Different GOAT rankings combined

[Lew II]

https://www.ultimatetennisstatistics.com/goatList

UTS has 6 different systems for measuring greatness, here explained:

• Default - Default UTS weights: all 'GOAT' Points categories are included with weight x 1
• GS, titles and No. 1 focus - Grand Slam tournament titles are emphasized with x 4 the default weight, other GS tournament points (F, SF, QF) x 2, other titles x 2 (resulting in 1 GS = 4 Masters, 1 title = 4 finals), Grand Slam achievement points x 4 and weeks at No. 1 points x 4
• Minimalist - Grand Slam titles and achievement points and weeks at No. 1 points are the only ones included
• Peak emphasis - Peak achievements (Career-High Ranking, Peak Elo Ratings, and Best Seasons) are emphasized x 4 the default weight
• Minimalist peak - Peak achievements (Career-High Ranking, Peak Elo Ratings and Best Seasons) are the only ones selected
• Era difficulty tweak - Big Wins points are emphasized x 4, Peak Elo Rating points x 2

I thought it could be interesting to combine the positions of players in each ranking. This is their average:

1) Federer 1, 1, 1, 1, 3, 1 (1.33)
2) Djokovic 2, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2 (2)
3) Nadal 3, 3, 2, 3, 5, 3 (3.17)
4) Lendl 4, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4 (4.67)
5) Borg 7, 7, 5, 6, 2, 7 (5.67)
6) Connors 5, 5, 7, 5, 8, 5 (5.83)
7) McEnroe 7, 8, 10, 7, 4, 6 (7)
8) Sampras 6, 6, 4, 8, 11, 8 (7.17)
9) Agassi 9, 9, 8, 9, 12, 9 (9.33)
10) Becker 10, 10, 13, 10, 10, 10 (10.5)
/ Laver 12, 11, 9, 11, 7, 13 (10.5)
12) Edberg 11, 12, 12, 12, 12, 11 (11.67)
13) Murray 13, 13, 19, 13, 8, 12 (13)
14) Wilander 15, 14, 11, 14, 12, 14 (13.33)
15) Rosewall 17, 17, 16, 17, 12, 17 (16)
16) Newcombe 19, 18, 14, 18, 12, 18 (16.5)
17) Nastase 16, 16, 24, 16, 12, 16 (16.67)
18) Vilas 14, 15, 17, 14, 30, 15 (17.5)
19) Courier 22, 19, 15, 22, 12, 21 (18.5)
20) Hewitt 20, 21, 21, 19, 12, 20 (18.67)

 

[Dan Lobb]

Where is Gonzales? Kramer?

 

[Lew II]

Where is Gonzales? Kramer?

Open Era only.

 

[Dan Lobb]

Open Era only.

They should do something about that.

 

[KINGROGER]

So, Federer GOAT?

 

[Deon Sanders]

So, Federer GOAT?

It was never in doubt

 

[Lew II]

So, Federer GOAT?

No LOL.

I just thought it was interesting.

 

[Eren]

Djokovic and Federer being close makes sense. Both dominated two surfaces (Djokovic to a lesser extent though) and both were extremely consistent on clay for years.

Borg at 5 disappoints me though. Thought he was better. Same goes for Sampras, he's only at 7.

 

[KINGROGER]

No LOL.

I just thought it was interesting.

But the stats say so, no?

 

[tudwell]

Nice objective stats.

 

[tennisfan2015]

There goes the big 4!

 

[True Fanerer]

Fedr?

 

[BeatlesFan]

You just knew the haters were gonna be out in force after Roger bagged 100 today!

https://twitter.com/x/status/1101880452644786176

 

[ghostofMecir]

No LOL.

I just thought it was interesting.

These stats are more inclusive of everything than all your other threads and point more heavily to Federer being the GOAT than all your other threads combined detract from him being the GOAT.

https://www.ultimatetennisstatistics.com/goatList

UTS has 6 different systems for measuring greatness, here explained:

• Default - Default UTS weights: all 'GOAT' Points categories are included with weight x 1
• GS, titles and No. 1 focus - Grand Slam tournament titles are emphasized with x 4 the default weight, other GS tournament points (F, SF, QF) x 2, other titles x 2 (resulting in 1 GS = 4 Masters, 1 title = 4 finals), Grand Slam achievement points x 4 and weeks at No. 1 points x 4
• Minimalist - Grand Slam titles and achievement points and weeks at No. 1 points are the only ones included
• Peak emphasis - Peak achievements (Career-High Ranking, Peak Elo Ratings, and Best Seasons) are emphasized x 4 the default weight
• Minimalist peak - Peak achievements (Career-High Ranking, Peak Elo Ratings and Best Seasons) are the only ones selected
• Era difficulty tweak - Big Wins points are emphasized x 4, Peak Elo Rating points x 2

I thought it could be interesting to combine the positions of players in each ranking. This is their average:

1) Federer 1, 1, 1, 1, 3, 1 (1.33)
2) Djokovic 2, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2 (2)
3) Nadal 3, 3, 2, 3, 5, 3 (3.17)
4) Lendl 4, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4 (4.67)
5) Borg 7, 7, 5, 6, 2, 7 (5.67)
6) Connors 5, 5, 7, 5, 8, 5 (5.83)
7) McEnroe 7, 8, 10, 7, 4, 6 (7)
8) Sampras 6, 6, 4, 8, 11, 8 (7.17)
9) Agassi 9, 9, 8, 9, 12, 9 (9.33)
10) Becker 10, 10, 13, 10, 10, 10 (10.5)
/ Laver 12, 11, 9, 11, 7, 13 (10.5)
12) Edberg 11, 12, 12, 12, 12, 11 (11.67)
13) Murray 13, 13, 19, 13, 8, 12 (13)
14) Wilander 15, 14, 11, 14, 12, 14 (13.33)
15) Rosewall 17, 17, 16, 17, 12, 17 (16)
16) Newcombe 19, 18, 14, 18, 12, 18 (16.5)
17) Nastase 16, 16, 24, 16, 12, 16 (16.67)
18) Vilas 14, 15, 17, 14, 30, 15 (17.5)
19) Courier 22, 19, 15, 22, 12, 21 (18.5)
20) Hewitt 20, 21, 21, 19, 12, 20 (18.67)

 

[Third Serve]

https://www.ultimatetennisstatistics.com/goatList

UTS has 6 different systems for measuring greatness, here explained:

• Default - Default UTS weights: all 'GOAT' Points categories are included with weight x 1
• GS, titles and No. 1 focus - Grand Slam tournament titles are emphasized with x 4 the default weight, other GS tournament points (F, SF, QF) x 2, other titles x 2 (resulting in 1 GS = 4 Masters, 1 title = 4 finals), Grand Slam achievement points x 4 and weeks at No. 1 points x 4
• Minimalist - Grand Slam titles and achievement points and weeks at No. 1 points are the only ones included
• Peak emphasis - Peak achievements (Career-High Ranking, Peak Elo Ratings, and Best Seasons) are emphasized x 4 the default weight
• Minimalist peak - Peak achievements (Career-High Ranking, Peak Elo Ratings and Best Seasons) are the only ones selected
• Era difficulty tweak - Big Wins points are emphasized x 4, Peak Elo Rating points x 2

I thought it could be interesting to combine the positions of players in each ranking. This is their average:

1) Federer 1, 1, 1, 1, 3, 1 (1.33)
2) Djokovic 2, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2 (2)
3) Nadal 3, 3, 2, 3, 5, 3 (3.17)
4) Lendl 4, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4 (4.67)
5) Borg 7, 7, 5, 6, 2, 7 (5.67)
6) Connors 5, 5, 7, 5, 8, 5 (5.83)
7) McEnroe 7, 8, 10, 7, 4, 6 (7)
8) Sampras 6, 6, 4, 8, 11, 8 (7.17)
9) Agassi 9, 9, 8, 9, 12, 9 (9.33)
10) Becker 10, 10, 13, 10, 10, 10 (10.5)
/ Laver 12, 11, 9, 11, 7, 13 (10.5)
12) Edberg 11, 12, 12, 12, 12, 11 (11.67)
13) Murray 13, 13, 19, 13, 8, 12 (13)
14) Wilander 15, 14, 11, 14, 12, 14 (13.33)
15) Rosewall 17, 17, 16, 17, 12, 17 (16)
16) Newcombe 19, 18, 14, 18, 12, 18 (16.5)
17) Nastase 16, 16, 24, 16, 12, 16 (16.67)
18) Vilas 14, 15, 17, 14, 30, 15 (17.5)
19) Courier 22, 19, 15, 22, 12, 21 (18.5)
20) Hewitt 20, 21, 21, 19, 12, 20 (18.67)

I wish there could be some way to adjust this for pre-Open Era achievements. Eh, well, nothing’s perfect.

But Lendl at #4???

 

[Lew II]

These stats are more inclusive of everything than all your other threads and point more heavily to Federer being the GOAT than all your other threads combined detract from him being the GOAT.

Nah, I prefer threads like this

https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/index.php?threads/highest-ranked-players-beat-to-win-a-slam.637271/

 

[Tennis_Hands]

Where is the Lewberries ranking system?