Could be limited - or no - fans at a September French Open

weakera

Talk Tennis Guru

PARIS (AP) — With the new $55 million (50 million euros) retractable roof shut atop a barren Court Philippe Chatrier — where the red clay has dimmed to an orange-brown, the court’s white lines have all but faded and there’s no net — the French Open’s main stadium was transformed into a far more imposing and modern-looking facility.

But without any fans yelling and clapping on Wednesday, it felt a bit like standing inside a silent and empty space ship. The site sits sans spectators this week: The clay-court Grand Slam tournament was postponed from now until September because of the coronavirus pandemic.

When — or if — the French Open is held later in 2020, though, it is possible there could be zero — or a limited number — of people allowed to attend the event, which broke its attendance record last year with 520,000.

Capping the number of fans allowed each day of the 15-day tournament might improve social distancing.

“Of course, we can have less people, so that the flow of people is made easier,” the French tennis federation’s general director, Jean-François Vilotte, told The Associated Press on Wednesday, when about 10 media members were allowed to tour Chatrier. “The options range from a very small reduction to the number of fans to various levels of reduction.”

Or no fans at all.

That, Vilotte said, would be a last resort.

“We are considering all the options. But we obviously prefer not to play behind closed doors. We want there to be fans there, fans who respect precautionary measures,” Vilotte said. “I have a hard time understanding why restaurants and shops are allowed to re-open, but we can’t do so at a big event like ours.”

The French federation would, of course, face significant revenue losses — tickets, hospitality, food and drink, merchandise — if no fans are allowed. As it is, those who bought tickets for the tournament’s original dates — last Sunday until June 7 — already were offered refunds.

Vilotte did not say what the cost of not having spectators would be.

“It’s too soon to answer this question,” he said.

One key question if spectators are allowed: How to gauge what rules should be applied at a 17-arena tournament?

“It’s not a football stadium. It’s not one unique location. There are many courts,” Vilotte said. “So how do we organize ourselves in terms of managing the flow?”

Even with a roof, night sessions are not planned at the French Open until 2021. If matches can go ahead in September, eight of the competition courts will have artificial lights to allow play until 9:30 p.m. local time — roughly as late as they would have ended if the tournament were held as scheduled in May and June.

Vilotte said the roof, which makes the French Open the last of the four Grand Slam tournaments to have at least one court protected from rain, is fully operational, other than some fine-tuning to lessen the noise when it closes.

The covering has 11 large sections, gleaming gray slabs that measure 360 feet (110 meters) long and weigh 660,000 pounds (330 tons) apiece.

It is part of a wider renovation that cost about $415 million (380 million euros) and included the destruction of Court No. 1, known as the “Bullring,” to make way for a grassy space.

About a dozen or so construction workers were visible around Chatrier and its surrounding, smaller courts Wednesday, including Court No. 6, which had its seating removed so the roof’s sections could be placed there before being installed.

Those seats need to be replaced. Other work that still needs to be completed, according to Vilotte: finishing hospitality suites and a new media center.
 

PerilousPear

Professional
It should be played at Paris hard courts. Nobody wants a clay tournament in the middle of HC season. Not even Thiem.
 
D

Deleted member 770948

Guest
It should be played at Paris hard courts. Nobody wants a clay tournament in the middle of HC season. Not even Thiem.
Nobody wants a hardcourt event when they can play at Roland Garros.
Hardcourt probably won't even exist in future anyway, considering its the main source of injury.
And hardcourt has only existed for half of tennis history anyway....
 
D

Deleted member 770948

Guest
Roland Garros is the most talked-about event in the history of tennis.
Imagine after Rafa retires how weird it will be for Roland Garros to be up for grabs.....it'll be worth a lot more than ONE slam.
 

tennis_pro

Bionic Poster
How much did Nadal pay them to organise the tournament this year? I mean holy S every other tournament in the world is being very cautious here and has no problem cancelling their tournament but they just keep pushing and pushing for it to be played.
 

Enceladus

Legend
Roland Garros is the most talked-about event in the history of tennis.
Pnxsvii.gif


Not at all. The most talked event in history of tennis is this:
wimbledon-vector-logo.png
 

Mark-Touch

Legend
How much did Nadal pay them to organise the tournament this year? I mean holy S every other tournament in the world is being very cautious here and has no problem cancelling their tournament but they just keep pushing and pushing for it to be played.
Can you imagine what would happen if even *one* F.O. fan died after contracting Covid at the tournie?
 

BeatlesFan

Bionic Poster
How much did Nadal pay them to organise the tournament this year? I mean holy S every other tournament in the world is being very cautious here and has no problem cancelling their tournament but they just keep pushing and pushing for it to be played.
And we suffer through 800 threads weekly from Nadal obsessives whose entire self esteem rides on getting #20.
 

Mike Sams

G.O.A.T.
How much did Nadal pay them to organise the tournament this year? I mean holy S every other tournament in the world is being very cautious here and has no problem cancelling their tournament but they just keep pushing and pushing for it to be played.
Actually Nadal said he preferred no tennis being played this year. He will be under a lot of pressure as there's basically no warm up going into RG. And he's going to try to pull this off at 34 with the potential for injuries and cramps. Not just him but many other players will be susceptible. Wouldn't surprise me if a new Slam winner emerged.
 

stringertom

Bionic Poster
And we suffer through 800 threads weekly from Nadal obsessives whose entire self esteem rides on getting #20.
Just remind the obsessives that The Nadal would have #20 already and be alone at that number if he hadn’t blown a 3-1 lead in the fifth over his pigeon at AO’17.
 

Mike Sams

G.O.A.T.
Just remind the obsessives that The Nadal would have #20 already and be alone at that number if he hadn’t blown a 3-1 lead in the fifth over his pigeon at AO’17.
How about that 4-2 and 30-15 lead in the 5th set at AO2012 final? Or the numerous BPs in the 5th set at Wimbledon 2018 SF? Nadal's had some bad luck in the Slams.
 
D

Deleted member 770948

Guest
I personally don't think Rafa has been unlucky.
The best player on the day wins the biggest points, just like when Michael Jordan made all those game-winning-shots, its no fluke.
Federer was the more confident player in that 2017ao Final, and Djokovic was the more confident player in the 2012ao Final and 2018wim SF.
The only situation of luck is when a ball hits the top of the net and falls over.
 

Mike Sams

G.O.A.T.
I personally don't think Rafa has been unlucky.
The best player on the day wins the biggest points, just like when Michael Jordan made all those game-winning-shots, its no fluke.
Federer was the more confident player in that 2017ao Final, and Djokovic was the more confident player in the 2012ao Final and 2018wim SF.
The only situation of luck is when a ball hits the top of the net and falls over.
True but then there's also the instance where Nadal missed a shot that he'd have made 99 times out of 100 with ease and he happened to miss it that one time in the most crucial part of the match. So we could say that one single shot cost him a possible 5-2 lead in the 5th but instead it went back on serve at 4-3.
 

Mark-Touch

Legend
How about that 4-2 and 30-15 lead in the 5th set at AO2012 final? Or the numerous BPs in the 5th set at Wimbledon 2018 SF? Nadal's had some bad luck in the Slams.
I personally don't think Rafa has been unlucky.
The best player on the day wins the biggest points, just like when Michael Jordan made all those game-winning-shots, its no fluke.
Federer was the more confident player in that 2017ao Final, and Djokovic was the more confident player in the 2012ao Final and 2018wim SF.
The only situation of luck is when a ball hits the top of the net and falls over.
True but then there's also the instance where Nadal missed a shot that he'd have made 99 times out of 100 with ease and he happened to miss it that one time in the most crucial part of the match. So we could say that one single shot cost him a possible 5-2 lead in the 5th but instead it went back on serve at 4-3.

Man he opened the door for you to slam on his fingers and you just let him right off the hook!
Unless.... you were being serious when you said he had bad luck?
I thought for sure, you were being sarcastic!

Yeah, the only reason Nadal lost in all of those slams was due entirely to bad luck. LOL!!!
 

Mike Sams

G.O.A.T.
Man he opened the door for you to slam on his fingers and you just let him right off the hook!
Unless.... you were being serious when you said he had bad luck?
I thought for sure, you were being sarcastic!

Yeah, the only reason Nadal lost in all of those slams was due entirely to bad luck. LOL!!!
:-D :-D Agreed. I did think Nadal was a tiny bit unlucky in that AO2012 final in the 5th set but other than that, you're right.
 
Top