Curious’ match/practice videos

YES. I spent 4.5 years trying to find my forehand. Haven't changed it the last 3.5 years. So happy with it for the last 3.5 years despite needing 4.5 years to find it. I am all about 'right and wrong', 'yes and no' with regards to tennis technique then keeping it once perfection is reached then theorizing it in print. Or sometimes theory produces the output.
Not sure if this is related to your post, but I'm finding with forehand (only been using my current technique for about 2 years), it's hard to separate evaluating my stroke mechanic vs. the overlapping, ongoing project to estimate & make good spacing and timing for each incoming ball.

Maybe that confounding simplifies with more years of playing.
 
YES. I spent 4.5 years trying to find my forehand. Haven't changed it the last 3.5 years. So happy with it for the last 3.5 years and counting despite needing 4.5 years to find it. I am all about 'right and wrong', 'yes and no' with regards to tennis technique then keeping it once perfection is reached then theorizing it in print. Or sometimes theory produces the output.
sO In the last 3.5 years you only drilled your FH to make it more familiar? No more changes?
 
Not sure if this is related to your post, but I'm finding with forehand (only been using my current technique for about 2 years), it's hard to separate evaluating my stroke mechanic vs. the overlapping, ongoing project to estimate & make good spacing and timing for each incoming ball.

Maybe that confounding simplifies with more years of playing.
" estimate & make good spacing and timing for each incoming ball."

I think that's the receiving skill, unrelated to the stroke mechanic.
 
You know why I asked that?

To get a better picture on how recent and how much you know about Curious tennis.

Curious does changes over time. Techniques and I guess the physical too.

Yes but I have improved other parts of my game as well over this time.
 
what’s wrong with the forum? It’s so quiet. I’m starting to feel withdrawal symptoms!
I’d better stir it up a bit.
Federer and Sinner forehands are almost identical!
 
what’s wrong with the forum? It’s so quiet. I’m starting to feel withdrawal symptoms!
I’d better stir it up a bit.
Federer and Sinner forehands are almost identical!
Your best post ever!! Def most accurate. Yes they are almost identical. Almost all are. You’ve been played the fool by YouBoob instructors.
 
what’s wrong with the forum? It’s so quiet. I’m starting to feel withdrawal symptoms!
I’d better stir it up a bit.
Federer and Sinner forehands are almost identical!
Your best post ever!! Def most accurate. Yes they are almost identical. Almost all are. You’ve been played the fool by YouBoob instructors.

Well I am telling you I don't intend to invert and have no feeling of inversion.
And I dream of hitting a forehand like this...


And my teammates say my fh resemble Sinner's, even C himself have said that!


 
Look at the point where the player starts his forward swing.
Is the forearm pronated, supinated or neutral? That’s the whole point.
 
And my teammates say my fh resemble Sinner's, even C himself have said that!


There’s only one way to skin a cat and that is to take off the skin. Once the racket is flipped/wrist extension has happened the body brings the racket arm to the ball with shoulder/torso rotation. One fixed unit to contact. That is why you chose the grip and arm configuration you employ.
 
what’s wrong with the forum? It’s so quiet. I’m starting to feel withdrawal symptoms!

Well, I did suggest that TT would be ded o_Oo_Oo_O without @10sbeast888 or you.

BMG is too much a weak sauce.

 
Once the racket is flipped/wrist extension has happened the body brings the racket arm to the ball with shoulder/torso rotation. One fixed unit to contact. That is why you chose the grip and arm configuration you employ.

Serious question, mister BMG

How else do players do it? Anyone do it differently, you know?
 
Well, I did suggest that TT would be ded o_Oo_Oo_Owithout @10sbeast888 or you.

BMG is too much a weak sauce.


all human driven forums in general are probably facing the same problem. LLM's have much bigger context window and inference ability than the average human.. nowadays most of my exchanges are with ChatGPT/Gemini/Claude, depending on the usage.

the interactions with humans is simply lower quality, and the gap is growing..... besides the people you have emotional connections with.
 
Last edited:
LLM's have much bigger context window and inference ability than the average human.. nowadays most of my exchanges are with ChatGPT/Gemini/Claude, depending on the usage.

.. and the gap is growing..... besides the people you have emotional connections with.
It will be interesting to see how this aspect of LLMs (or other future AI architectures) impacts us socially over the next decade.
 
Last edited:
It will be interesting to see how this aspect of LLMs (or other future AI architectures) impacts us socially over the next decade.

I've barely used them myself to date, but yesterday I was curious and simply asked ChatGPT, "why does frank kill john?". It knew the reference I meant immediately and the conversation that followed was surprisingly engaging. Was the time spent in that conversation a waste of time? I could have been posting here, about how the volley is like a crossbow or something.

'next decade'.

according to my sources from start ups and frontier labs in SF, the world is ending in 2 years.

most people have no clue, and cannot think exponential.
 
'next decade'.
according to my sources from start ups and frontier labs in SF, the world is ending in 2 years.
most people have no clue, and cannot think exponential.
Where 10 years is going to be N^5 not Nx5? You really think it's the latter for LLMs?
 
Last edited:
what’s wrong with the forum? It’s so quiet. I’m starting to feel withdrawal symptoms!
I’d better stir it up a bit.
Federer and Sinner forehands are almost identical!
Watching you debate a man deep in delusions of grandeur has been stultifying
I am basically operating at a higher level to all of you guys.

Well, I am so far advanced that probably combined even.



Yes tennis technique. I wish I can claim about other things, but no cannot sadly for me.

You and everyone here have no idea about technique. No one here does.
You sound detached from reality and it isn’t funny anymore. I’m not even laughing at you now.

Seriously, Sinner’s forehand? Yeah, the resemblance is uncanny…
 
Fundamentally the same. Of course there are differences like your straight arm, lack of coil and take back(of the hitting hand).
But low take back and the extreme inversion the same.
 
Fundamentally the same. Of course there are differences like your straight arm, lack of coil and take back(of the hitting hand).
But low take back and the extreme inversion the same.

Again, I don't actually have a straight arm at contact (though I wish I did as many great forehands seem to have that). It's not very bent but not straight.



Play in slow-mo and see for yourself.


My coil is full and I am very compact which may look like I am not fully coiling, but my power is undoubtful, even with a compromised knee the last 6 years.
 
Again, I don't actually have a straight arm at contact (though I wish I did as many great forehands seem to have that). It's not very bent but not straight.



Play in slow-mo and see for yourself.


My coil is full and I am very compact which may look like I am not fully coiling, but my power is undoubtful, even with a compromised knee the last 6 years.
There’s something wrong with that flip. It’s extremely limited. Don’t know how I missed that before @GrandSlammer pointed out. And no, it’s not about your ‘defective wrist’, whatever that means.
 
At least from this front perspective visual, it looks like he's firming his wrist either before or right before forward motion starts?
I’m sure tense wrist is a factor but there are other things, specifically his limited coil and “too” compact take back. That’s why his fh looks so full of effort!
 
the root cause is the 'ground upping'... see the other thread of someone's discussion with Claude.

the sudden jerk is just the tennis computer realizing that there is no time for the torque to transfer to the hand, and the core has to stiffen so the shoulders can get going.

the fix should be simple.
 
btw - let's be realistic... recs cannot remotely hold a candle to the pros.

been involved in pro competition for the past 7 years. the gap is like the grand canyon.
 
I’m sure tense wrist is a factor but there are other things, specifically his limited coil and “too” compact take back. That’s why his fh looks so full of effort!

Funny, before I looked into Fognini's forehand I use to think he had limited coil as well. How wrong I was.

 
Last edited:
Back
Top