Could Djokovic nudge Nadal into 3rd place in the GOAT debate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 733170
  • Start date Start date
In all fairness to Nadal, he was able to turn things around against him. Beat him consecutive times after that, FO and USO. That's one of the Warrior's great assets. dON'T COUNT OUT the Nadal just yet:)

Oh, sure - the way Nadal has turned the rivalry around at the grand slams from RG 2012 onward is as impressive an example as any of why he's one of the four great players of the Open Era (alongside Borg, Federer, and Petros). And is a further example of how, alongside Sampras, he's the greatest at the mental side of the game as any (a huge aspect of what constitutes "talent" in an individual sport like tennis).
 
Oh, sure - the way Nadal has turned the rivalry around at the grand slams from RG 2012 onward is as impressive an example as any of why he's one of the four great players of the Open Era (alongside Borg, Federer, and Petros). And is a further example of how, alongside Sampras, he's the greatest at the mental side of the game as any (a huge aspect of what constitutes "talent" in an individual sport like tennis).

That is why as far as excitement and competition is concerned, the Nadalovic competition is better than Fedal's. When Rafa and Nole play, esp at a GS, you you don't know who's gonna win
 
Agreed on all fronts. Who'd have thought Mac was done winning majors at the end of 1984? Djokovic could be winning one or more slams a year for another 4-5 years, or he (and Nadal and Federer) might be swept away in a season or two. All that's clear to me at this point is that the generation between Nadal/Djokovic/Murray and Kyrgios/Coric/Thiem etc. has been unusually docile, historically speaking.
That's exactly what I have been saying. First, we never know how the top, established players are going to do in the future. Who knew that Borg would quit at around age 26? Or that Connors would go on playing until almost 40?

And yes, there has been a huge gap. We've been hearing lately that everything has changed, that young players can't dominate any more.

I don't believe this. I think we've been going through a drought of young talent. I hope it is about to change.
 
Time to revisit this old chestnut?

If Djokovic wins 3 slams this year, this scenario will gain serious transaction...
 
Catch Nadal ? :lol:

Catch Federer?! :lol: :lol:

He might catch Federer in the h2h but that's it...

He is in his prime! Easily the best in the world! He got 6 years advantage still on fed and now only 9 behind. If he can win 3 or 4 slams this year it's on. Then if he can keep getting say 2 next couple of years he will go close! :)
 
He is in his prime! Easily the best in the world! He got 6 years advantage still on fed and now only 9 behind. If he can win 3 or 4 slams this year it's on. Then if he can keep getting say 2 next couple of years he will go close! :)

How long did it take him to win his first 8?
 
If Nadal continues losing to guys out of the top 100 on a regular basis I would say yes. But if that keeps happening he will retire.
 
How long did it take him to win his first 8?

He is a better player now than he was ever before! Maybe except 2011 but it's pretty close. Plus the competition is weakening. Federer and Nadal are declining. Murray is a basket case and nole's pigeon and Nole owns the young guns as well as veterans like stan or cilic. It's Nole's time! Who is gonna stop him? :)
 
Nadal isn't even 2nd in the "GOAT debate" so that would already be impossible. The GOAT debate is only between Laver, Federer, and Gonzales. Nadal is 3rd or 4th all time, but not part of any GOAT debate, atleast not now.
 
Could Djokovic nudge Nadal into 3rd place in the GOAT debate?
nole can't do that 'cause the nadal has never been on the goat podium :unsure:
podium.jpg
 
Back
Top