Diary of a Racketaholic

veelium said:
Too bad we can't play with afresh gut/poly stringjob every session.
Not so easy to tune tension with gut/poly imo. Main reason I've usually used the thick gauges for both gut and cross, delays the ball launching longer. The extra easy pop on serve is nice though in general.
Click to expand...
Yeah, and the fraying gets to the point where you keep looking at it and going, “is this ok?“ But man, when you tag a ball and it just shoots, it’s so exhilarating. But when it shoots long, you look down at that frayed bed going, hmm.
 
taylor15 said:
Any of you guys have a PS85 that you would want to trade for something? I kind of want one, but also not enough to purchase until summer.
Click to expand...
I have one I bought that I hit a few times at the beginning and now it just sits there. Youll have to PM me what you have to trade.
 
JGads said:
Well, as it currently stands I’d have to say the 27.165 (69 cm) of my Marins. My drug dealer 808 got these in my hands as well as a Radical that’s the same length and this seems to be a Goldilocks situation of giving you just something a little extra but hiding the length. I never feel like I’m swinging an XL. Still can whip the inside-in. Yet have the added leverage (or placebo) on backhands and serves. I have now tried various Prestiges at 27, 27.25, 27.165, and this latter measurement seems to be just right.

However: the 345 is an interesting specimen for this and I don’t know if the added length will be bad or great. It’s softer and more “bendy“ to me than other Prestiges, and sometimes XLing a frame can give it an even bendier effect that can be too much at times, depending on the frame. At the same time the standard length 345 that I’ve hit lacked some oomph (I hit harder with the more crisp but smaller headed 293 and 312) and maybe the added length would give it just the kick it needs to provide easier plow. The science on this one is on you. Good luck! It’s definitely a luxurious feeling frame.
Click to expand...
I've played a lot lately with the 345 (1 and 2), and I confirm @JGads thoughts on how they play better extended. First 345.1 is 70cm and the other is 69cm and they are two different frames. I can't really explain why but the longer one doesn't feel XL at all, though is more solid and powerful. I regret shortening the other one.
my 345.2 is 69,6cm and is also very easy to move. great frames for sure.
they might feel a bit too soft when playing casually but once you start hitting hard the Prestige lineage really shines with great ball pocketing, cracking sound, and buttery feel
 
Played in with the 6-8 UTRs. It’s very funny how their shots land so perfectly in my sweet spot and strike zone. Perfect pace and height. So smooth to play against this skill level

The gravity tour is still stock and it’s been so long stock I’m hesitant to make mods. But in due time
 
SupahMan5000 said:
Played in with the 6-8 UTRs. It’s very funny how their shots land so perfectly in my sweet spot and strike zone. Perfect pace and height. So smooth to play against this skill level

The gravity tour is still stock and it’s been so long stock I’m hesitant to make mods. But in due time
Click to expand...
What mods are you thinking about if you were to make any?
 
SupahMan5000 said:
sBmssOd.jpeg
Holic thread exclusive: giving away a Boom Pro L3 Basically new.

Random selection on user likes, ending Sunday night 11pm est
Click to expand...
Last chance btw
 
JGads said:
Oh the hybrid spin is loads, but I’ve been wondering if it’s a bit too jumpy on the power scale of late when A/B-ing in match play. In hitting the hybrid is a dream. But..

Two days ago I felt so off and lost a 5-7 opening set to someone I think is a lesser player with the hybrid (albeit this was me, not the racquet or string’s fault, I was in such bad form and also feeling stiffness in my back), then switched to the old ALU bed in a second set that paused at 5-3 my serve when we ran out of time and have to continue another day. Then today I faced a really dynamite player wielding a Rafalito and used the old ALU bed again and played quite out of my mind, really, for a 6-3, 6-2 win. When we played a practice set after I went back to the hybrid and we were at 5-5 when we had to finish: I still played well with the hybrid, but my misses were long again and things just felt slightly looser, out of my full command, even though I had some extra pop which came in handy nicely on some points, yet those mistakes alongside the extra pop irked me.

So I’m leaning again towards dead full poly beds just giving me the freedom to swing away. Although I want to try a black Vs gut/RPM hybrid set I have in at least one frame because it’s supposed to be a bit more controlled than natural colored gut, and this specific hybrid feels incredible in my buddy’s TGT.

Anyway, technically speaking since that other match is on pause, little Marin’s win streak is up to 6. Tomorrow I play a non-league bout against my old Nemesis who has since moved up a level, so that will be a great litmus test to see where I really am. I don’t expect to win but If I can keep it respectable I’ll be happy. He’s in apparently killer form, as he’s above .500 in our highest level full of true 5s and above. The guys at the very top of that group are a joke, as I watched the last season’s final recently and my jaw was on the ground.
Click to expand...
I understand and GL! Speaking for myself, I had some elbow problems with poly, in the .1 (Or was it the XL FCs? Can't remember lol) and that's the only racquet I play with now (A 4th from Germany being the in mail). Maybe .1 is a tad too stiff.

In matches I don't hit long per say with gut/poly, it's more of a case of:
a) Getting tense (not being match tough).
b) Opponents staying away from my FH (need to improve the BH apparently and especially footwork + serve).
In a friendly set I lost 4-6, the other day, this new partner said that "he usually is looking FW to play against me, b/c I hit the FH so strong, but then he looses those exhanges and he has to send most of the balls to my BH instead".
 
This could be the start/rekindling of our very own long-term demo program, maybe with an ongoing list of who's got which frame(s). (Could start a Google Sheet or similar, and maybe throw some AI wizardry on it to help maintain / keep it up-to-date easier)

I'm going to give a serious look into my stuff and maybe toss in a frame or two very soon. I would encourage others do the same.

Maybe we start a separate thread on this...?
 
Alright which one of you swooped in last minute and scored that sick deal on a new Angell React 99 MPP on the bay? Kudos to you – and if you decide it's not for you, let me know.

Had a seemingly out of nowhere golfer's elbow flare up last week so I've been focused on some rest and rehab myself. Too much time to think about what how I want/need to play as I get older and what racket/string combo that will require and keep me healthy :)
 
BPlain said:
Alright which one of you swooped in last minute and scored that sick deal on a new Angell React 99 MPP on the bay? Kudos to you – and if you decide it's not for you, let me know.

Had a seemingly out of nowhere golfer's elbow flare up last week so I've been focused on some rest and rehab myself. Too much time to think about what how I want/need to play as I get older and what racket/string combo that will require and keep me healthy :)
Click to expand...
Gut/poly or poly and at what tension? GL
 
If you guys think the "Peer-to-Peer Demo Program" idea is valuable enough, and I'd be interested to hear opinions on the best way to run it, including rules/expectations, etc.

Main Goal: Provide an easier way to try frames for longer than the 1-week max at most retailers / pro shops, and/or experience certain heritage frames you've always been curious about, then be able to share quick reviews and keep an ongoing dialogue, plus all the other benefits, like we have here in the 'Holic thread.

I guess my first main question would be for @TW Staff: would doing something like this be OK in your eyes, or for everyone, ill-advised in any obvious way I'm not realizing?

Presuming it's all green lights, I enlisted ChatGPT to come up with a plan to run this, based on a prompt that was as balanced as I could make it, hopefully without over-thinking it. Here's what it came up with. I suppose we could trim it way back to only the most essential pieces first, then add components only as needed, but here it is in its entirety, just to get people's creative juices flowing (hidden behind a Spoiler tag, to be less disruptive to the thead):

  1. Suggested Data Structure (with fields and example format)
  2. Proposed Rules & Expectations (simple, clear, and honorable)

1. Data Structure​

You can definitely use Google Sheets to manage this for free—it's intuitive, shareable, and easily updated. Alternatively, you might consider other free spreadsheet-style platforms (e.g., Airtable’s free tier) if you need a more polished interface. However, a Google Sheet is most familiar to many and generally easiest to share publicly.

Below is an example table structure. You can copy/paste this into a new Google Sheet as column headers.

  1. Racquet Model
  2. Model Year
  3. Grip Size
  4. Original Donating Member
  5. Published Standard Spec
    • (Per manufacturer or Tennis Warehouse specs; e.g., 310g, 31.5cm balance, 68 RA, etc.)
  6. Measured Unstrung Specs - Optional (if you have the means to measure)
    • Static Weight (g)
    • Balance (cm or pts HL/HH)
    • Swingweight
    • Twistweight
  7. String/Tension Currently Installed
    • (e.g., “Solinco Hyper-G 16 @ 52 lbs” or “Unstrung”)
  8. Racquet Condition
    • (General rating; e.g., 8/10, plus any notes about cosmetic wear)
  9. Current Holder
    • (Forum username or handle)
  10. Check-Out Date
    • (When it was shipped to the current holder)
  11. Expected Return Date
    • (Target date for sending to next in line)
  12. Next in Line
    • (Forum username or handle of next person who requested)
  13. Review Link or Review Submitted?
    • (Yes/No, or link to posted review in the program’s main thread)
Implementation Tip:
  • Create one sheet tab for “Active Inventory” (racquets currently circulating).
  • Create a second sheet tab for “Retired or Returned Racquets” if any frames get removed.
  • Allow “view” access to everyone with the link, and restrict “edit” access to a small group of volunteers/moderators. Participants fill out a simple “Demo Request Form” via Google Forms, or simply post in the thread, and the moderators update the sheet.
  • Or, if your group is comfortable with it, allow direct editing by all participants but keep a backup copy in case of accidental overwrites.
Click to expand...

2. Rules & Expectations​

Here’s a concise set of guidelines that preserves both fun and fairness:

  1. Stock Condition Only
    • All demo racquets must be shipped in stock form, with stock base grip if possible. No lead, silicone, additional weighting, or permanent mods.
    • If a racquet arrives with any temporary additions (e.g., overgrip, dampener), you may remove/replace them as needed but return the frame in the same state you received it (except normal wear-and-tear).
  2. Shipping Costs and Care
    • The current holder pays for shipping to the next participant (this keeps it fair and consistent).
    • Package securely with enough padding to avoid damage in transit.
    • Insuring the racquet is optional but encouraged if it’s of high value.
  3. Communication & Updates
    • When you receive a racquet, promptly update the group in the forum thread (“Racquet X received on [date].”).
    • Also update or request an update in the shared Google Sheet so everyone knows where the racquet is.
    • Provide an ETA for shipping out to the next person.
  4. Time Window
    • Typical check-out period is 1–2 weeks (flexible, within reason). If you need more time, ask the next person if they’re okay with an extension or see if there’s a waiting list. Keep lines of communication open.
  5. Required Review
    • In exchange for demoing the racquet for free (aside from shipping cost), each participant owes the community a brief review.
    • It can be as short or long as you like—minimum length ~5 sentences.
    • Post the review in the main program thread under a heading like “[Racquet Model] – [Your Username] Review” so it’s easy to find.
    • Mark your review as submitted in the Google Sheet.
  6. Maintain Integrity
    • Treat all frames with respect—no intentional abuse or misuse.
    • If a racquet gets damaged or is lost in transit, communicate immediately. Work it out in good faith with the donating member and next-in-line.
    • If repeated issues arise with any participant, the group can decide to pause or remove their participation.
  7. Contributing Racquets
    • Anyone can donate a racquet.
    • The donor is permanently listed in the “Original Donating Member” field as a thank you for their generosity.
    • The frame can remain in circulation as long as it’s in playable condition or until the donor (or group consensus) requests its removal.
  8. Simplicity & Honesty First
    • Keep it fun, keep it friendly. We rely on everyone’s good will.
    • The entire spirit is to share gear and experiences, so let’s keep it stress-free and open.

Putting It All Together​

  1. Create the Thread
    • Title it something like “Peer-to-Peer Racquet Demo Exchange – Community Program”.
    • In your opening post, briefly explain the concept, link the Google Sheet, and list the rules in condensed form.
    • Offer up your initial frames to demonstrate commitment.
  2. Set Up the Google Sheet
    • Create columns as listed above.
    • Provide “view only” link in the thread, so anyone can see the inventory.
    • Let participants either post in the thread or send a direct message to sign up for demos. A small group of volunteers can update the sheet to keep it accurate.
  3. Spread the Word & Enjoy
    • Encourage folks to donate frames if they wish.
    • Keep it positive and open.
    • Watch how the program grows; adjust rules if needed.

Sample Table Layout (For Reference)​

Racquet ModelYearGrip SizeOriginal DonorPublished SpecWeight (g)Balance (cm)SWTwistCurrent StringsConditionCurrent HolderCheck-Out DateReturn DateNext in LineReview Submitted?
Head Radical Pro20224 3/8JohnDoe123315g, 31.5cm, 68 RA314g31.4cm32013.0Yonex Poly Tour Pro @ 52lbs8/10JaneSmith2/1/20252/14/2025(open)Pending
Babolat Pure Drive20214 1/4RacketNut300g, 32cm, 72 RA298g31.9cm31012.7Currently Unstrung7/10(Available)––(sign up!)N/A
(Replace the example data with your actual frames and details.)
Click to expand...

Final Thoughts​

The above system combines simplicity with clarity. It’s easy for anyone on Talk Tennis to grasp:
  • One shared online sheet for overview and status.
  • One dedicated thread for sign-ups, shipping notices, and quick reviews.
  • A short but clear set of guidelines ensuring everyone stays fair, honest, and respectful.
That’s all you need to get this rolling. Best of luck with your peer-to-peer demo program, and have fun swapping frames!
 
Last edited:
Trip said:
If you guys think the "Peer-to-Peer Demo Program" idea is valuable enough, and I'd be interested to hear opinions on the best way to run it, including rules/expectations, etc.

Main Goal: Provide an easier way to try frames for longer than the 1-week max at most retailers / pro shops, and/or experience certain heritage frames you've always been curious about, then be able to share quick reviews and keep an ongoing dialogue, plus all the other benefits, like we have here in the 'Holic thread.

I guess my first main question would be for @TW Staff: would doing something like this be OK in your eyes, or for everyone, ill-advised in any obvious way I'm not realizing?

Presuming it's all green lights, I enlisted ChatGPT to come up with a plan to run this, based on a prompt that, in short, tried to accounts for as much of a balance as possible. Here's what it came up with. I suppose we could trim it way back to only the most essential pieces first, then add pieces/ideas only as needed, but here it is in its entirety, just to get people's creative juices flowing:

  1. Suggested Data Structure (with fields and example format)
  2. Proposed Rules & Expectations (simple, clear, and honorable)

1. Data Structure​

You can definitely use Google Sheets to manage this for free—it's intuitive, shareable, and easily updated. Alternatively, you might consider other free spreadsheet-style platforms (e.g., Airtable’s free tier) if you need a more polished interface. However, a Google Sheet is most familiar to many and generally easiest to share publicly.

Below is an example table structure. You can copy/paste this into a new Google Sheet as column headers.

  1. Racquet Model
  2. Model Year
  3. Grip Size
  4. Original Donating Member
  5. Published Standard Spec
    • (Per manufacturer or Tennis Warehouse specs; e.g., 310g, 31.5cm balance, 68 RA, etc.)
  6. Measured Unstrung Specs - Optional (if you have the means to measure)
    • Static Weight (g)
    • Balance (cm or pts HL/HH)
    • Swingweight
    • Twistweight
  7. String/Tension Currently Installed
    • (e.g., “Solinco Hyper-G 16 @ 52 lbs” or “Unstrung”)
  8. Racquet Condition
    • (General rating; e.g., 8/10, plus any notes about cosmetic wear)
  9. Current Holder
    • (Forum username or handle)
  10. Check-Out Date
    • (When it was shipped to the current holder)
  11. Expected Return Date
    • (Target date for sending to next in line)
  12. Next in Line
    • (Forum username or handle of next person who requested)
  13. Review Link or Review Submitted?
    • (Yes/No, or link to posted review in the program’s main thread)

2. Rules & Expectations​

Here’s a concise set of guidelines that preserves both fun and fairness:

  1. Stock Condition Only
    • All demo racquets must be shipped in stock form, with stock base grip if possible. No lead, silicone, additional weighting, or permanent mods.
    • If a racquet arrives with any temporary additions (e.g., overgrip, dampener), you may remove/replace them as needed but return the frame in the same state you received it (except normal wear-and-tear).
  2. Shipping Costs and Care
    • The current holder pays for shipping to the next participant (this keeps it fair and consistent).
    • Package securely with enough padding to avoid damage in transit.
    • Insuring the racquet is optional but encouraged if it’s of high value.
  3. Communication & Updates
    • When you receive a racquet, promptly update the group in the forum thread (“Racquet X received on [date].”).
    • Also update or request an update in the shared Google Sheet so everyone knows where the racquet is.
    • Provide an ETA for shipping out to the next person.
  4. Time Window
    • Typical check-out period is 1–2 weeks (flexible, within reason). If you need more time, ask the next person if they’re okay with an extension or see if there’s a waiting list. Keep lines of communication open.
  5. Required Review
    • In exchange for demoing the racquet for free (aside from shipping cost), each participant owes the community a brief review.
    • It can be as short or long as you like—minimum length ~5 sentences.
    • Post the review in the main program thread under a heading like “[Racquet Model] – [Your Username] Review” so it’s easy to find.
    • Mark your review as submitted in the Google Sheet.
  6. Maintain Integrity
    • Treat all frames with respect—no intentional abuse or misuse.
    • If a racquet gets damaged or is lost in transit, communicate immediately. Work it out in good faith with the donating member and next-in-line.
    • If repeated issues arise with any participant, the group can decide to pause or remove their participation.
  7. Contributing Racquets
    • Anyone can donate a racquet.
    • The donor is permanently listed in the “Original Donating Member” field as a thank you for their generosity.
    • The frame can remain in circulation as long as it’s in playable condition or until the donor (or group consensus) requests its removal.
  8. Simplicity & Honesty First
    • Keep it fun, keep it friendly. We rely on everyone’s good will.
    • The entire spirit is to share gear and experiences, so let’s keep it stress-free and open.

Putting It All Together​

  1. Create the Thread
    • Title it something like “Peer-to-Peer Racquet Demo Exchange – Community Program”.
    • In your opening post, briefly explain the concept, link the Google Sheet, and list the rules in condensed form.
    • Offer up your initial frames to demonstrate commitment.
  2. Set Up the Google Sheet
    • Create columns as listed above.
    • Provide “view only” link in the thread, so anyone can see the inventory.
    • Let participants either post in the thread or send a direct message to sign up for demos. A small group of volunteers can update the sheet to keep it accurate.
  3. Spread the Word & Enjoy
    • Encourage folks to donate frames if they wish.
    • Keep it positive and open.
    • Watch how the program grows; adjust rules if needed.

Sample Table Layout (For Reference)​

Racquet ModelYearGrip SizeOriginal DonorPublished SpecWeight (g)Balance (cm)SWTwistCurrent StringsConditionCurrent HolderCheck-Out DateReturn DateNext in LineReview Submitted?
Head Radical Pro20224 3/8JohnDoe123315g, 31.5cm, 68 RA314g31.4cm32013.0Yonex Poly Tour Pro @ 52lbs8/10JaneSmith2/1/20252/14/2025(open)Pending
Babolat Pure Drive20214 1/4RacketNut300g, 32cm, 72 RA298g31.9cm31012.7Currently Unstrung7/10(Available)––(sign up!)N/A

Final Thoughts​

The above system combines simplicity with clarity. It’s easy for anyone on Talk Tennis to grasp:
  • One shared online sheet for overview and status.
  • One dedicated thread for sign-ups, shipping notices, and quick reviews.
  • A short but clear set of guidelines ensuring everyone stays fair, honest, and respectful.
That’s all you need to get this rolling. Best of luck with your peer-to-peer demo program, and have fun swapping frames!
Click to expand...
Would be incredibly nice for people to try frames since everyone here for most part has one frame someone else doesnt have enough interest in to buy or figure out how to get but still wants to use
 
JOSHL said:
A few weeks back me and some other holics in here got to meet the owners of FURI- Erick and Michelle. Cheers to @Boredsurfer for arranging. Erick sent me the latest Arma Pro v2 to demo and I’ve gotten out with it a couple times for dubs. So far I’m impressed. If you perhaps thought that the pro staff X was a little too much (I did), this frame is a must try. Box beam goodness. It’s allegedly a 101 sq in frame but looks and plays more like a 97/98. Also no muting so the feel is all there. Threw in the Beckett setup of O-toro/Sync and it plays great. Lots of spin. Still lots of testing to go on this one but don’t sleep on it for sure. Next I’ll try it with their C4 string.

Edit- This is the 305g version
Click to expand...
Great sticks and great company. The 305 version I played felt "pro stock-level". Just basic, simple feedback without any gimmicks in the lay up. It felt very similar to my Wilson Blade Pro but with less SW obviously. Also, whereas my Blade Pro has a launch-y hot spot, the Furi stringed felt even and predictable. This would make a great platform stick for those loving the Pro Staff but know that that stick will eventually destroy their elbow over time :) Add weight to the Furi to make it perform like a PS97, RF97 or a Blade; it's just a perfect neutral hairpin for customization.
 
Last edited:
@SupahMan5000 - In further interest of keeping this as simple/sustainable as possible, I asked ChatGPT to shoot holes in the first idea, and improve on it. It fed this back:

1. Top Pitfalls & How to Address Them​

  1. Failing to Update Status
    • Pitfall: People forget or neglect to update the spreadsheet/thread, so others are in the dark.
    • Solution:Keep it ultra-simple.
      • Instead of allowing everyone to edit the master sheet, designate one or two volunteer moderators. Participants simply post or message “Sent racquet to [Next User], date X,” and the moderator updates the sheet once or twice a week.
      • Or, if you want everyone to update, provide a pinned mini-tutorial (2–3 bullet points max) on how to edit the sheet.
  2. Reluctance to Ship (Shipping Costs / Logistics)
    • Pitfall: People balk at paying shipping or dealing with packaging.
    • Solution:
      • Remind participants that shipping is the only real cost of trying the frame.
      • Standardize recommended shipping method if possible (e.g., USPS Priority or UPS Ground) so folks know what to expect.
      • Emphasize using an old racquet box or bubble wrap to keep packing easy.
  3. Frames Getting Lost or Damaged
    • Pitfall: Infrequently, frames can go missing, or show up damaged.
    • Solution:
      • Encourage tracking numbers. This is usually free if you use a standard carrier label.
      • Clearly state that each user ships at their own risk. If the racquet is high-value, optional insurance is recommended.
  4. Not Submitting Reviews
    • Pitfall: People happily demo but never return the “favor” of posting feedback.
    • Solution:
      • Keep the requirement super minimal: “Please write a quick paragraph about your impressions.”
      • Make it fun, not an exam. Don’t make the length or detail too prescriptive.
  5. Overly Detailed Spec Tracking
    • Pitfall: Some participants don’t have the tools or inclination to measure static weight, balance, or swingweight—leading to incomplete data.
    • Solution:
      • Optional: Only gather measured specs if the donor or a volunteer has easy access to equipment.
      • Alternatively, just post the published manufacturer/retailer specs and let the racquet speak for itself.
  6. Overcomplicating or Over-Formalizing
    • Pitfall: Excessive forms, steps, or rules drive away casual participants who just want to try a racquet.
    • Solution:
      • Keep the rules short and friendly.
      • Minimize mandatory steps (e.g., keep the sign-up process in the thread or via a simple message, not a multi-page form).
  7. Burnout of the Organizer
    • Pitfall: One person tries to do all the coordination, gets overwhelmed, then the program stalls.
    • Solution:
      • Have 1–2 trusted co-organizers (or volunteers) share spreadsheet update duties.
      • Keep the group-size manageable at first. As it grows organically, more volunteers can help.

2. Revised “Essential” Program Outline​

Below is a pared-down version of the original plan, removing any steps that aren’t absolutely crucial and focusing on the essentials. Use this as your “operating manual.”

A. The Demo Thread​

  • Title: “Peer-to-Peer Racquet Demo – Community Lending Program”
  • Intro Post (2–3 Short Paragraphs):
    1. What It Is: A free (aside from shipping) demo exchange for members to try racquets in stock form.
    2. How It Works: Request a racquet, get it shipped, try it, write a short review, and ship it to the next person.
    3. Where to See Inventory: Link to the Google Sheet.

B. The Master Inventory (Google Sheet)​

  • Columns (Minimum Set):
    1. Racquet Model / Year
    2. Grip Size
    3. Original Donor
    4. Published Specs (optional: measured specs if known)
    5. String Setup (if known)
    6. Current Holder
    7. Next in Line
    8. Review Posted? (Yes/No)
Keep the measured weight/balance/swingweight columns if you already have that data. Otherwise, no need to require new participants to measure it.
Click to expand...
  • Editing Approach:
    • Option A: Two volunteer moderators (or more if available) do all edits. Participants post shipping/arrival updates in the thread. The volunteers update the sheet weekly.
    • Option B: Everyone can edit, but post a pinned quick “How to edit the sheet” note, and keep frequent backups in case someone accidentally overwrites data.

C. Rules (Simplified & Honorable)​

  1. Stock Condition
    • No permanent customizations (lead, silicone) allowed. Temporary overgrips or dampeners are okay, but remove them if they’re not yours before sending on.
  2. Shipping
    • You ship to the next user at your own expense. Use tracking. Package securely.
  3. Time Limit
    • Aim for 1–2 weeks unless otherwise arranged in the thread. Be courteous if someone else is waiting.
  4. Review
    • Post at least a short paragraph. Share your impressions!
  5. Communication
    • Post in the thread when you receive the racquet and when you ship it out.
  6. Honesty & Goodwill
    • Everyone is trusting each other with their equipment. If something goes wrong (loss/damage), please communicate and work out a fair resolution.
  7. Easy Sign-Up
    • Simply reply in the thread or message the current holder or a volunteer: “I’d like to try Racquet X next.” You’ll be put “Next in Line” in the sheet.
Note: If you want even fewer steps, consider dropping the “Required Review” rule to “Strongly Encouraged.” But generally, people enjoy reading feedback, so a minimal requirement helps the community aspect.
Click to expand...

3. Extra Tips to Avoid Headaches​

  1. Limit the Initial Pool
    • Start with just a handful of frames (the ones you offer). Once the system is proven to work smoothly, open it up to new donors. This prevents chaos at the launch.
  2. No Strict Deadlines
    • Keep the 1–2 week borrowing window as a guideline, not a harsh rule. Too many deadlines turn people off.
  3. Respect People’s Time
    • Encourage participants to only request a frame if they’re ready to hit with it in the near future. No indefinite “reserve” lists.
  4. Minimal Policing
    • If someone repeatedly ignores requests for updates or keeps frames forever, quietly bar them from further participation. But otherwise, keep it relaxed.
  5. Small “Getting Started” Post
    • A pinned post or a short bullet list at the start:
      • 1. Check the sheet for available racquets.
      • 2. Post in the thread if you want next dibs.
      • 3. The current holder ships to you; you pay shipping.
      • 4. You post a short review and pass it on.
      • Done!

4. What’s Not Essential (Remove or Simplify)​

  • Exact Unstrung Specs: Not everyone has a scale, balance board, or a swing weight machine (Briffidi or otherwise). If this becomes a burden, drop it.
  • Detailed Shipping Guidelines: People usually know how to mail a racquet. Just say “use a box or enough bubble wrap.”
  • Complex Timing Rules: A simple “aim for a week or two, coordinate if you need more time” is enough.
  • Formal Agreements / Waivers: Keep it trust-based. If you add too much legalese, you scare people away.
  • Heavy Moderator Intervention: Do not micromanage. Let participants coordinate. Mods can step in only if confusion or conflict arises.

Final Summary​

By removing non-essential data fields (like twist weight) and over-detailed rules, you keep the barrier to entry low. Participants see a simple path: (1) find a racquet they want to try; (2) ask for it; (3) pay shipping; (4) post a quick review; (5) pass it on. This fosters a positive, easygoing culture that’s historically proven to keep these kinds of demo programs running smoothly in forums.
Best of luck with your streamlined peer-to-peer demo program. Keep it simple, keep it friendly—and enjoy the racquet testing adventures!
 
Last edited:
Not sure about others, but I'm inclined to lean towards the latter post, ie. Keep It Simple Stupid. I'm also inclined to open editing up to everyone straight away, and just automate a backup copy every now and then, as I don't want this to become anything that anyone has to periodically manage in-bulk, if we can help it. I certainly don't have the extra time / brain cells, and I can't imagine anyone else does either.

Further thoughts are welcome!
 
Trip said:
Not sure about others, but I'm inclined to lean towards the latter post, ie. Keep It Simple Stupid. I'm also inclined to open editing up to everyone straight away, and just automate a backup copy every now and then, as I don't want this to become anything that anyone has to periodically manage in-bulk, if we can help it. I certainly don't have the extra time / brain cells, and I can't imagine anyone else does either.

Further thoughts are welcome!
Click to expand...

It’s a great idea and one I’d like to participate in. Thanks for all the AI work so far.

One shipping pitfall I didn’t see addressed (and I may have missed it, a lot of text to read) is that one person may be shipping from Atlanta to Tampa while the next person may be shipping from Tampa to Melbourne. Wonder if there’s a way to equalize shipping costs so randomness doesn’t stick some people with $12 and others with $100.
 
TwinCinema said:
One shipping pitfall I didn’t see addressed (and I may have missed it, a lot of text to read) is that one person may be shipping from Atlanta to Tampa while the next person may be shipping from Tampa to Melbourne. Wonder if there’s a way to equalize shipping costs so randomness doesn’t stick some people with $12 and others with $100.
Click to expand...
That's a really good point. I think perhaps the easiest way around it is to use one or more fields for Location, and then suggest the most reasonable stance on whoever pays shipping, given the circumstance. Beyond that, if this grows large enough, perhaps even having separate sheets if there are enough racquets localized to whatever region. Starting out, though, I think one or two fields and letting people figure it out on their own aught to be enough.

And my apologies for the text walls – I should have pushed for less verbosity. (noted for future AI text "dumps") In the meantime, I've hidden both behind Spoiler tags, as less of disruption to the thread.
 
Last edited:
SupahMan5000 said:
maybe my perception is completely off but am I the only one that finds the Gravity Tour very powerful?
Click to expand...
Where I see the difference between the GT and all other 98s I've tried is on defensive shots, or when I'm stretched out. The balls just simply have way more on them and I manage to send it back deep and make my opponents think twice when they thought they hit a winner.

This frame has the most CONTROLLED POWER out of any 98 I've tried (including EZ98 v7, FX500 Tour v2, Boom Pro v1).

Regarding mods, I loved it stock but decided to put leather on it and it's even better.
 
julianokay said:
Where I see the difference between the GT and all other 98s I've tried is on defensive shots, or when I'm stretched out. The balls just simply have way more on them and I manage to send it back deep and make my opponents think twice when they thought they hit a winner.

This frame has the most CONTROLLED POWER out of any 98 I've tried (including EZ98 v7, FX500 Tour v2, Boom Pro v1).

Regarding mods, I loved it stock but decided to put leather on it and it's even better.
Click to expand...
I agree about the controlled power. I've played with a decent amount of 98 frames (all the babolats, blade, tfight, etc).
I do think that the controlled power mainly works if you have good technique with average to above average spin in the modern game with a semi-western grip. A lot of reviewers have mentioned that you need to have this modern sort of driving/spin playstyle, otherwise, the control won't be there for the GT98.

I do not think that the GT98 is a good pick for older players who hit the ball flatter or who have an eastern grip. There's definitely a lot of other better options out there.
 
hdjs94 said:
lot of reviewers have mentioned that you need to have this modern sort of driving/spin playstyle, otherwise, the control won't be there for the GT98.
Click to expand...
I take very big full cuts at the ball so I think that’s why I love the GT so much

On another note I broke all my strings so I had to ask my coworker for the 305S I gave him. It’s strung with Hyper G 56lbs so not my preferred setup but I can see why so many ppl are loving it.

So much directed controlled power. It’s a point and shoot machine. I don’t hit the same heavy ball I do with the GT but this thing can hit a mean ball. But it’s definitely a frame intended for high percentage tennis

The GT makes me feel youthful. I’m almost at the side net curtain , and I’m still gonna go for that inside in winner
 
SupahMan5000 said:
I take very big full cuts at the ball so I think that’s why I love the GT so much

On another note I broke all my strings so I had to ask my coworker for the 305S I gave him. It’s strung with Hyper G 56lbs so not my preferred setup but I can see why so many ppl are loving it.

So much directed controlled power. It’s a point and shoot machine. I don’t hit the same heavy ball I do with the GT but this thing can hit a mean ball. But it’s definitely a frame intended for high percentage tennis

The GT makes me feel youthful. I’m almost at the side net curtain , and I’m still gonna go for that inside in winner
Click to expand...
I'm 100% with you here actually. Also an aggressive baseline style with big full swings with topspin produced by driving the ball instead of a more whippy vertical motion.

I also agree that the GT hits a heavier ball than the 305s and that the 305s is much more controlled point and shoot like you just said.

I personally enjoy playing with the GT more right now, but think that I'd play better with the 305s in match play. I'm also still sort of figuring out what string setup I want to use with the 305s.
 
hdjs94 said:
I'm 100% with you here actually. Also an aggressive baseline style with big full swings with topspin produced by driving the ball instead of a more whippy vertical motion.

I also agree that the GT hits a heavier ball than the 305s and that the 305s is much more controlled point and shoot like you just said.

I personally enjoy playing with the GT more right now, but think that I'd play better with the 305s in match play. I'm also still sort of figuring out what string setup I want to use with the 305s.
Click to expand...

Had the chance to hit both side by side last week. GT ball comes off with more weight for sure. Moreover, even more controlled. The 305s has nice directional control, but the depth control wasnt as smooth for me to dial in. Felt like id get a flier with the 305s pretty often, even moreso with the 300s
 
gino said:
Had the chance to hit both side by side last week. GT ball comes off with more weight for sure. Moreover, even more controlled. The 305s has nice directional control, but the depth control wasnt as smooth for me to dial in. Felt like id get a flier with the 305s pretty often, even moreso with the 300s
Click to expand...
I can see how the GT vs 305s might feel like that. I think the GT does have more depth control if you hit with good spin and the 305s less so due to its 18x19 pattern. Partly why I'm still figuring out what my ideal strings would be for this 305s to keep that power/control balance with good spin.
I do think however that the 305s has better directional control and ability to change directions than the GT as it feels more point shoot and maneuverable.
gutfeeling said:
My man! No longer having second thoughts about the GT after reading this. Excited to go play some bully ball now.
Click to expand...
Yessir! my kinda ball.
 
Soundbyte said:
"Best looking Radical, everyone's saying it. Before, the Radical was awful. But now, its a real beauty. A marvelous thing really. Some say its the best looking color of all time. I'm not saying it, but they're saying it. And they love it. They say Orange is a color of deep power and respect."
- President Trump, probably /s
Click to expand...
Οrange is the new Black.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

henrytennisadelaide
Diary of a Racketaholic... picture thread
Replies
20
Views
3K
Deleted member 775108
D
J
Diary of a Diabetic Racketaholic....
Replies
22
Views
2K
WYK
WYK
I
APD vs APDC vs APD GT
Replies
7
Views
2K
baseline_monster
baseline_monster
Mateo
APD GT 2012/2013 Diff
Replies
1
Views
1K
tennistomcat
tennistomcat
Z
Racquet choice dilemma
Replies
9
Views
1K
AJK1
A
Back
Top