Diary of a Racketaholic

I just got lucky with this one. I had a 2023 Rad MP I was about to list but one of the local women here wanted to try it. She decided to pass on it but while sitting there I noticed this Youtek Rad MP and asked whose it was. Turned out it was hers but she never uses it. I offered her the trade and she accepted.

What I'd like to try is some older Rad Pros. I have the LM Rad MP and now this YT Rad MP but I hardly ever see any Rad pros of these older gens. I'm not sure why besides maybe they didn't sell as many of the Rad Pros.
I have an LMRadMP and I love it. But, it almost belongs too much to the past era of frames. What are the specs on the YT Rad?

The reason I suggest the YT Prestige is that it's a truly epic hit. When you find your swing with that frame, it's unreal.
 
With all this talk about the Defyer, is it comparable to the PA or another beast all together?

Since I decided to pass on the new BP100, I have some unspent racquet money that needs to be used. I could just get another PA98 and be very happy, but y'all know holics gotta holic.
 
maxresdefault.jpg
 
I had the YT radical pro. It’s very demanding. The SW was crazy high. I want to say high 330s at minimum. Reminds me of the blade pro except the blade pro feels a touch better and is easier to use. The balance was challenging with the high sw.
 
Took the old prestige classic 2.0 out for a spin today - a couple sets against a player I usually can beat. Last week I beat him by a break in a practice set, with the PSVS. Today, with the PC 2.0, I did the same, in both sets. Just such a beautiful frame. I didn't notice much power loss and was kind of astounded how fast it is through the air. When I came home and measured the specs, I was a bit surprised: 344g, 31.5cm balance, and 320SW. Pretty different from my PSVS. But very stable, and really fun to play with - just so damn accurate. I think I'll hit with it again tomorrow.
 
Took the old prestige classic 2.0 out for a spin today - a couple sets against a player I usually can beat. Last week I beat him by a break in a practice set, with the PSVS. Today, with the PC 2.0, I did the same, in both sets. Just such a beautiful frame. I didn't notice much power loss and was kind of astounded how fast it is through the air. When I came home and measured the specs, I was a bit surprised: 344g, 31.5cm balance, and 320SW. Pretty different from my PSVS. But very stable, and really fun to play with - just so damn accurate. I think I'll hit with it again tomorrow.
The old Prestige Mids are super stable even at 320 SW. I think it is because all the graphite is in such a small place. Those racquets just feel soooo solid, so one, I don't know how to put it, but it is special. Nothing you can find in modern racquets, which feel so spread out with the light weight and bigger headsizes and thicker beams.
Well, I might take out my antique PC600 for a spin as I do not own those new ones.

Edit: I think "dense" is a good word to decribe it. They feel super dense in graphite, and it is so hard when you are used to this. It just feels like a different quality level, even though it is probably just that all the graphite takes up less space. And they are definitely more "aero" than any modern aero racquet as they are 19mm and 89". Nothing even a modern prestige can mimick.
 
Took the old prestige classic 2.0 out for a spin today - a couple sets against a player I usually can beat. Last week I beat him by a break in a practice set, with the PSVS. Today, with the PC 2.0, I did the same, in both sets. Just such a beautiful frame. I didn't notice much power loss and was kind of astounded how fast it is through the air. When I came home and measured the specs, I was a bit surprised: 344g, 31.5cm balance, and 320SW. Pretty different from my PSVS. But very stable, and really fun to play with - just so damn accurate. I think I'll hit with it again tomorrow.

The old Prestige Mids are super stable even at 320 SW. I think it is because all the graphite is in such a small place. Those racquets just feel soooo solid, so one, I don't know how to put it, but it is special. Nothing you can find in modern racquets, which feel so spread out with the light weight and bigger headsizes and thicker beams.
Well, I might take out my antique PC600 for a spin as I do not own those new ones.

Edit: I think "dense" is a good word to decribe it. They feel super dense in graphite, and it is so hard when you are used to this. It just feels like a different quality level, even though it is probably just that all the graphite takes up less space. And they are definitely more "aero" than any modern aero racquet as they are 19mm and 89". Nothing even a modern prestige can mimick.
I still consider the PC2.0 my main frame. I’m addicted to the feel, but like you said the frame swings so quickly. It’s easy to forget it’s so heavy because the balance really makes it easier on the arm.
 
I had the YT radical pro. It’s very demanding. The SW was crazy high. I want to say high 330s at minimum. Reminds me of the blade pro except the blade pro feels a touch better and is easier to use. The balance was challenging with the high sw.
Oh how the racquets have swung. Crazy high SW = high 330s. Was it not that long ago that we were talking about beefy BPs with SW in the 340s or higher? Have we really entered an era where we are all chasing SW in the 320s?

I will continue to live, and die, on my hill of the 330g/330SW zen.
 
Took the old prestige classic 2.0 out for a spin today - a couple sets against a player I usually can beat. Last week I beat him by a break in a practice set, with the PSVS. Today, with the PC 2.0, I did the same, in both sets. Just such a beautiful frame. I didn't notice much power loss and was kind of astounded how fast it is through the air. When I came home and measured the specs, I was a bit surprised: 344g, 31.5cm balance, and 320SW. Pretty different from my PSVS. But very stable, and really fun to play with - just so damn accurate. I think I'll hit with it again tomorrow.
The old Prestige Mids are super stable even at 320 SW. I think it is because all the graphite is in such a small place. Those racquets just feel soooo solid, so one, I don't know how to put it, but it is special. Nothing you can find in modern racquets, which feel so spread out with the light weight and bigger headsizes and thicker beams.
Well, I might take out my antique PC600 for a spin as I do not own those new ones.

Edit: I think "dense" is a good word to decribe it. They feel super dense in graphite, and it is so hard when you are used to this. It just feels like a different quality level, even though it is probably just that all the graphite takes up less space. And they are definitely more "aero" than any modern aero racquet as they are 19mm and 89". Nothing even a modern prestige can mimick.
I still consider the PC2.0 my main frame. I’m addicted to the feel, but like you said the frame swings so quickly. It’s easy to forget it’s so heavy because the balance really makes it easier on the arm.

All this love for the PC600 makes my heart happy. And also kinda sad that I don't have one sitting around anymore. Rocking that frame with gut/poly is absolutely glorious.
 
I have an LMRadMP and I love it. But, it almost belongs too much to the past era of frames. What are the specs on the YT Rad?

The reason I suggest the YT Prestige is that it's a truly epic hit. When you find your swing with that frame, it's unreal.
It came in quite light at 310 g and a SW of 317. I added a leather grip and about 5-6 g of lead to the hoop to get it to 322g and a SW of 326. Unfortunately the balance is only around 3pts HL which is less than I'm used to but I don't want to add too much weight to the handle if I can manage without it.
 
Oh how the racquets have swung. Crazy high SW = high 330s. Was it not that long ago that we were talking about beefy BPs with SW in the 340s or higher? Have we really entered an era where we are all chasing SW in the 320s?

I will continue to live, and die, on my hill of the 330g/330SW zen.
That’s cool. But even back then this racquet swing heavy. Go try one and let us know if I’m wrong. It may have even been in the 340s. It was not a 330 sw.
 
That’s cool. But even back then this racquet swing heavy. Go try one and let us know if I’m wrong. It may have even been in the 340s. It was not a 330 sw.
I couldnt remember, but I thought the unstrung SW on the old RPs was in the 330s meaning it would be 345-350ish strung. So, undoubtedly beefy.

But, I do think it's interesting that lower swingweights are becoming more popular even among the pros.
 

so the Defyer 98 is in. i wasnt able to get the 100 as well. will have to wait for that. i look forward to sharing thoughts after playing. but i wont do that until i play one of my regulars who can kick my ass up and down the court. either Chaz or Ike will fit the bill for that. first impressions. the grip shape. feels great. nice and oval. very sw friendly .. similar to the blade . not like the pro staff which feel like they have a more squared cap. so thats a great thing. im really picky about pallets and butt caps. thats all i can give for now. but so far so good.
 
Speaking of how far the pendulum has swung. Remember the Zeus epidemic here and how expensive those frames were? I just saw this listed in the sales forum:

Zus 100 x 3 w/Bag and 9 Sets of Grommets for $300 Total​

The Zeus era also aligned with the Wilson discount code era (RIP) and me ordering a million blade pros to measure and Ultra Tours going on sale for $99/each.
 
The old Prestige Mids are super stable even at 320 SW. I think it is because all the graphite is in such a small place. Those racquets just feel soooo solid, so one, I don't know how to put it, but it is special. Nothing you can find in modern racquets, which feel so spread out with the light weight and bigger headsizes and thicker beams.
Well, I might take out my antique PC600 for a spin as I do not own those new ones.

Edit: I think "dense" is a good word to decribe it. They feel super dense in graphite, and it is so hard when you are used to this. It just feels like a different quality level, even though it is probably just that all the graphite takes up less space. And they are definitely more "aero" than any modern aero racquet as they are 19mm and 89". Nothing even a modern prestige can mimick.
I second that! I played a couple more sets this morning and there was more joy to be had. I've got it strung with a full bed of Gosen OG syngut (18g), and the feel is just phenomenal. The downside is sure to reveal itself soon, but it remained in hiding once again - and I rolled to a fairly straightforward 3 and 3 victory, which is fairly typical for me against this guy.
 
Speaking of how far the pendulum has swung. Remember the Zeus epidemic here and how expensive those frames were? I just saw this listed in the sales forum:

Zus 100 x 3 w/Bag and 9 Sets of Grommets for $300 Total​

Glad I ended up missing that hype train. Sheesh.

The Zeus era also aligned with the Wilson discount code era (RIP) and me ordering a million blade pros to measure and Ultra Tours going on sale for $99/each.
Gotta pour one out for the Wilson discount codes.
 
Are they stored in a Tuff Shed? Wonder if you have more frames than your SO has pairs of shoes? Last comment is Have you ever gone back and used those frames in competition when your current sweethearts fail you?
 
Looks like my run with the asics x 2E is done. I love the look and cushion of this shoe but it’s hot here and my foot expands in it. And the painful reality is that it’s not wide enough once this happens. Pinkie toe was not happy by the end of a 3 hour matchplay session. Very bummed about this because I love asics shoes.

Just ordered some of the new babolat propulse storms in wide fit. Hoping for more stability and cushion than the SFX has. It’s what the marketing claims, so fingers crossed.

Still loving the Defython 98, and also have a 100 headed my way.
 
@SupremeCourt - I know you've been recently flirting with the D98, but among all of your journeying, how has the Volkl V8 Pro been fairing? Obviously, there's a severe lack of feedback on Volkl frames (due to their virtually non-existent market presence), so if you could offer a mini review on it, I'd be eternally grateful. Cheers!
 
Got a Prince Synergy 98 as in theory it has some cool specs, 18x18 string pattern etc.
Sadly a bit chunky, I'd assume it's around 340SW strung which I'm not quite used to anymore.
The linearly increasing tapered beam which maxes out at the top might play into that, can't say I'm the biggest fan.
String pattern is great, lots of spin, good for flattening out, would love to have this in other frames.
Feel of the frame is also average I'd say.

After trying that one on monday I've played with the Phantom o3 100 yesterday and this morning.
The comfy womfy Babolat origin/soft poly combo finally broke today, lasted a lot longer than I expected.
I'll have to try it with some other string setup, such a fun frame to play with. The thinnest beam on the market cuts through the air so well.

Hit some balls with the ATS95 once the Phantom's strings broke.
Amazing racquet, was cooked from the 40 degree at that point though and missed a lot.

So as a conclusion, I want to try a Speed tour, a defyer 98 and maybe I'll buy old dirt cheap Blade 98S (opinions on those?).
 
  • Like
Reactions: TBM
Got a Prince Synergy 98 as in theory it has some cool specs, 18x18 string pattern etc.
Sadly a bit chunky, I'd assume it's around 340SW strung which I'm not quite used to anymore.
The linearly increasing tapered beam which maxes out at the top might play into that, can't say I'm the biggest fan.
String pattern is great, lots of spin, good for flattening out, would love to have this in other frames.
Feel of the frame is also average I'd say.

After trying that one on monday I've played with the Phantom o3 100 yesterday and this morning.
The comfy womfy Babolat origin/soft poly combo finally broke today, lasted a lot longer than I expected.
I'll have to try it with some other string setup, such a fun frame to play with. The thinnest beam on the market cuts through the air so well.

Hit some balls with the ATS95 once the Phantom's strings broke.
Amazing racquet, was cooked from the 40 degree at that point though and missed a lot.

So as a conclusion, I want to try a Speed tour, a defyer 98 and maybe I'll buy old dirt cheap Blade 98S (opinions on those?).
I found it too cumbersome as well. However, my kick serve had some crazy spin on it. Not a bad frame but it has no wow factor.

The Beast 98 is better in every way.
 
I found it too cumbersome as well. However, my kick serve had some crazy spin on it. Not a bad frame but it has no wow factor.

The Beast 98 is better in every way.
Very different racquets though with the pattern beam etc. Sadly they don't seem to sell the o3 Beast 98 outside of Japan atm, would like to try that one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TBM
Very different racquets though with the pattern beam etc. Sadly they don't seem to sell the o3 Beast 98 outside of Japan atm, would like to try that one.
I've tried both the o3 and non-o3.

The o3 is more crisp and whippy, whilst the non-o3 is softer and more stable.

I couldn't say which one I preferred more, but the o3 is probably the easiest to use 98 I've tried. I felt like I couldn't miss, but maybe it's lacking some weight (easily fixed).

I only have a 2 point stringer, so opted to stick to the non-o3 as it's easier to string.
 
I've tried both the o3 and non-o3.

The o3 is more crisp and whippy, whilst the non-o3 is softer and more stable.

I couldn't say which one I preferred more, but the o3 is probably the easiest to use 98 I've tried. I felt like I couldn't miss, but maybe it's lacking some weight (easily fixed).

I only have a 2 point stringer, so opted to stick to the non-o3 as it's easier to string.
Sounds good.
Stringing is my main gripe with the o3 racquets as well.
I have a 6 point mount but a manual break where I have to tighten a screw everytime, don't mind it occassionally but if I mained an o3 stick I'd have to upgrade to a a fancier stringing machine.
You mean the newest Beast version right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TBM
Sounds good.
Stringing is my main gripe with the o3 racquets as well.
I have a 6 point mount but a manual break where I have to tighten a screw everytime, don't mind it occassionally but if I mained an o3 stick I'd have to upgrade to a a fancier stringing machine.
You mean the newest Beast version right?
Yeah the newest one
 
Awesome, would like to hear your impressions.
First impression is it's pretty similar to the EP 2024, a little more feel and precision, less power and forgiveness. I think it lacks some plow compared to the 2024 and can use more lead at 12 than my usual setup.

Edit: I feel like I need to mention the paintjob. It's a mostly inoffensive, some might even call it pretty (!) glossy lime green. Nice improvement over the previous version.
 
Last edited:

so the Defyer 98 is in. i wasnt able to get the 100 as well. will have to wait for that. i look forward to sharing thoughts after playing. but i wont do that until i play one of my regulars who can kick my ass up and down the court. either Chaz or Ike will fit the bill for that. first impressions. the grip shape. feels great. nice and oval. very sw friendly .. similar to the blade . not like the pro staff which feel like they have a more squared cap. so thats a great thing. im really picky about pallets and butt caps. thats all i can give for now. but so far so good.
So i wanted to update. i have had 2 outings with the p98.. its a really nice frame.. it does as advertised. the feel is nice.. doesnt feel cheap or hollow. launch angle is low but that is expected with most 98's but the dip on the ball is prominent so you can just rely on that to bring your forehands down if you are able to use spin effectively. i think its as good or better than the 23 aero. very very similar. even the grip shape mimics babs grip here. it doesnt have a wilson feeling grip to me. but its slightly narrower than the babs grip. nice grip. not complaining. very maneuverable. whippy. doesn everything well .. im gen not a 98 user.. but this is among the best of the 98's out there. i do love the dunlop fx 500. i dont know if i put them up against eachother which one i would prefer. but either way that is the biggest compliment i could give this frame. the fx and the 23 pa 98. not sure which one would win out. im guessing maybe the p98. its very nice. but again im not typ a 98 user. so i would need to get the 100 to see whats up. but yesterday after using the p98 for a while .. i went back to one of my go to 100. the ultra 100 with some added weight to the handle. and the confidence i get with that frame outshone the p98 right away. the ultra 100 is by the way a gem. prob the most underrated frame on the market. i can arc the ball on my forehand or serve at will and create depth or angles that i just cant with other frames. thats one of those frames that will give you that nadal esque feel on your fh if you hit with spin. anyway. so thats it for the p98. i would need to get the 100 to see if it can compare to my other 100's. but overall. wilson did a great job. (poor job on the name which is just juvenile, and the color which swings towards orange/red .. which i dislike. so damn wilson . you messed up the name and color). anyway. ill get the 100 demo at some point and report back.
 
Ever since the Tech Fire playtest I have been on court a lot this summer. My mains currently are modified blackout 285, up to about 305 unstrung b/c I wanted to add leather and some head weight. I'm with the v1 and have been for about 9 months.

I had a week with the defyer 100 and 98 both. The 98 felt anemic, and I know I can add lead and everything else but I'm not sure why I would bother. It needs probably 335 plus sw to have any real thump and I'm not playing that range. The 100 on the other hand was good. Better than the blade 100, did everything well but kind of a good all arounder. I liked it better than a Bab offering but perfer the solinco or head frames over it for sure. The hyper was fun, I am amazed at how many pythons sold on **** for 800+ dollars but at the end of the day I guarantee most of those people are convincing themselves it was a good purchase, b/c like most pro stocks it's not always a better frame.

The Red is super cool though, as a prestige 360+ fan I am on board with the paint.
 
Thats wild because I am playing the 98 stock and I cant imagine playing it at 335 SW. I dont even know what my SW is, but if its over 320 I'd be surprised, but I dont find it anemic. Big serving frame and really heavy off the ground. I like it a lot. Looking forward to trying the 100.

Its a shame I wont really know what the specs of my frames are for a while due to moving, but I know the weight for the 98 is 306 and the 100 I have incoming is a little under 300 grams. Kind of enjoying the blissful ignorance of it.
 
Thats wild because I am playing the 98 stock and I cant imagine playing it at 335 SW. I dont even know what my SW is, but if its over 320 I'd be surprised, but I dont find it anemic. Big serving frame and really heavy off the ground. I like it a lot. Looking forward to trying the 100.

Its a shame I wont really know what the specs of my frames are for a while due to moving, but I know the weight for the 98 is 306 and the 100 I have incoming is a little under 300 grams. Kind of enjoying the blissful ignorance of it.
Agreed - mine was 318 strung sw, and I felt it needed a little more and bumped it to 323 with lead at 10 and 2, but I might take a little out and put it at 12 for my next hit. Played with my 5.0+ head pro this morning and the frame had plenty of mass to keep up with him. Any more sw than that and I start to lose what makes the racquet special in terms of maneuverability and whippiness especially on kick/spin serves
 
Its a shame I wont really know what the specs of my frames are for a while due to moving, but I know the weight for the 98 is 306 and the 100 I have incoming is a little under 300 grams. Kind of enjoying the blissful ignorance of it.
Does anyone else in here purposefully not want to know the swing weight of their sticks? Static weight, balance, trial & error is all that I need. I have found going based of vibes and feels or empirical evidence is much more important. instead knowing the exact numerical measurement (that doesn’t help you win any points during a match)

My biggest gripe with SW is that every stick is built differently & comparing a blade and aero for example is truely comparable with apples and oranges. They are both still fruits but completely different.

It’s as if, every “tennis set up” is its own equation. Just because it worked for X, doesn’t necessarily mean it’ll work for Y.
(and that’s not even factoring in your own individual swing, along diametric differences with biological strengths & weaknesses, when comparing person A’s review to persons B’s experience…)
 
Last edited:
Does anyone else in here purposefully not want to know the swing weight of their sticks? Static weight, balance, trial & error is all that I need. I have found going based of vibes and feels or empirical evidence is much more important. instead knowing the exact numerical measurement (that doesn’t help you win any points during a match)

My biggest gripe with SW is that every stick is built differently & comparing a blade and aero for example is truely comparable with apples and oranges. They are both still fruits but completely different.

It’s as if, every “tennis set up” is its own equation. Just because it worked for X, doesn’t necessarily mean it’ll work for Y.
(and that’s not even factoring in your own individual swing, along diametric differences with biological strengths & weaknesses, when comparing person A’s review to persons B’s experience…)
I'm kinda the same. I go off feel for the most part based on what I know I like. Specs might create paralysis cause you might start second guessing everything.
 
Does anyone else in here purposefully not want to know the swing weight of their sticks? Static weight, balance, trial & error is all that I need. I have found going based of vibes and feels or empirical evidence is much more important. instead knowing the exact numerical measurement (that doesn’t help you win any points during a match)

My biggest gripe with SW is that every stick is built differently & comparing a blade and aero for example is truely comparable with apples and oranges. They are both still fruits but completely different.

It’s as if, every “tennis set up” is its own equation. Just because it worked for X, doesn’t necessarily mean it’ll work for Y.
(and that’s not even factoring in your own individual swing, along diametric differences with biological strengths & weaknesses, when comparing person A’s review to persons B’s experience…)
I love having access to it and I think it is pretty helpful for making two of the same frame that aren't perfect matches actually feel the same. That said, I think I could live without it. It's pretty easy to go by feel after a while, and ultimately, that matters more in the end than the numbers.
 
Nevermind. Today the Redline defied being defired and remains something of a defineher, because I’m still trying to. It’s still pretty damn great.

I don’t know anything anymore. Except that all balls made by Head should be euthanized and burned.

Tuesday.
No no. I was right. Redline flirting is over for me. Played last night, and I even won last night, but found myself too far away from the ball and what I like to feel. I've found that the drop off in feel for these frames is wild. Fresh beds, first hours, great. Just crisp enough. Once the string loses a bit freshness, it's like I'm hitting with a different frame, way more gummy and muted and a little springy. If you string yourself and can keep the beds fresh and crisp it can work but since I don't I want my beds to last a bit more even, longer. Feel, man. It gets me every time. Back to old Heads for me. The Defiler 100 is a serving wonder, but it isn't worth it for me.
 
Back
Top