Power Player
Bionic Poster
Power player switching racquets?! WTH!
I had to. I hurt my wrist biking so it was due.
Power player switching racquets?! WTH!
I had to. I hurt my wrist biking so it was due.
Oh I see. Nothing wrong with it, I just found it strange. Is the wrist healing up?
Woke up this morning with a feeling of nagging doubt and self-recrimination not experienced since my early twenties... you know, like, when your girlfriend would go away for the weekend with her folks?... ahem...
Oh Ross..I always knew a day like this would come for you. Admittedly, I think that you may be destined to forever be a racquet journeyman never really settling down with one.
I thought, when I saw that you had gone with the MGP mid, that you were finally going to have a bit of happiness and stability in your game. I know that I have found the joy of tennis with my YTP mids.
I don't think that the previous nod for you to try out the ASTGT would be a good frame. It requires more work for less results. I found the PST much more gratifying and easier to hit with.
Nonetheless, I am thoroughly enthralled with your racquet quest. I think that if you could get your hands on a few TGK 237.1 (IIRC, that the Prestige Mid but with a 16x19 pattern) you would be quite pleased and it would be the certain end to your racquet quest. Yes, I recall your gripes about the PM being too demanding but once you dedicate youself to it and find the groove, the shots you can produce are truly amazing.
BTW, should you decide to part with any of your lovely, flexy head frames (PT630, Rad TT, etc) or even that RD7 let me know. I may be interested.
As good as this felt, I had decisions to make. During the school year I live in a pretty small apartment, and my roommates would not be cool with racquet clutter all over the place. Some frames would have to stay behind. The lucky ones that got to come with me are: the newly acquired APDC and my two trusty KBT's, both of whom confront my numerous affairs with other racquets with an endearing nonchalant-ness.
Now all I have left to do is actually play some tennis! I can't wait to see what this school year has to offer. Provided I'm not too swamped by the increasing demands of classes, I'll make sure to keep all of you informed on the juicy details of every swing.
How do you find the APDC in comparison to the KBT? Im a KBT user as well, albeit a heavily modded one (replaced leather with synthetic grip+2 og's, 6 grams 7" up handle and 9 grams at 10 and 2). The racket hits a far heavier ball than the stock version, is much more stable on the defensive and is still very manueverable. The thing i love most about the KBT is that it really feels like a 'scalpel' when im playing, which i dont get from other frames. However, lately im getting out on court less and am curious as to whether id get any benefit from a more forgiving frame. Any insight you could give me into your experience of the two frames would really help. Thanks, Josh.
How do you find the APDC in comparison to the KBT? Im a KBT user as well, albeit a heavily modded one (replaced leather with synthetic grip+2 og's, 6 grams 7" up handle and 9 grams at 10 and 2). The racket hits a far heavier ball than the stock version, is much more stable on the defensive and is still very manueverable. The thing i love most about the KBT is that it really feels like a 'scalpel' when im playing, which i dont get from other frames. However, lately im getting out on court less and am curious as to whether id get any benefit from a more forgiving frame. Any insight you could give me into your experience of the two frames would really help. Thanks, Josh.
I have both of these racquets and yes I am starting to become an racketaholic .
The KBT is a lot more stable whereas the APDC is more manueverable. Slices are much easier with the APDC mainly due to a bigger head size and it is way too powerful for me as I have problems keeping the ball in the court. I am a flat ball hitter so perhaps the KBT is more suited for that.
Of course starting to become a racketaholic, these are not even my main frames I play with as I currently using several KPS 88s.
But now I am keeping my eye out for the Dunlop 4D 200 Tour and the Babolat Pure Storm Ltd GT.
PP, not to argue but I think you would love the YTPP. It's totally different to the YTMP and it's open pattern is very spin friendly. It has the overall feel and touch of the YTRP we all used to use but it swings lighter and is MUCH more accurate.
The YTPP plays a very modern game and is easy to swing and not at all tiring. I used it and the mgpp for 18 months or so and it's a great stick. In stock form especially, it hits a much bigger ball than the apd. You really should check it out.
How are the T fibre's treating you: the specs look awesome.
It's totally different to the YTMP and it's open pattern is very spin friendly. It has the overall feel and touch of the YTRP we all used to use but it swings lighter and is MUCH more accurate.
The YTPP plays a very modern game and is easy to swing and not at all tiring. I used it and the mgpp for 18 months or so and it's a great stick. In stock form especially, it hits a much bigger ball than the apd. You really should check it out.
I agree that the KBT is more suited to flat hitters, but I also think its slice is better than the APDC. Maybe that's just because it's so precise. For me at least, the thickness of the APDC's beam gets in the way of slicing effectively. I've never hit with the KPS 88, but the K90 is awfully similar, and I hit amazing backhand slices with that racquet. I just assumed it was because of the way that the thin, boxed beam cuts through the air. To each their own though; if you can hit good slices with the APDC, more power to ya!
Both the Dunlop 4D 200 Tour and the PSLGT are good choices for flat hitters. In addition, I'd recommend the BLX Pro Tour. I had a fun playtest with that frame. The strings are so dense at the sweet spot that if you make clean contact you can really whale away at the ball and still have control and keep the ball in the court. It's also headlight and maneuverable enough so swinging for the fences won't tear your arm up.
Happy hitting!
Hit,
Keep the posts coming. I had a very minor, brief 15 minutes the other day with the MGEP... wasn't bowled over tbh... big head was a distraction, it did seem stiff and it didn't have quite so much body or whatever behind it as the APD... lovely curling topspin however and I'd imagine it serves huge... reminded me a bit of the Rad Pro also... too early by far to say anything definitive though... I'll look at it again and post my thoughts... am looking forward to getting my freshly strung APD back in hand, and weighing up whether or not to take a look at my old PD+... my PSTGT+ experiences has given me renewed appreciation of the bnefits of plus-size racks, and especially on 2hbh and serve.
R.
Ryushen, I just put a lot of spin on the ball. I just hit with a teaching pro who said that it was very heavy an he loved it. Didn't really want to change anything except have me hit more open.
Thats all well and good for me, but it takes some serious energy, so the easier the stick for my style, the better. It took me a while to learn that lesson, but I have much respect for the feel and control of the Prestige line.
Just curious, how did you find the softness compared between the YTPP and your Tfibre? I demoed a Tfibre a long time ago and don't really recall the feel that well except that it was a touch stiff for my liking. I have a friend who is interested in demoing a few frames and likes the specs on a couple of the Tfibres but he is definitely more into softer frames.
My moneys on the prestige. If you are switching frequently between racquets 100si babolat is always going to feel like hollow *hit compared to a solid players stick.
The woofer is just wierd. You gotta give it time, feel out its springy wooferness, learn to trust it, give yourself over to its inherent screen door creakiness. You need to forget about the plush thump of players racquets and understand that you are exploring the nihilistic yet bloody effective domain of the tweener. Only then will it feel right and good.
The 320 is stiffer, but not bad. It felt a lot stiffer last year when my form was not as dialed in and I was arming the ball too much. Now it feels real comfortable. I hit it with a hybrid and did not like it the first day, but after that it started to feel real plush and nice, so that is always an option for a sore arm.
Interesting story from last night. Alright, it's interesting to me -- no one else may care. But I never claimed to be Dickens or Twain spinning tales of self discovery on our little tennis forum here.
I got a call late yesterday afternoon asking me to play in a USTA league Combo match last night because one of the guys scheduled to play had a family emergency. My shoulder and arm are still a little tender from the beating they took in three sets of singles Tuesday night swinging away with the YT Extreme Pro against a hard flat hitter. So I faced the dilemma of what racquet to use. I really didn't want to use the APDGT or the YT Extreme Pro because they both are on the stiff side and I didn't want to aggravate my shoulder or elbow any more. I picked up the YT Rad Pro and hitting in warm up I realized the big swing weight wasn't giving me that warm fuzzy feeling either as my shoulder seemed to balk a little bit.
So I pulled one of my trusty old (and long neglected) MG Radical OS racquets out of my bag and decided to give it a go. With 4g of lead tape under the bumper stretching from 11 to 1, they have a SW right around 330. With the overgrip and 5gs of lead inside the buttcap they come in with a static weight at 330g as well. The balance is right at 3 pts HL and most importantly, it is the softest most flexible frame I own. Strung up with a full bed of Turbotwist 1.18 this racquet has always been a counterpunching machine.
The light weight slightly polarized setup has always allowed me to do everything well. It doesn't hit the big heavy ball of the Rad Pro. It doesn't serve as big or volley as well as the Extreme Pro. It doesn't spin as big as the APDGT. But it is solid at everything and it gives me that big sweetspot and counterpunching power of an OS frame.
Much to the chagrin (ok maybe I am trying to be Dickens) of my opponents, I played one of the best matches I have in a while. The ball off my racquet was considerably flatter switching to the denser 18x19 pattern of the Rad OS. It was fast through the court because of the easy power of the OS head. Spin was good thanks to the full poly and the comfort to swing out on my shots. My serve was solid and, while not blowing anyone off the court with aces, it was very consistent with tons of spin and kick. With volleys, which I think is the weakest part of the racquet's game, the racquet gave me enough control that I could rely on placement over power.
Most importantly, the soft flex of the frame didn't bother my elbow at all and the light weight didn't bother my shoulder or leave me with the dead arm feel late in the match.
At the end of the match, I was sitting there thinking to myself "why in the world have I been trying all these other racquets when I have always played solid tennis with this one?" I am always trying to find that "Holy Grail" of a racquet, while I have a very solid all around stick sitting in my bag the whole time.
As I have switched from racquet to racquet, my overall game has probably taken a step backwards. Each racquet I tried would improve one part of my game to the deteriment of others. I would have to adjust my swing to compensate for all these different swing weights and static weights. The power of these different racquets would require me to adjust shot angles and timing. My serve has gotten very streaky based on what raquet I was using at the time. While a couple of my regular hitting partners have improved while staying with the same racquets by just working on their game.
Is this an epiphany? Are my days as a racquetaholic number? Probably not without professional help. But it does make me think a little more that I need to settle on one racquet and get back to working on my game.
By the way, does anyone have a Tflight 320 VO2 max I can borrow?
Interesting story from last night. Alright, it's interesting to me -- no one else may care. But I never claimed to be Dickens or Twain spinning tales of self discovery on our little tennis forum here.
I got a call late yesterday afternoon asking me to play in a USTA league Combo match last night because one of the guys scheduled to play had a family emergency. My shoulder and arm are still a little tender from the beating they took in three sets of singles Tuesday night swinging away with the YT Extreme Pro against a hard flat hitter. So I faced the dilemma of what racquet to use. I really didn't want to use the APDGT or the YT Extreme Pro because they both are on the stiff side and I didn't want to aggravate my shoulder or elbow any more. I picked up the YT Rad Pro and hitting in warm up I realized the big swing weight wasn't giving me that warm fuzzy feeling either as my shoulder seemed to balk a little bit.
So I pulled one of my trusty old (and long neglected) MG Radical OS racquets out of my bag and decided to give it a go. With 4g of lead tape under the bumper stretching from 11 to 1, they have a SW right around 330. With the overgrip and 5gs of lead inside the buttcap they come in with a static weight at 330g as well. The balance is right at 3 pts HL and most importantly, it is the softest most flexible frame I own. Strung up with a full bed of Turbotwist 1.18 this racquet has always been a counterpunching machine.
The light weight slightly polarized setup has always allowed me to do everything well. It doesn't hit the big heavy ball of the Rad Pro. It doesn't serve as big or volley as well as the Extreme Pro. It doesn't spin as big as the APDGT. But it is solid at everything and it gives me that big sweetspot and counterpunching power of an OS frame.
Much to the chagrin (ok maybe I am trying to be Dickens) of my opponents, I played one of the best matches I have in a while. The ball off my racquet was considerably flatter switching to the denser 18x19 pattern of the Rad OS. It was fast through the court because of the easy power of the OS head. Spin was good thanks to the full poly and the comfort to swing out on my shots. My serve was solid and, while not blowing anyone off the court with aces, it was very consistent with tons of spin and kick. With volleys, which I think is the weakest part of the racquet's game, the racquet gave me enough control that I could rely on placement over power.
Most importantly, the soft flex of the frame didn't bother my elbow at all and the light weight didn't bother my shoulder or leave me with the dead arm feel late in the match.
At the end of the match, I was sitting there thinking to myself "why in the world have I been trying all these other racquets when I have always played solid tennis with this one?" I am always trying to find that "Holy Grail" of a racquet, while I have a very solid all around stick sitting in my bag the whole time.
As I have switched from racquet to racquet, my overall game has probably taken a step backwards. Each racquet I tried would improve one part of my game to the deteriment of others. I would have to adjust my swing to compensate for all these different swing weights and static weights. The power of these different racquets would require me to adjust shot angles and timing. My serve has gotten very streaky based on what raquet I was using at the time. While a couple of my regular hitting partners have improved while staying with the same racquets by just working on their game.
Is this an epiphany? Are my days as a racquetaholic number? Probably not without professional help. But it does make me think a little more that I need to settle on one racquet and get back to working on my game.
By the way, does anyone have a Tflight 320 VO2 max I can borrow?
Did a side by side pt630 vs ytpp and y was too stiff for me and surprisingly had same amount or less spin than pt. Both were strung with typhoon at 55