Standaa
G.O.A.T.
Check this out...
Nadal's incredible 2010 run included
Monte Carlo 2010
Rome 2010
Madrid 2010
Roland Garros 2010
Wimbledon 2010
US Open 2010
Do you know who ended his run at every single one of those big events?
fedr
Check this out...
Nadal's incredible 2010 run included
Monte Carlo 2010
Rome 2010
Madrid 2010
Roland Garros 2010
Wimbledon 2010
US Open 2010
Do you know who ended his run at every single one of those big events?
And it's not like we never heard about H2H stats when Nadal was doing better in that department than he is now...Tennis in general is pretty irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Nothing wrong with nerding out once in a while
Volleying? Neither Rafa or Djokovic utilize the shot much at all, but when they do, Nadal is clearly superior. Djokovic is clearly the worst volleyer and most reluctant volleyer among any ATG.Apart from his patented DjokoSmash, Djokovic trumps Nadal in virtually every stroke of the game.
And it's not like we never heard about H2H stats when Nadal was doing better in that department than he is now...
Djokovic pounding Nadal into submission on a hard court nowadays is like the sun rising from the east every day, it is just another normal day on planet Earth, hardly needs to be spoken about, I mean what's the big deal?
Unfiltered Hitty = the best Hitty.Djokovic pounding Nadal into submission on a hard court nowadays is like the sun rising from the east every day, it is just another normal day on planet Earth, hardly needs to be spoken about, I mean what's the big deal?
The change in style and strategy that led Djokovic to turn around this rivalry is amazing. Example to follow.
5 of his 7 wins were on clay.
Sigh. "Peak" Nadal of 2008 would be getting blasted out on hard courts. Is this revisionism or something? He had to change his game and tactics. He is far greater on hard courts post 2009. Nadal and reality back this up. Sigh. Sigh. Sigh.
Volleying? Neither Rafa or Djokovic utilize the shot much at all, but when they do, Nadal is clearly superior. Djokovic is clearly the worst volleyer and most reluctant volleyer among any ATG.
Djokovic started beating Nadal consistently in 2011, not yesterdayLol he didn't have to change. Nadal since he's lost his speed can't challenge him on HC anymore. Same w Fed.
4/6 on hc is a completely normal distribution.and 4 of Djokovic's 6 were on hard - point?
Excellent stuff.Nadal learned to be more consistent and efficient against the field but he never surpassed AO09/US10 level on HC again. What ultimately matters is what you can bring against the best, not the field. 2017-19 Nadal is a perfect example, as good as ever against the field, abysmal against the best competition.
People view this narrative as taking away from Nole, but actually it boosts him. Despite losing Madrid 09, by fighting Nadal so hard there he ensured that Nadal would never again reach those heights of movement/speed and rarely again be able to threaten him away from clay. Nadal had to injure himself to beat Nole, and then Nole himself improved his game to surpass Nadal a couple of years later.
The biggest thing that changed was Nadal's movement to the BH side, his BH went from being a strength in his 08-09 run to an exploitable weakness after Madrid 09.
Excellent stuff.
One thing too i refuse to be swayed that 2011 - 2012 was not peak hard court nadal. In fact indian wells miami uso and ao finals says he was at his damn best. Only one man stopped him. The hard court goat.
Excellent stuff.
One thing too i refuse to be swayed that 2011 - 2012 was not peak hard court nadal. In fact indian wells miami uso and ao finals says he was at his damn best. Only one man stopped him. The hard court goat.
4/6 on hc is a completely normal distribution.
Djokovic pounding Nadal into submission on a hard court nowadays is like the sun rising from the east every day, it is just another normal day on planet Earth, hardly needs to be spoken about, I mean what's the big deal?
Ohh.. That's great..New Kollywood movie DARBAR with Rajinikanth looks awesome!
Pretty much like Wawrinka beating Novak in a major.
Another stat trying to detract from Rafa's greatness that can't just stand alone. There always has to be a ''since <<insert favourable date here>>'' or ''off-clay'' (for some reason excluding the second most prolific surface on tour). Or some other caveat.
Absolutely, spot on, or like Nadal losing to Federer anywhere when he doesn't have dirt under his feet. After a little while, it's just the norm.
Wrong.
There's dirt on the courts at Wimbledon...
RG is actually crushed brick.
Keep reaching, but it's not the norm when it only really happened in 2017. Oh and Nadal still leads the outdoor HC h2h with Rogi too btw despite those 4 losses in 2017...
Still Nadal will retire with the better h2h record against Fed.
The only one reaching here is you. This topic is about Djokovic v Nadal, it hit a nerve with you, so you bring in another player Wawrinka into it, so I did too to see your reaction. And you responded how I thought you would.
Yeah sure, I'm reaching when you're isolating HC encounters...
How about yall stop being ridiculous and enjoy the AO lol. People's homes are on fire and kids are starving all over the world
The Rock's father Rocky Johnson passed away today. RIP. Man was a legend.
The older I get the more I realize life is just one gigantic live-action version of Final Destination. We all need to remember more often how short time is and to live better
Nadal is better than Djokovic not only on clay, but also at the US Open. Nadal has more US Open titles than Djokovic, Nadal has 4, Djokovic 3. And yes, Nadal leads Djokovic 9-6 in the H2H in Slams, but that it not an advantage gained exclusively from 1/4 Slams. Nadal also leads Djokovic 2-1 at the US Open.It does count. We all know Nadal is an infinitely better clay player than Djokovic and Federer, and beat them like a drum there going 12-1. However, there are 4 Slams not 1. If anyone can beat two guys like a drum at all 4 Slams when both have 15+ Slams then he is the supreme tennis player, most likely the undisputed GOAT and no one should argue otherwise. But when he dominated one of them mainly at one Slam but his fans keep repeating 9-6, it can become annoying and tiresome after a while especially when trying to prop up an advantage gained from being so dominant at 1/4 Slams.
Reminds me of a classic Rocky quote -
"The older I get, the more things I leave behind. That's life."
I wanna die in my sleep lol, literally every other way is gross :/
Will prob watch Rocky II this week
Easily the best training montage to me #Iconic
Lol, the US Open is only one tournament. You're not seriously suggesting that Nadal is a better hard court player than Djokovic, are you?Nadal is better than Djokovic not only on clay, but also at the US Open. Nadal has more US Open titles than Djokovic, Nadal has 4, Djokovic 3. And yes, Nadal leads Djokovic 9-6 in the H2H in Slams, but that it not an advantage gained exclusively from 1/4 Slams. Nadal also leads Djokovic 2-1 at the US Open.
No, I said specifically at the US Open and the Canadian Open.Lol, the US Open is only one tournament. You're not seriously suggesting that Nadal is a better hard court player than Djokovic, are you?
Lol, the US Open is only one tournament. You're not seriously suggesting that Nadal is a better hard court player than Djokovic, are you?
Which like I said is only one tournament. Other than the US Open and Canada, Djokovic has a superior record at every other big hard court event at Masters level and above.No, I said specifically at the US Open.
Which like I said is only one tournament. Other than the US Open and Canada, Djokovic has a superior record at every other big hard court event at Masters level and above.
There are 2 HC slams, Nadal has more titles than Djokovic at one of those That's all that matters you can throw rocks all day and reach but until Djokovic wins 3 more slams Nadal is considered greater.
Djokovic better on HC, grass.
Well some, including me, would argue slams aren't the be all and end all. Djokovic has won 40 hard court tournaments at Masters level and above compared to 15 for Nadal. That seems to paint a pretty accurate picture of who the better HC player is.There are 2 HC slams, Nadal has more titles than Djokovic at one of those That's all that matters you can throw rocks all day and reach but until Djokovic wins 3 more slams Nadal is considered greater.
Well some, including me, would argue slams aren't the be all and end all. Djokovic has won 40 hard court tournaments at Masters level and above compared to 15 for Nadal. That seems to paint a pretty accurate picture of who the better HC player is.
You're right. 10 >>>>> 5 it is then.
You could discuss it all you like, the tennis media will print the story one way and it'll be the correct one
If some 7 foot servebot had won 21 Wimbledons, you would be mocking any claims for that player to GOAThood. But whatever keeps you happy."You can throw rocks all day and reach but until Djokovic wins 3 more slams Nadal is considered greater. " (and Rafa isnt done) so keep throwing out trivial stats it doesn't change the truth
Nadal is better than Djokovic not only on clay, but also at the US Open. Nadal has more US Open titles than Djokovic, Nadal has 4, Djokovic 3. And yes, Nadal leads Djokovic 9-6 in the H2H in Slams, but that it not an advantage gained exclusively from 1/4 Slams. Nadal also leads Djokovic 2-1 at the US Open.
If some 7 foot servebot had won 21 Wimbledons, you would be mocking any claims for that player to GOAThood. But whatever keeps you happy.