goldengate14
Professional
Nalbandian.Many players like David ferrer, Tomáš Berdych, etc
never won slam. What can be the reason for this. They also had a good tennis. I am really curious to know
Many thanks
Nalbandian.Many players like David ferrer, Tomáš Berdych, etc
never won slam. What can be the reason for this. They also had a good tennis. I am really curious to know
Many thanks
Davydenk could not play best of fie though. I feel Nalbandian deserves tjis as he was cheated out of the USO Roddick won by the dodgiest line call of all timeDavydenko and Henman are in contention for that.
I'd probably pick Davy due to his impressive resume outside the slams.
Using this logic, do we give Andre 14 slams since he won 6 Miami's under the BO5 format?He did win Miami in slam format
Best player to never win a slam by far.
Using this logic, do we give Andre 14 slams since he won 6 Miami's under the BO5 format?
Yes please haUsing this logic, do we give Andre 14 slams since he won 6 Miami's under the BO5 format?
Nalbandian was cheated that USO. Still annoys me to this dayThe best slamless players I've seen are Corretja and Nalbandian, after them Berdych.
The best chances for Corretja were the French opens that were won by Moya and Agassi. I never watched the Meligeni Corretja match, and find it hard to understand how Corretja could get trashed by a journeyman.
The best chance for Nalbandian was the Us Open of 2003, that 5 sets semifinal he lost to Roddick with some controversy, iirc, about some spectator yelling out and making Nalbandian think it was a linesman/woman. Nalbandian later that year trashed Ferrero very easily in RR of the masters.
I think Nalbandian would have won at least one slam, and he would have had a longer career, if he hadn't been overweight during his prime. I remember a lot of retirements with abdominal tears, bad stamina, and the extra weight is very bad on the joints. He only has himself to blame for that.
No definitely not a long list.I definitely consider Dementieva, along with Sukova and Shriver, the best ladies to not have a major title. But its still a small list. Stretch the point and add potentially Safina, MJ Fernandez....Morozova? Its not like...a huge list no matter how you swing it out.
His churrasconess and fernetness too.His lordiness Nalbandian
What I meant was he won Miami in 128 draw, so he did win one slam type championship beating world number one in final.Using this logic, do we give Andre 14 slams since he won 6 Miami's under the BO5 format?
You are assuming that he will going to beat Keifer and Nalbandian/ Baggy.You could Davy could have won AO in 2006 without Fed.
And yes, I do blame peak Fed nor Nikolay not reaching a slam final while Nishikori has one.
Many players like David ferrer, Tomáš Berdych, etc
never won slam. What can be the reason for this. They also had a good tennis. I am really curious to know
Many thanks
Best player to never win a slam by far.
Radwanska comes to mind. She had great technique often won "the shot of the week/month" but never won a slam.
Ferrer
I still don't know what was Rafa up to in that tourney lol.In terms of substantial chances AO 08 Tsonga. That was a legit great run with a quality final.
I guess the whole line AO 07 Gonzo - AO 08 Tsonga - AO 09 Verdasco played some ridiculous tennis.
The rest would be "deserving" more as a coronation of their career. (Mecir, Berdych, Corretja, Nalbandian, Ferrer, Davydenko)
I still don't know what was Rafa up to in that tourney lol.
Also, Tommy Haas deserves a mention for attempting numerous comebacks.
How are we defining "deserving"? like got there should have honestly won but got injured, choked or something? or had the game and just ran into GOAT/ATG competition?
Clerc, Forget, Leconte
Philippouis did de serve in the final against Rafter but he didn’t win de slam
Scud (Mark Philippoussis) has to be in there
When Berdych beat Novak (admittedly the dodgy serve 2010 version) in the QF of Wimbledon he didn't get Jason Stoltenberg in the semi-final he got Federer. When he beat Federer he didn't get MaliVai Washington in the final he got Rafa Nadal.
Berdych might've ended his career looking out of ideas against the top guys and moving like a laden JCB but that he never won a slam and someone such as Krajicek did doesn't seem entirely fair, does it?
The reality is that if a player isn't the, or at least a match for the, elite player of a given era on a particular surface, or at a given slam, then they're not in charge of what they can achieve in their career. The question is as much about if the likes of Krajicek, Stich, Cilic, Moya, Korda, et-al were deserving of their one as it is about the likes of Berdych, Anderson, Tsonga, Ferrer, et-al being deserving of at least one themselves.
He actually did win the closest thing to a slam: Miami in 1987 when he won 7 BO5 matches.
Nalbandian was cheated that USO. Still annoys me to this day
Miami was considered the fifth major in those years.
lol no he wasn't.
Good list...I may put Thiem over Soderling for FO.AO - Murray
FO - Soderling
W - Roddick
USO - Borg
A clerk forgot Leconte?Clerc, Forget, Leconte
Enough of this Mecir (or Rios or Nalby) worship. Barring an extraordinary set of circumstances no man without a serve wins a major in any era. Period.
That's marketing. It's fair to say the AO then wasn't on par with the other 3 but Miami? A hard HELL NO. There's more to a Slam than a stacked draw (at least on paper) or the best-of-5 format.
That call was bad, but yeah to call it cheating is just sour grapes.
Soderling to me was more impressive then Thiem.Good list...I may put Thiem over Soderling for FO.
Tim Henman maybe.Davydenko must be the best player to never reach a slam final, can't think of anyone else. Plenty higher-peak players who made slam finals but never won one though.
It was cheating but not because of point but by us open organization deliberat bad scheduling in favour of Agassi and RoddickEnough of this Mecir (or Rios or Nalby) worship. Barring an extraordinary set of circumstances no man without a serve wins a major in any era. Period.
That's marketing. It's fair to say the AO then wasn't on par with the other 3 but Miami? A hard HELL NO. There's more to a Slam than a stacked draw (at least on paper) or the best-of-5 format.
That call was bad, but yeah to call it cheating is just sour grapes.
Roddick played 3 days in a row to win the USO in 2003. What favorable scheduling?It was cheating but not because of point but by us open organization deliberat bad scheduling in favour of Agassi and Roddick
Unfortunately one of many great players who just couldn't bring it to the Slams. Made 2 finals (86 USO, 89 AO) but got destroyed each time by his (then) compatriot, Lendl.
Henri Leconte. I may be biased, but that's my guy.
You keep pushing this fallacious compuhtishion rationale but it's ultimately useless if the player in question doesn't conquer the same draws of those 1-Slammers. Berdych ain't winning any of those Slams at a similar stage in his career.