Don't lie to yourself now. You've never waited for anyone to come along. You just want Federer (same with other fanbases) to stick around forever. It's some of your (not just you) harsh judgements of these young players' always make me question things. Instead of encouraging them you lot resort to calling them mugs whenever you get a chance. And not only that, you criticize every move they make. It's just pathetic.
Golden Age was the big 4.
Now until 2030 we have Diamond Age:
1. Five players form the core of the Diamond Age with elite potential and the ability to win all four slams; Tsitsipas (20), Auger-Alliasime (18), Shapovalov (19), Zverev (21), Coric (21). Coric likely to have more of a Murray/Wawrinka career. The rest high single digit slams, maybe more for one or two.
2. de Minaur (19), Rublev (20), and Tiafoe (20) all have slam potential and also very young. Throw in the big serving Medvedev and Khachanov as one or two hit wonders possibly.
3. The early part of the Diamond Age will be Big 3 (maybe 4 or 5) and Thiem contending for majors, but the younger players will be making deeper runs by 2020.
Its really quite a group of players and the earliest cross age clashes between Gold and Diamond will continue to be historic and fascinating encounters. ATP in great shape if you have a clue on what to expect. More support discussion to follow in next post so those without a clue may get some.
TP?250s that nobody plays - check.
Next stop, a Masters 3rd round.
![]()
Just updated in post above with mention of Opelka; Isner 2.0 indeed.
Hurkacz definitely a diamond, most polish.Diamond Age back offline.
Hardly. Diamond Age stars Edmund, Coric and FAA are through, while geriatric 25-year-old Thiem has been floored by the diamondier Hurkacz, who is three and a half years his junior. Plenty more diamonds lie in the bottom half. The Great Transition into the new strong era is happening, folks.Diamond Age back offline.
I agree. I also think that you shouldn't really rule out people making quick progress at an older age. Everyone on the ATP tour is reaching their best later now.I remember similar write ups about the likes of Donald Young, Ryan Harrison, Bernie Tomic etc....What have they done? Sometimes a 'young gun' shows potential early on, but whether they deliver, that's a different matter altogether.
Diamond Age back offline.
Diamond age taking a sabbatical after IW
Like shooting geriatric pigeons in a barrelJust like the tide goes in and out, these posts by Meles are always followed by beat downs of NextGen; Thiem, Khakanov, Pouille and more to follow...
Next level BGod; Zedrot should have this on his wall.I got Zverev winning 5 Slams.
![]()
![]()
Somebody has to win those Masters.
@Meles is older than he acts around here.hush, hush darling ... don't talk.
Well, Meles won here. Monty Python. Now, I do know that 'youngsters' on this board probably don't know who they are but google it. That's a real diamond. Gee Meles how did you come up with this
? Well done.
That's been in the bag for .... since early 2018 as has this favorite:hush, hush darling ... don't talk.
Well, Meles won here. Monty Python. Now, I do know that 'youngsters' on this board probably don't know who they are but google it. That's a real diamond. Gee Meles how did you come up with this
? Well done.
Next level BGod; Zedrot should have this on his wall.
You can't really call these players until age 24 (25 in the case of Thiem it seems). Even down in the dumps back broke Rublev had a great Miami tournament that included slamming Cilic and taking a red hot Shapo to the wall. He may get back on the radar on clay. Rublev has a credible return game and if he makes a serve jump like Medvedev did at age 22.5 then could deliver nicely.
The one young player that I'll say is an absolute GOAT threat right now is Felix, aka FAA. He's at 53.1% points won so far on hard courts in 2019 which is beyond any of the Big 4 save Nadal in 2005 who was 2 months *******. Felix also looks like a boy right now with a lot of maturing yet to come physically.
You can't fully predict anything at age 18 and I wouldn't even cap Zverev quite yet as he's still got 2020 to make his big surge, something that happens for a lot of the betterer players around age 22 or a bit laterer.
You watched the match? Rublev looked very good and of course a tiebreaker is close especially with Shapo's penchant until this event of blowing leads.6-3 7-6(5) for Shapo and it only got close when The Hat regressed into walkabout mode in the second set. The Tsits match was the one where Denis was on the ropes to the end.
Russian Rublette enters TBs with five out of six chambers filled with bullets. His idol on tour is Robin Haase.You watched the match? Rublev looked very good and of course a tiebreaker is close especially with Shapo's penchant until this event of blowing leads.
Let's see how much Federe comes to net against Shapo before completely throwing Rublev under the bus. I've seen Rublev come to net plenty and he does have a doubles title. He's also just starting to get back some of his great game from a year ago.Russian Rublette enters TBs with five out of six chambers filled with bullets. His idol on tour is Robin Haase.
I remember Andrey fearing the net big time when he could have made the match a lot closer than it wound up.
Whatever, dude. Nobody was throwing him under the bus; I just know his limitations currently. If you look at @falstaff78 ’s dedicated Rubylev thread I’m one of his more active supporters, unlike you jumping on every frigging bandwagon after one of your gems plays a good match or, in this case, part of a match.Let's see how much Federe comes to net against Shapo before completely throwing Rublev under the bus. I've seen Rublev come to net plenty and he does have a doubles title. He's also just starting to get back some of his great game from a year ago.![]()
I got Zverev winning 5 Slams.
![]()
![]()
Somebody has to win those Masters.
Well this is a whole new era, there are now no players in their 20s in the SFsLike shooting geriatric pigeons in a barrel
![]()
Try watching rather than looking at tickers.Whatever, dude. Nobody was throwing him under the bus; I just know his limitations currently. If you look at @falstaff78 ’s dedicated Rubylev thread I’m one of his more active supporters, unlike you jumping on every frigging bandwagon after one of your gems plays a good match or, in this case, part of a match.
Medly was the whole reason this thread was created and my certainty that the below were no threat.OP didn't even have Medvedev on the radar. Amazing how he's really put himself in the mix as on of, if not the prime contender. (Also amazing how Zverev put himself up there too)
Still on track except Zed’s slump, but that could be ending real soon.Fair enough and he's decidedly floundering just a bit in my mind this year so the rankings projections graph maybe not so good....
![]()
FAA was the leader in this pack, but even with heart issues still tracking awfully well. All these rocketing up ranking like ATG.
@tennis_proI'm not even going to compare Bendy, Nishi, or Ferrer because they just don't have remotely similar accomplishments at the same age.
Let's do take a look at the Golden component of the diamond age. I'm willing to write off Murray at this point because his comeback from hip surgery has just been too slow. Wawrinka may yet have some fight left in him and I think Magnus Norman back with him means they think something is possible. Looking at his recent results he's clearly at least at top 20 level.
Federe still will have opportunities at Wimbledon and the upcoming Auz Open for sure, but I think we can write off the US Open at this point. He's not been NextGen resistant enough and they are good on outdoor hard courts. I thought he'd play until age 40, but now I expect to hang around in top ten through Tokyo. With Djokovic back on the prowl it would be a miracle if he got two more slams.
Nadal will be player to beat for 2019 RG, but I think the cracks will really be apparent that his days are numbered on clay. Thiem, Zverev, Tsitsipas are big threats and will be on close footing with Djoko on clay in 2019. Coric may finally emerge as a real clay threat in 2019. Khachanov has done well enough to have hopes of taking another step. Shapo should continue to develop on clay nicely. I'd say two more RGs tops for Nadal and maybe somehow a total of three slams.
Djoko will have a lot more staying power than Nadal. He'll be the favorite at Wimbledon and I don't see any of the young players ready to cause trouble in 2019. Somebody has to win 2019 Auz and if its not Fed, Djoko looks good. Tsitsipas is a bit of an unknown at Auz so hard to see him contending. Shapo might suprise because really his early 2018 showed great potential:
3 / 2018 Australian Open
R64 Hard Jo Wilfried Tsonga Denis Shapovalov 3-6 6-3 1-6 7-6(4) 7-5 H2H 1.69 - 2.10 (Tsonga had won 5 tournaments in 2017 so no slouch at this point.)
R128 Hard Denis Shapovalov Stefanos Tsitsipas 6-1 6-3 7-6(5) H2H
2 / 2018 Auckland
R16 Hard Juan Martin Del Potro Denis Shapovalov 6-2 6-4 H2H 1.33 - 3.20 (won Auckland in top form)
R32 Hard Denis Shapovalov Rogerio Dutra Silva 6-3 6-2 H2H 1.30 - 3.40
52 / 2017 Brisbane
R32 Hard Kyle Edmund Denis Shapovalov 6-7(5) 7-6(4) 6-4 H2H 1.91 - 1.91 (SF at Auz)
Lets say Djoko and Fed split Auz Open 2019. We won't know for sure until Djokovic produces results on the new, faster surface. With US Open set to be a touch slower with the changes this year. Djoko the favorite in 2019, but will have to see how US Open series hard courts goes in 2019 which has been a great surface for NextGen.
Slam outlook:
2019 Auz Fed/Djoko/Nadal
2019 RG Nadal or other if Nadal unhealthy
2019 Wimby Djoko
2019 US Open Djoko
2020 Auz ????
2020 RG Thiem or NextGen or Nadal
2020 Wimby Djoko
2020 US Open ????
2021 All NextGen (or Thiem) except possibly Wimby
I definitely would favor Djoko for those questions marks and something in 2021, but we won't really know until we're through 2019 Auz.
Do you see more beyond this? Do you see LostGen (and I include Cilic and Delpo) or Isner/Anderson somehow winning a slam? Maybe one LostGen slam is the most I see. Somebody has to win slams in the 2020s and its pretty clear in my mind that it will be the NextGen players I identify and perhaps a few for LostGen and Thiem.
If they suck at 21 they aren't going to magically start racking up Slams at 26. Stop fooling yourself. They aren't knocking on the door and losing to the big 3. They are barely making the 2nd or 3rd rounds.
I wouldn't be surprised to see someone like Raonic or Dimitrov win a Slam in 2021.
I don't see a reason why Dimitrov/Raonic/Nishikori at the age of 30/31 can't beat a 24/25 year old Khachanov, Tiafoe or Medvedev in a Slam. They have all had good and bad years and not a lot of consistency in their career. You're basically saying that they are all done which is crazy given their still relatively young age (especially for today's standards).
This is all cherry picking. Nishikori, Raonic and Dimitrov have all underperformed recently. Nishi had some really good performances but not even close to his peak performances of 2013-2016.
I'm not gonna make any predictions because I have no clue how the tour is going to look like 3-5 years from now (probably Federer, Nadal, Djokovic in the top 3 though) nor will I care about a Raonic-Tiafoe Slam final or something.
Correct prediction. Coric's Great return game from Miami 2018 just has not really materialized. Played the South American swing but he's really done nothing on Clay. Rublev is getting back on track and then some. Heard a Connie say that he was third in first serve points one this year which is astoundingly high.I still think Rublev will have a significantly better career than Coric.
Still doubling down on bendy over Medly?another one of those sh*tposts from Meles.
After that Oly. 2004 loss, Federer dominated Berdych, winning like 8 or 9 matches in a row from 2005-09.
and the bold part is another load of bullcr*p.
The mere implication of Coric possibly winning Wimbledon or Shapovalov winning Roland Garros.
![]()
Just so now. Serve game a huge surprise now two years later.De Minaur is the least physically mature of the upcoming players. He looks like a skinny kid. If he puts on some weight and gains strength he might be able to be more of a powerful attacking player rather than a scrambling counter puncher.
if Nishi is "effectively" in the top 10, the win vs Wawa in Wim 17 is "effectively" null&void since Wawa was injured.
and like I said ..
"2003-2007 >> 2016-2018 and 2003-2007 was nowhere near a vacuum, utterly clueless fella.
Berdych had won a Masters by then.
Was 11-25 vs top 10
Medvedev is 1-7 vs top 10 as of now and that win was vs an injured Wawrinka. bah !
berdych had 1 slam QF and 4 4Rs in slams by the end of 2007.
medevedev hasn't even reached 4R of a slam till now. "
at the same age, medvedev had nothing close to what Berdych had done, even with the current clear weak era as compared to the strong era in 2004-2007.
oh and your thread has been EXPOSED.
Still doubling down on bendy over Medly?![]()
What? That Bendych was a superstar? Only held back by Fed?not even relevant to my post made in Oct 2018. My post at that time was correct for that time.