falstaff78
Hall of Fame
Here are cumulative stats for Cilic and Querrey through the first 5 rounds. Same story as Federer vs. Raonic.
Enjoy!
@Meles @Gary Duane @Chanwan @Sysyphus @Red Rick @BeatlesFan
- Cilic more dominant overall winning more sets (88% vs. 68%), more games (59% vs. 55%), more points (56% vs. 53%) and a higher dominance ratio (1.49 vs. 1.26)
- Furthermore he has achieved this against tougher opposition - average grass ELO ranking 20 vs. 39 (ATP ranking is lower - but grass ELO much more meaningful)
- On serve their performance has been similiar - both held 91% of games, won 73% and 74% of points, and outperformed the top 100 vs. their respective opponents by 6 and 7 p.p.
- Cilic's overall better numbers come from return - he's winning 27% of return games vs. 20%, and 41% of return points vs. 33%
- And this difference would be even more stark if Querrey weren't winning an absurdly higher % of break points than other return points (19 p.p. more!)
- Fun fact: although Querrey has played 24% more points than Cilic, he has run 16% less distance; he runs one of lowest distances per point in the entire tournament
Enjoy!


@Meles @Gary Duane @Chanwan @Sysyphus @Red Rick @BeatlesFan
Last edited: