david ferrer really that weak agianst nadal at his whole match ?

skypadq

Semi-Pro

i don 't think so
look at this h2h match up
h2h is 26 -6 for nadal
seems terrible
but look at the inside at h2h , these two meet more than a 10 match up in clay court
most of player can 't beat nadal at clay
and he fought Nadal best of the big three.

vs federer was 0 -17
vs djokovic was 5- 16

include two grand slam win

07 uso four set win
11 AO three set win

ferrer is well match up agianst nadal
but problem is clay
clay is such a problem
but he win agaisnt nadal at 14 MONTE CARLO QF
so he has one clay win against nadal
 

ibbi

Legend
16-5 is a better record than 26-6. Still, yes, the problem was primarily clay, and probably even more importantly (like those 3 guys have with all their fellow countrymen) no matter how high they climb the big 3 will always have them in some sort of mental headlock. Ferrer could go with Rafa on clay though, he absolutely whooped his ass for a set and a half in their 2014 Roland Garros match.
 

skypadq

Semi-Pro
16-5 is a better record than 26-6. Still, yes, the problem was primarily clay, and probably even more importantly (like those 3 guys have with all their fellow countrymen) no matter how high they climb the big 3 will always have them in some sort of mental headlock. Ferrer could go with Rafa on clay though, he absolutely whooped his ass for a set and a half in their 2014 Roland Garros match.
ferrer agianst djokovic at grand slam
2007 uso sf and 2013 uso sf these two match was just terrible
if radek stepanek and stan wawrinka push djokovic in five that open
ferrer should also
but he lost both three set b
 

ibbi

Legend
ferrer agianst djokovic at grand slam
2007 uso sf and 2013 uso sf these two match was just terrible
if radek stepanek and stan wawrinka push djokovic in five that open
ferrer should also
but he lost both three set b
In 2007 USO he played two intense matches with Nalbandian and Nadal himself, it's not like he was fresh as a daisy himself. In the 2012 one he was coming off the back of one of the best matches of the decade against Tipsy. Easy to have a let down after that.

Anyway, I'm not arguing he's better against Djokovic, he didn't have a single victory of meaning over him the entire last decade, just that the record that you brought up is less awful.
 
Top