Current Non-Covid Rankings*

[James P]

The rankings if on a 52 55 (AO being 3 weeks late threw things off a bit) week rolling rank. I only did the top 35, because I was curious where Sinner would be, and much more would be pretty unwieldy.

Rank	Covid Rank	Name	Points
1	1	Djokovic	6370​
2	3	Medvedev	5200​
3	2	Nadal	3800​
4	4	Thiem	3525​
5	8	Rublev	3325​
6	7	Zverev	3195​
7	6	Tsitsipas	3190​
8	9	Schwartzman	1915​
9	16	PCB	1680​
10	14	Raonic	1505​
11	19	FAA	1365​
12	24	Ruud	1320​
13	17	Dimitrov	1260​
14	34	Sinner	1235​
15	22	Garin	1175​
16	11	Shapo	1125​
17	26	Coric	1120​
18	10	Berrettini	1080​
19	23	De Minaur	1015​
20	28	Evans	920​
21	13	RBA	905​
22	21	Khachanov	875​
23	31	Humbert	810​
24	35	Sonego	755​
25	12	Monfils	745​
26	20	Wawrinka	700​
27	32	Krajinovic	695​
28	33	Fritz	675​
29	30	Hurkacz	600​
30	27	Lajovic	570​
31	15	Goffin	515​
32	18	Fognini	480​
33	25	Isner	370​
34	29	Paire	140​
35	5	Federer	0​

The Non-Covid Rankings aren't necessarily perfect, since there might be people outside of the top 35 that did better. Obviously Federer would be unranked in this scenario. I'm aware people chose to not attend tournaments and that that is a factor in a lot of these rankings, but I can only deal with the facts of what points were actually earned.

 

[BGod]

Still LOL at Medvedev being #2 on paper. Murray from 2012-2013 would massacre the boy while Wawrinka's career high of #3 will stand as a giant middle finger to next genners.

 

[Tennis_Freak99]

This clearly shows that Djokovic was robbed 22 weeks at number 1

 

[CYGS]

This clearly shows that Djokovic was robbed 22 weeks at number 1

It’s a sign - Djokovic needs to reach 378 to exceed Graf’s 377 and 378+22 = 400 weeks.

 

[Lleytonstation]

It’s a sign - Djokovic needs to reach 378 to exceed Graf’s 377 and 378+22 = 400 weeks.

Hypotheticals again...

 

[CYGS]

Hypotheticals again...

Where is the hypothetical?

 

[Lleytonstation]

Where is the hypothetical?

22 weeks.

 

[CYGS]

22 weeks.

That actually happened (22 weeks robbed) - so you are wrong as usual.

 

[James P]

Still LOL at Medvedev being #2 on paper. Murray from 2012-2013 would massacre the boy while Wawrinka's career high of #3 will stand as a giant middle finger to next genners.

4200 of his 5200 points were earned in the last four tournaments he played in (Paris-1000, ATP Finals-1500, ATP Cup-500, Australian Open-1200).

 

[Lleytonstation]

That actually happened (22 weeks robbed) - so you are wrong as usual.

Never happened. Did not earn them with play. Once again you are at it with hypotheticals just like him winning WC20.

 

[CYGS]

Never happened. Did not earn them with play. Once again you are at it with hypotheticals just like him winning WC20.

Well those 22 weeks did happen - whether or not they counted towards the total is a different matter - so no hypothetical here nor did I wanna claim those 22 weeks.

My original statement only consists of two facts:
1. Djokovic needs 378 to surpass Graf’s 377 (fact)
2. 378 + 22 = 400 (also fact)
There’s no hypothetical. You are wrong. Case closed.

 

[James P]

Aslan Karatsev would have 1219 points in non-covid ranking points.

 

[Lleytonstation]

Well those 22 weeks did happen - whether or not they counted towards the total is a different matter - so no hypothetical here nor did I wanna claim those 22 weeks.

My original statement only consists of two facts:
1. Djokovic needs 378 to surpass Graf’s 377 (fact)
2. 378 + 22 = 400 (also fact)
There’s no hypothetical. You are wrong. Case closed.

Look, I can play this game too...

Fed: 20 + 5 = 25 slams

 

[CYGS]

Look, I can play this game too...

Fed: 20 + 5 = 25 slams

Irrelevant.

 

[Lleytonstation]

Irrelevant.

Exactly. Point and case. Another win for the Feds.

 

[CYGS]

Exactly. Point and case. Another win for the Feds.

Irrelevant to your wrong claim about my post - there is nothing hypothetical about my post.

 

[Phoenix1983]

Look, I can play this game too...

Fed: 20 + 5 = 25 slams

Honestly, if we met CYGS in real life, everyone here would own him in logic so easily.

 

[CYGS]

Hypotheticals again...

Comprehension 101 - failed.

 

[CYGS]

Honestly, if we met CYGS in real life, everyone here would own him in logic so easily.

You wish you could meet me.

 

[Lleytonstation]

Irrelevant to your wrong claim about my post - there is nothing hypothetical about my post.

He does not have 22 weeks that you are just randomly adding. That is either hypothetical or just bad math.

 

[Deleted member 743561]

You wish you could meet me.

But you wish you could be Djokovic. Big difference.

 

[Tennisfan339]

Thanks for this ranking. Very insightful.

Are you the one who calculated everything for every players? Or did you find this list somewhere else? Are you using some kind of software?... (just out of curiosity)

 

[Lleytonstation]

Comprehension 101 - failed.

Dont be jelly because Fed is the better winner. Enjoy your weeks record, just know you will always have to subtract 22 weeks from your hypothetical total.

 

[CYGS]

He does not have 22 weeks that you are just randomly adding. That is either hypothetical or just bad math.

Not my fault you misunderstood my post.

 

[CYGS]

But you wish you could be Djokovic. Big difference.

And you wish you could be me.

 

[Lleytonstation]

Not my fault you misunderstood my post.

No worries, we can help you with your sentence structure, however, the logic you used might be difficult to fix.

 

[CYGS]

Dont be jelly because Fed is the better winner. Enjoy your weeks record, just know you will always have to subtract 22 weeks from your hypothetical total.

Fed is a broken record - you are jelly about Djokovic breaking his. Truth.

 

[Lleytonstation]

And you wish you could be me.

Why would I want to be a hypothetical... CYGS

 

[Street]

Still LOL at Medvedev being #2 on paper. Murray from 2012-2013 would massacre the boy while Wawrinka's career high of #3 will stand as a giant middle finger to next genners.

Man, recency bias on these boards is really strong. People were hailing medvedev as the next tennis god who is going to destroy Djokovic in the AO final and now he is worse than baghdatis. The guy had one off match against one of the goat candidates in the final of his favourite tournament. His 20 match winning streak is still impressive, especially with 11 top 10 wins.

 

[CYGS]

No worries, we can help you with your sentence structure, however, the logic you used might be difficult to fix.

You have to worry. Either stay in school, or quit smoking.

 

[Lleytonstation]

Fed is a broken record - you are jelly about Djokovic breaking his. Truth.

At least he made one of the lists.

 

[CYGS]

Why would I want to be a hypothetical... CYGS

Double account caught.

 

[Backspin1183]

Damn! The COVID rankings should have started much earlier so Rafa could have gotten 30+ weeks more at number 1 ranking while just fishing in Majorca.

 

[CYGS]

At least he made one of the lists.

Even when considering all his Mickey Mouse titles, he still can’t top the list. Sad.

And super outdated as Djokovic has 82 now.

 

[Lleytonstation]

Even when considering all his Mickey Mouse titles, he still can’t top the list. Sad.

And super outdated as Djokovic has 82 now.

Hey your boy made a list... you might have to scroll down to see his name though.

 

[Lleytonstation]

Damn! The COVID rankings should have started much earlier so Rafa could have gotten 30+ weeks more at number 1 ranking while just fishing in Majorca.

Just count them, seems like Djoker fans are.

 

[CYGS]

Hey your boy made a list... you might have to scroll down to see his name though.

Federer played 6 years longer - % wise he’s behind Djokodal. Try harder.

 

[Street]

Hey your boy made a list... you might have to scroll down to see his name though.

I'm not a djokovic fan but aren't those stats pretty irrelevant? I mean, was connors the goat all this time?

 

[CYGS]

I'm not a djokovic fan but aren't those stats pretty irrelevant? I mean, was connors the goat all this time?

Because he’s a broken record himself.

 

[Street]

I'm just legitemately asking, i'm not looking to argue over who is better or whatever.

 

[Deleted member 758560]

At least he made one of the lists.

lendl looks like a donkey(animal)..not a good picture of him

 

[James P]

Thanks for this ranking. Very insightful.

Are you the one who calculated everything for every players? Or did you find this list somewhere else? Are you using some kind of software?... (just out of curiosity)

I manually did it. Was tedious, but honestly took me maybe 45 minutes.

 

[Lleytonstation]

I'm just legitemately asking, i'm not looking to argue over who is better or whatever.

No, but he is always talking about who is the better winner and so on and so on. Plus, Connors tournaments could really be considered Mickey Mouse, while Feds were at least actual 250 events and 500's.

But I do think it is a significant stat, but not a stat that means everything obviously.

 

[Nadal_Django]

Man, recency bias on these boards is really strong. People were hailing medvedev as the next tennis god who is going to destroy Djokovic in the AO final and now he is worse than baghdatis. The guy had one off match against one of the goat candidates in the final of his favourite tournament. His 20 match winning streak is still impressive, especially with 11 top 10 wins.

If Federer instead of Djokovic was doing the slaying on Sunday night, Medvedev would have been a HC peaking God right now.

 

[Backspin1183]

If Federer instead of Djokovic was doing the slaying on Sunday night, Medvedev would have been a HC peaking God right now.

Wrong. Cilic in 2017 Wimbledon final is accepted by most Federer fans as a weak Slam finalist.

 

[Lleytonstation]

Wrong. Cilic in 2017 Wimbledon final is accepted by most Federer fans as a weak Slam finalist.

About as weak as it gets actually. No shame in that. No shame in Djokers win. But it does not change the fact that it was a weak opponent on that day.

 

[CYGS]

Wrong. Cilic in 2017 Wimbledon final is accepted by most Federer fans as a weak Slam finalist.

Baggy, Philly and Gonzy on the other hand deserve to be Big 3 of Federer’s stronk era competition.

 

[Lleytonstation]

Baggy, Philly and Gonzy on the other hand deserve to be Big 3 of Federer’s stronk era competition.

Tougher than Anderson, Med, and Tsonga.

 

[CYGS]

Tougher than Anderson, Med, and Tsonga.

Yes unseeded mugs are always the best.

 

[Lleytonstation]

Yes unseeded mugs are always the best.

Better than beating seeded mugs that were not as good as unseeded mugs.