innoVAShaun
G.O.A.T.
New for 2026.
Torneo is still at 3 and now if you look at MSRP, is $10 cheaper. The new Flys are $20 more than the last model. The B-Icon are now the flagship shoes by price, then Flys, then Torneo.I love Diadora, and I have a pair of the Fly 4's (as well as several other pairs of other models), and the only thing I don't like is that they are on the heavier side.
The sock liner is annoying to put on, but OK, and they are very comfortable. Prefer the Torneo 4's to be honest though.
You are right, mine are actually the Torneo 2! (Must have gotten confused). Anyway, despite not being their top model, I really like them a lot.Torneo is still at 3 and now if you look at MSRP, is $10 cheaper. The new Flys are $20 more than the last model. The B-Icon are now the flagship shoes by price, then Flys, then Torneo.
I love Diadora, and I have a pair of the Fly 4's (as well as several other pairs of other models), and the only thing I don't like is that they are on the heavier side.
The sock liner is annoying to put on, but OK, and they are very comfortable. Prefer the Torneo 4's to be honest though.
You know better, since you have actually weighed them, but I just had the impression that my Fly's were heavier.. But, and it's an important BUT, my Fly's have a clay sole, while my Torneo's the all-court sole.The Torneos are heavier than the Flys, which are the lightest of all the top 3 shoes from Diadora. My Fly 4s range from 406-421g, the B-Icon 3 from 421-432, the Torneo 3 (only 1 pair cos I didn't like it), was by far the heaviest 447g, all US11.5 without insole.
Clay is heavier. Different compound. It makes your impressions based on an unfair comparisonFly's have a clay sole, while my Torneo's the all-court sole.
Maybe the clay sole is heavier?
Ok, that makes sense. Still, I also prefer the traditional tongue of the Torneo over the sock of the Fly.Clay is heavier. Different compound. It makes your impressions based on an unfair comparison
Not necessarily. I've found the Diadora B-Icon 3 to be slightly heavier in AG vs clay. Now I only have a pair of each so no even a sample size. And 10g is within the manufacturing tolerances so could be that too.Maybe the clay sole is heavier? Maybe they just start to feel heavier with all the clay they pick up?
That's about right. I also bought the 5 and it fits a little snugger than the 4 from the mid to the front. The collar is also a smidge higher than the 4s. My biggest fit issue is the medial big toe area, due to the thicker TPU, which has less give than the 4s. So it needed a break in. I walked for about a mile and it still was stiff, so I put in the shoe stretcher, with a big nub right at the big toe. After 2 days, it fits fine.Just played with the Speed Fly 5, first time in the line. I am a B icon 2 and 3 user. The Flys are More comfy both underfoot and uppers while still very supportive, better for the knees than the b icon. Wonderful shoe overall, i am 11.5 or 12, high volume foot, went with the 12 and the angle of the outside forefoot really is sharp and is harsh on the pinky toe. This is the only issue i have, there was some numbness there first time out. Lacing system is awesome. Will fit lots of players but would likely work best for low to medium width/volume players. Overall amazing if it works for you, so impressed with Diadora, excited to try Torneo
What shoe stretcher do u use?That's about right. I also bought the 5 and it fits a little snugger than the 4 from the mid to the front. The collar is also a smidge higher than the 4s. My biggest fit issue is the medial big toe area, due to the thicker TPU, which has less give than the 4s. So it needed a break in. I walked for about a mile and it still was stiff, so I put in the shoe stretcher, with a big nub right at the big toe. After 2 days, it fits fine.
You'll find the Torneo is a bit more generous in space. I do find it interesting that you fit the B-Icon 3 in the forefoot but not the Fly. I find the B-Icon forefoot to be less comfortable than the Flys, because the Flys are mesh and the B-Icon is almost fully TPU upper, and thus there is less give. And yes I hate that there is not collar hoop to slip on the shoe... just cheap and silly to leave it out on a sock liner shoe.
Wonderful shoe overall, i am 11.5 or 12, high volume foot, went with the 12 and the angle of the outside forefoot really is sharp and is harsh on the pinky toe.
There's a thread where I wrote about sizing with certain brands. The classic "US" sizing is no longer a valid measuring point with certain brands, you will have to look at the "fits foot length" measurement for accurate length sizing.What shoe stretcher do u use?
The b icon shape is more round on the outside fronts, so while it still hits my pinky toe (and is way stiffer) it doesn’t hurt the way the sharp angle of the fly does, even though the Fly upper is softer mesh. Still though, awesome shoe and it might break in.
if u had to pick a comfortable alternative to the b icon for a bigger guy, would it be the torneo or the fly?
This is good to know! I have a pair of BS4s that I bought prior to getting a deal on some other shoes with a 6 month warranty. Figured I needed to use the others first. My foot measures as a true US10, but I order all my shoes in US11. Even still the BS4s are a tight fit. Guess I will go 11.5 if I ever decide to order the BS5.
Honestly, I hate the sock liner system, and wouldn't buy another pair of shoes with it, but leaving off the hoop just seems insane to me!That's about right. I also bought the 5 and it fits a little snugger than the 4 from the mid to the front. The collar is also a smidge higher than the 4s. My biggest fit issue is the medial big toe area, due to the thicker TPU, which has less give than the 4s. So it needed a break in. I walked for about a mile and it still was stiff, so I put in the shoe stretcher, with a big nub right at the big toe. After 2 days, it fits fine.
You'll find the Torneo is a bit more generous in space. I do find it interesting that you fit the B-Icon 3 in the forefoot but not the Fly. I find the B-Icon forefoot to be less comfortable than the Flys, because the Flys are mesh and the B-Icon is almost fully TPU upper, and thus there is less give. And yes I hate that there is not collar hoop to slip on the shoe... just cheap and silly to leave it out on a sock liner shoe.
Ah well to each their own. For me, the snug support removes the need to cinch down the laces,which helps the comfort a lot. All that aids with the feel of the shoe is part of my feet is the best for me to move on court. Tongued gussets do an ok job, but often feel like my foot is being cinched down onto a block of EVA and rubber.Honestly, I hate the sock liner system, and wouldn't buy another pair of shoes with it, but leaving off the hoop just seems insane to me!
Maybe it's because of my feet (some bone spurs), but I've had shoes with sock liners from both Diadora and Lotto, and while the shoes were great once one (and both brands usually have great products), I just found the process of putting them on wasn't worth the hassle. Plus, real or perceived, it feels like the sock liner just adds extra and unnecessary weight.
Yes, the fit with the sock liner shoes is definitely good and comfortable, and like you said it's barely necessary to cinch down the laces tight at all.Ah well to each their own. For me, the snug support removes the need to cinch down the laces,which helps the comfort a lot. All that aids with the feel of the shoe is part of my feet is the best for me to move on court. Tongued gussets do an ok job, but often feel like my foot is being cinched down onto a block of EVA and rubber.
Now not all sockliner style shoes work for me. The Court FF3 didn't. And I like some gusseted tongue shoes like the Ad Accel, B-Icon 3, Adidas Barricade 2023 ( the model between the '21 and the 13). Fit is individual though. I also have to be fair to Diadora that they do have a tab on the top heel counter to aid with foot ingress. However, it's not as useful as a hoop.
Health in terms of safety? I hope you don't mean some kind of organ failure from bad shoes. That would be saddening.I wish i would have nerded out on shoes as opposed to rackets, they are so key for health.
That's my point. The trials with shoes has been about "making it work" and other compromises that really aren't worth the effort when one can buy a pair of shoes, prestretch it with a shoe stretcher for a day or 2, put in a custom orthotic, lace it up and just go out to play for 50-60hrs until the SF5 is done. Most other shoes I've had to jump hoops like heat gun heel collars (BI3, CG2, GRX), figure out lace patterns for best lockdown (GRX is the worst!), play with different custom orthotic thickness to get the best fit etc etc. just to make it work.B icon 3 user here. Completely agree with the above. The fly 5 maybe could have worked for on court use only if i broke them in more or went up another size. My pinky toe was going numb a bit.
But the cushion was great, would be perfect for a lighter guy, especially with a narrower foot, for me as a bigger guy with a high volume foot, it could have been a tad firmer and wider overall. Again, probably could have made them work.
I wish i could merge tge bi3 and fly 5, the absolutely incredible fitting heel cup and anima foam and the width of the bi3, and the amount of forefoot foam and heel cushion on the fly5. Honestly tough to go wrong with either, both of them have fantastic support.
I wish i would have nerded out on shoes as opposed to rackets, they are so key for health.
So both US11 and US11.5 are UK11? That doesn't can't be right...US11.5 is now UK11
And for me, it is the best part of the shoe and the part that makes it a great shoe. A snug fit where the shoe moves with your feet, not a clunker like the GRX.These are such great shoes, but I hate the sock liner soooo much!
the sock liner needs to GO. They have plenty of other ways of keeping the tongue straightThese are such great shoes, but I hate the sock liner soooo much!
Yes, I totally agree here! While the shoe does feel good with the liner once it is on your foot, it's not so dramatically different that it outweighs the inconvenience.the sock liner needs to GO. They have plenty of other ways of keeping the tongue straight
I am with you - I have always loved the sock liner on these as I did with the original Asics Court FFs (pre-Novak version) which these remind me ofAnd for me, it is the best part of the shoe and the part that makes it a great shoe. A snug fit where the shoe moves with your feet, not a clunker like the GRX.
Only used the V2 for about 40 mins and hated it. Not enough lockdown without a runner's knot hole, and that weird midsole design with a strange arch hump. If you use an orthotic, I think it'd be worse!Can anyone who has used the NB CT Rally v1 compare the differences to these?