Tour Super 850 Pro now as my control-oriented, low-powered multi. I like its durability, steady performance & tension maintenance, spin potential and good playability at lower tensions. (low 50s)

Was switching back to full multi again from poly & poly-multi hybrids after a wrist injury and tinkered with old PSGD for a while........PSGD played quite oK for me (felt the same after more than 15 years!), NXT Control was a very good string, but for me 850 Pro stood out in durability, tension maintenance and spin potential.

I remember trying RIP Control many years ago and had good impressions but just can't find it locally where I live now so settled on 850 Pro.

I've been impressed with the durability and performance of Yonex 850, too. When I picked up a 2nd hand pair of RDS 002 Tours a few years ago, one came strung up with 850 multi and I used it for several outings with no signs of the stuff fraying and breaking down. It was installed at a few lbs. lower than I would have liked it (just a little mushy), so I eventually cut that string out and swapped it for who-knows-what. While I had it though, it was hard to believe that it was a multi.

I've really enjoyed syn. gut, both 16 and 17 gauge, in my gear for a number of years. I string my own, so it's not too big a deal for me to use something that costs a little more, since I'm already saving a lot with home stringing. Even so, syn. gut has just been right for me as long as the tension is a little more snug in the heat and a little lower for colder conditions. Tecnifibre has been my favorite brand for a little while.

A pal in the tennis business handed off a few sets of Volkl Power Fibre II in 16 ga. to me last year, so I stashed them away in case I needed to give somebody a re-string with multi - I didn't intend to use it for myself. Then we got outdoors for coaching the high school boys team last month and I was hitting balls on some days with temps slightly below freezing. CLUNK!!! I usually drop tension 3-5 lbs. for colder conditions, but my syn. gut was still pretty harsh in my Volkl O10 325's and decided to sample the multi.

This stuff at 55 lbs. is running much better in two of my frames than one of the others (I have four of them) strung with 17 ga. syn. gut roped up at 52 lbs. I'm getting cozy feel, spin, control, and durability that I definitely didn't expect. Granted I'm rotating three different racquets here (just put this multi in a 2nd frame), but the Power Fiber II has been the hands down winner, at least in the chilly front end of our season. Maybe I'll need my syn. gut when it gets hotter outside, but right now I'm an entirely happy camper. It was well into the higher 60's last weekend and the multi still worked fine.

RIP Control is very decent stuff and it certainly goes for less per pack than a set of this Volkl multi, but I just checked the TW price on a reel of natural colored P-F II and it comes out to easily less than $10 per set. The natural colored reels are 720 feet, not just 660. While I usually don't look twice at the more expensive multis like X-One Biphase, I might just grab myself one of these reels in the not-too-distant future.
 

Bobs tennis

Semi-Pro
I've bounced around with a lot of different multis but always come back to Prince Lightning.It's not a high power nor high cost string and at 52lbs it has great control.Some say they tried it but it breaks quickly but i'm not a string breaker..
 

Tmano

Hall of Fame
I don't know if anyone mentioned it but head FXP control is a decent control oriented multi....but I play with a 18/20 string patter which could tame a bit to power of the string
 

ghetto3jon

New User
My great experience with RIP has been with the 16. I've heard some say that the 17 "plays" better, but knowing that the 16 (probably) gives me better durability and tension maintenance, I'm happy with the 16 for now.
 

gkamieneski

Semi-Pro
Also, FXP Tour is something to be considered. This only comes in 16g and is a poly core wrapped in multi-filaments. I see it now missing from the Head.com website, but I am sure there is still plenty out there being distributed. I found it to play a little like RIP Control with a muted feel and good durablility.
 

Tommy Haas

Hall of Fame
My great experience with RIP has been with the 16. I've heard some say that the 17 "plays" better, but knowing that the 16 (probably) gives me better durability and tension maintenance, I'm happy with the 16 for now.

What are the differences in playing characteristics between Head RIP Control 16 and 17? I'm thinking of testing them out with my Prince TT 100P and Yonex Ai98.

I've also considered ISO Speed Control/Professional (Classic and +Arm Comfort) versions and am thoroughly confused between them.

So I figured I'd make my decison easier if I went with Head's version of the strings since ISO Speed makes RIP Control for them.
 
Top