hey i just got sick of reading all these threads made by nadal fans about nadal is better than federer, or federer fan excuses for fed's loss, so i decided to write my own opinion which may hurt some people(nadal fans) but i think it's true. we all know nadal's best surface is clay and i think after sunday's final , he may and i think he will set a new record for most straight wins on clay, but i really think nadal should be worried instead of happy. Federer, playing in clay, was just 2 forehands from beating him in his best surface, where supposedly nadal should dominate him. Many people may say nadal was not playing his best tennis, but fed wasnt either. If you have seen fed play in the middle and end of 2004 and the beggining of 2005, you know he can play better than this. I think what was clear is that fed has got what it takes to beat nadal on clay and i have a feeling that if they mett in roland garros' fianl it would be fed the one who will walk out with the win. If you think it carefully, and we make the comparison of each one's best surface: - nadal doesnt have a chance of beating fed in grass - fed has made it clear with sunday's game that he CAN beat nadal in clay So i'm pretty sure that next year's clay season will be different your thoughts??