Djokovic 2007/08 VS Djokovic 2021

maupp

Semi-Pro
People are forgetting that Djokovic dismantled Medvedev in the final of AO this year, a guy that was on a 20+ winning streak and had shown a very high level on hard court for 6 months leading to the final. Heck this place favored Med to win the AO final.

Djokovic this year has shown he can play at any required level when needed. A ball basher and inconsistent version of himself isn't going to beat this current Djokovic on the most important stages.
 

Kralingen

Bionic Poster
2021 Tsitsipas is greater than 2008 Djokovic on clay. Surprised you feel differently. He did start off slow in the Musetti match but was on fire in the last 3 sets.
Has a big FH and a bigger serve but I really think you’re underrating 08ovic here. He would have loved the 2nd set 21 Novak came out with in the final and likely taken that easily.

And crucially if you think any version of Djokovic, especially 2008 Djokovic coming off a Grand Slam, is going to fail to force a BP for 3 straight sets against anyone you’re crazy. He got into peak Nadal’s service games and broke him twice. I don’t think he’s going to beat 21 Djokovic due to lack of stamina but he would certainly have been a much tougher opponent than Tsitipas in the 3rd/4th sets.
 

Third Serve

Talk Tennis Guru
Has a big FH and a bigger serve but I really think you’re underrating 08ovic here. He would have loved the 2nd set 21 Novak came out with in the final and likely taken that easily.

And crucially if you think any version of Djokovic, especially 2008 Djokovic coming off a Grand Slam, is going to fail to force a BP for 3 straight sets against anyone you’re crazy. He got into peak Nadal’s service games and broke him twice. I don’t think he’s going to beat 21 Djokovic due to lack of stamina but he would certainly have been a much tougher opponent than Tsitipas in the 3rd/4th sets.
Yeah, 2008 Djokovic's much better return than Tsitsipas is the definitive tiebreaker between those two players for sure (a less definitive one would be Novak's more potent ground game).
 

daggerman

Hall of Fame
It's pretty simple to me: a fully-focused 2021 Djokovic is a comfortable (but not overwhelming) favorite over 2008 Djokovic at each of the first 3 slams. However, if old Djokovic isn't focused, young Djokovic would be able to capitalize on old Djokovic's lapses in a way that Tsitsipas/Shapovalov/etc. could not.

2007 Djokovic was too green. I wouldn't like his chances at all.
 

Kralingen

Bionic Poster
Yeah, 2008 Djokovic's much better return than Tsitsipas is the definitive tiebreaker between those two players for sure (a less definitive one would be Novak's more potent ground game).
Yeah, and I like 21 Tsitsipas too. This is more a compliment to younger Novak. I don’t like to do hypothetical match results at all but the match would definitely be very competitive, ‘21 Djokovic if he brings out Nadal form would win but not easily.

So weird to see Djokovic fans underrating Djokovic lol. If there’s any part of a player’s career that their own fanbase has a large tendency to underrate it’s weirdly young Djokovic. Guy was an established 3rd best player in the world in 2007-2009, regarded as some of the strongest years ever. I feel his young career came at the worst possible timing as he had both Peak Nadal and post-prime but still epic Federer. Of anyone he suffered the most from the strong era.

Would be a good comeback for Djokovic fans to use when he’s called a vulture but I never hear it.

Do we need to bring out Rogers Cup 2007 highlights?
 

Milehigh5280

Professional
Unless it's the 2008 AO version of Djokovic, I think the 2021 version wins thanks to his mental strength. Another factor I don't think I've seen mentioned here is 2021 Djokovic would use his knowledge of his younger self to his advantage to devise a game plan and tactics that would frustrate his younger self
 

NoleFam

Bionic Poster
Like he pummelled Musseti and Tsitsipas lol.

Mussetti did get pummeled. He won 1 game in the last 2 and half sets. You also think 2008 Djokovic is better than Tsitsipas on clay? I know you guys think this is a weak era but there is a limit to how far you can push that narrative. Lol
 

King No1e

G.O.A.T.
Tsitsipas is definitely better than 08 Djokovic. Tennis is constantly evolving and the guys hit much harder and move faster than they did 13 years ago.

federer_2k10_ao_102.jpg
 

NoleFam

Bionic Poster
lmao you know this pretty much equates to Musetti and Tsitsipas being better than young Novak at RG right? I don't buy that for a second.

As for the "ballbashing won't work against Nadal on clay" bit, we need to distinguish which Nadal you're talking about. No one is hitting through 2008 Nadal on clay, granted. But 2021 Nadal is much easier to hit through than that. He can't reach as many balls as he used to due to his declined movement and his defensive capabilities are very much pedestrian compared to what he used to be capable of. I'd say 2008 Novak could certainly hit through 2021 Nadal.

2021 Novak is a very slow starter now compared to his younger self. I think 2008 Novak would capitalize on that and race to an early lead. So I know for sure he's getting at least a set and most likely two, probably one of the first few. Then it's a battle of stamina from there on out, just like it was in the Tsitsipas final. A battle that 2021 probably wins in the end, but I just think it's crazy to say that 2021 Novak would "pummel" him when he didn't to far weaker opponents like even Berrettini lol

Of course Tsitsipas is better than 2008 Djokovic on clay. Who had Djokovic beaten by 2008 on clay? No one really. He won Rome because he didn't have to play Nadal to get it. He was 2-7 against the top 10 by 2008 RG. Tsitsipas is 8-10 and with a higher winning percentage, and it's Tsitsipas' best surface. Clay never was Djokovic's best surface.

If it was that easy to hit through Nadal, someone one would have done it in a BO5 before then. Instead he was undefeated from 2017-2021 in a BO5 on clay.

Djokovic was starting matches slow in 2008 Slams as well which isn't exclusive to 2021. I don't think 2008 Djokovic was great on clay and I watched his matches, and he was not a tactical master like he is now. He relied on instinct and hitting the ball hard, which is why he hadn't had much success yet so yea I stand by him getting beaten by his 2021 version.
 
Last edited:

NoleFam

Bionic Poster
Has a big FH and a bigger serve but I really think you’re underrating 08ovic here. He would have loved the 2nd set 21 Novak came out with in the final and likely taken that easily.

And crucially if you think any version of Djokovic, especially 2008 Djokovic coming off a Grand Slam, is going to fail to force a BP for 3 straight sets against anyone you’re crazy. He got into peak Nadal’s service games and broke him twice. I don’t think he’s going to beat 21 Djokovic due to lack of stamina but he would certainly have been a much tougher opponent than Tsitipas in the 3rd/4th sets.

Well Djokovic had a very slow start in the final and he was tired. I was thinking of Djokovic in the SF versus 2008 SF Djokovic, which is why I stand by him losing badly to that version of himself. Tsitsipas played a higher level in that final than anything Djokovic showed in the 2008 tournament. I think some of you need to go back and watch these matches.
 
Mussetti did get pummeled. He won 1 game in the last 2 and half sets. You also think 2008 Djokovic is better than Tsitsipas on clay? I know you guys think this is a weak era but there is a limit to how far you can push that narrative. Lol
Dude stop wasting your time. Lol Anything in the vicinity of 2004-07 is the best ever according to these guys. Everything today is the weakest ever. While they refuse to acknowledge some normal human process like evolution, progress, improvement. Clueless Fed fanatics.
 

NoleIsBoat

Hall of Fame
Yep, just check out how complete, versatile, and confident Roger was that tournament. He really was King back then.

The tour doesn't evolve that fast. Early prime Nole still beats current Nole.
Yes until Nole matured . He plays better now than the incomplete ball basher who retired from matches.
 

NoleFam

Bionic Poster
Dude stop wasting your time. Lol Anything in the vicinity of 2004-07 is the best ever according to these guys. Everything today is the weakest ever. While they refuse to acknowledge some normal human process like evolution, progress, improvement. Clueless Fed fanatics.

I'm just surprised people are dismissing Tsistipas' clay prowess to this extent considering the level he played this RG. 2 years in a row he pushed Djokovic to 5 and has some big wins already on the surface, plus he's already better at net than Djokovic was at that age.
 

Kralingen

Bionic Poster

Alright let’s be clear about who we’re talking about here. These are the best HD highlights I could find from 2007, not a Slam but I think it bears repeating that him making world #3 at age 20 was not at all a fluke.

Masters Nadal and Federer (in 07, two of their best years of all time) admittedly not at their best, but definitely still playing hard.. look at some of the shots he’s making (especially the FH vs Federer) and tell me that kid isn’t going to give 21 Djokovic a headache. He took down #3, 2 and 1 in the world and did so in style. Again this is what a young ATG talent actually looks like.
 
I'm just surprised people are dismissing Tsistipas' clay prowess to this extent considering the level he played this RG. 2 years in a row he pushed Djokovic to 5 and has some big wins already on the surface, plus he's already better at net than Djokovic was at that age.
They're not dismissing Tsitsipas per se. They are dismissing the whole current field. It's not about Djokovic and his tennis skills why he is with a shot of achieving a CYGS. No... It's just because of the pathetic mug field. Nothing else. 2007 Djokovic would have achieved a CYGS in 2021. Roddick, Hewitt would have as well. Ivo Minar, Spadea, Santoro you name it... Everyone with the pulse from 2004-07 era would have liked his chances today... Not to mention 2004-07 Fed. That guy would have achieved CYGS without loss of a set.
 
Last edited:

NoleFam

Bionic Poster

Alright let’s be clear about who we’re talking about here. These are the best HD highlights I could find from 2007, not a Slam but I think it bears repeating that him making world #3 at age 20 was not at all a fluke.

Masters Nadal and Federer (in 07, two of their best years of all time) admittedly not at their best, but definitely still playing hard.. look at some of the shots he’s making (especially the FH vs Federer) and tell me that kid isn’t going to give 21 Djokovic a headache. He took down #3, 2 and 1 in the world and did so in style. Again this is what a young ATG talent actually looks like.

This was an amazing run but it's hardcourt though, not clay. We all know young 20-21 Djokovic was a beast on hardcourt, and he had a great 2007 and 2008 on the surface.
 

NoleFam

Bionic Poster
They're not dismissing Tsitsipas per se. They are dismissing the whole current field. It's not about Djokovic and his tennis skills why he is with a shot of achieving a CYGS. No... It's just because of the pathetic mug field. Nothing else. 2007 Djokovic would have achieved a CYGS in 2021. Roddick, Hewitt would have as well. Ivo Minar, Spadea, Santoro you name it... Everyone with the pulse from 2004-07 era would have liked his chances today... Not to mention 2004-07 Fed. That guy would have achieved CYGS without lose of a set.

Yea it does seem like people are just dismissing the entire field instead of analyzing and breaking down the matches. No way would I ever agree with some of these opinions, sorry, and I wish people could give 2021 Djokovic his due instead of focusing so much on the "mug" field.
 

Alright let’s be clear about who we’re talking about here. These are the best HD highlights I could find from 2007, not a Slam but I think it bears repeating that him making world #3 at age 20 was not at all a fluke.

Masters Nadal and Federer (in 07, two of their best years of all time) admittedly not at their best, but definitely still playing hard.. look at some of the shots he’s making (especially the FH vs Federer) and tell me that kid isn’t going to give 21 Djokovic a headache. He took down #3, 2 and 1 in the world and did so in style. Again this is what a young ATG talent actually looks like.
Dude I follow Djokovic since 2004. No way 2007 Djokovic is troubling 2021 Djokovic. No effing way.
 

Kralingen

Bionic Poster
Dude I follow Djokovic since 2004. No way 2007 Djokovic is troubling 2021 Djokovic. No effing way.
This was an amazing run but it's hardcourt though, not clay. We all know young 20-21 Djokovic was a beast on hardcourt, and he had a great 2007 and 2008 on the surface.

Then why is it so hard to believe he would give 21 Djokovic a very difficult match? Looking at the components of what hurts Novak these days it's power from the baseline (check) and especially an ability to hit on the run (young Djokovic has this). 21 Djokovic also, no offense to the current gen, has not faced a returner on '07/08 Djokovic's level aside from Nadal and maybe Medvedev. Both of the two players would get into each other's service games regularly. 21 Djokovic consistently has a few mental walkabout service games per match: see how many were gifted to Berrettini and Tsitsipas even, I have much more confidence in 08ovic converting a BP. Plus, 07/08 Djokovic really does have more power than today's version and hits big - we saw Djokovic struggle heavily with Berrettini and Shapo's FHs at times, why is it a leap to say '07/08 Djokovic who was troubling peak Nadal couldn't do it? I have no doubt he could match '21 Djokovic in BH to BH rallies especially and his speed will allow him to stay in points.

This matchup is the most meaningless of hypotheticals as the two could never play, obviously. And I'm sure the fitness and experience advantage of 21 Djokovic would help him. But this is a player who took '07 Federer to the brink and beat '08 Federer. Surely we can realize that peak Nadal and Federer aren't pushovers, and regardless of the final match result, 07/08 Djokovic was a monster of a young player who could definitely punish a '21 Djokovic not playing his actual best.
 

Noleberic123

G.O.A.T.
Then why is it so hard to believe he would give 21 Djokovic a very difficult match? Looking at the components of what hurts Novak these days it's power from the baseline (check) and especially an ability to hit on the run (young Djokovic has this). 21 Djokovic also, no offense to the current gen, has not faced a returner on '07/08 Djokovic's level aside from Nadal and maybe Medvedev. Both of the two players would get into each other's service games regularly. 21 Djokovic consistently has a few mental walkabout service games per match: see how many were gifted to Berrettini and Tsitsipas even, I have much more confidence in 08ovic converting a BP. Plus, 07/08 Djokovic really does have more power than today's version and hits big - we saw Djokovic struggle heavily with Berrettini and Shapo's FHs at times, why is it a leap to say '07/08 Djokovic who was troubling peak Nadal couldn't do it? I have no doubt he could match '21 Djokovic in BH to BH rallies especially and his speed will allow him to stay in points.

This matchup is the most meaningless of hypotheticals as the two could never play, obviously. And I'm sure the fitness and experience advantage of 21 Djokovic would help him. But this is a player who took '07 Federer to the brink and beat '08 Federer. Surely we can realize that peak Nadal and Federer aren't pushovers, and regardless of the final match result, 07/08 Djokovic was a monster of a young player who could definitely punish a '21 Djokovic not playing his actual best.
Dude, you also agree that 2021 Djokovic is a better player than 2007/2008 Djokovic. I'm not sure what you're arguing anymore
 

NoleFam

Bionic Poster
Then why is it so hard to believe he would give 21 Djokovic a very difficult match? Looking at the components of what hurts Novak these days it's power from the baseline (check) and especially an ability to hit on the run (young Djokovic has this). 21 Djokovic also, no offense to the current gen, has not faced a returner on '07/08 Djokovic's level aside from Nadal and maybe Medvedev. Both of the two players would get into each other's service games regularly. 21 Djokovic consistently has a few mental walkabout service games per match: see how many were gifted to Berrettini and Tsitsipas even, I have much more confidence in 08ovic converting a BP. Plus, 07/08 Djokovic really does have more power than today's version and hits big - we saw Djokovic struggle heavily with Berrettini and Shapo's FHs at times, why is it a leap to say '07/08 Djokovic who was troubling peak Nadal couldn't do it? I have no doubt he could match '21 Djokovic in BH to BH rallies especially and his speed will allow him to stay in points.

This matchup is the most meaningless of hypotheticals as the two could never play, obviously. And I'm sure the fitness and experience advantage of 21 Djokovic would help him. But this is a player who took '07 Federer to the brink and beat '08 Federer. Surely we can realize that peak Nadal and Federer aren't pushovers, and regardless of the final match result, 07/08 Djokovic was a monster of a young player who could definitely punish a '21 Djokovic not playing his actual best.

For one thing, you are conflating two different surfaces when you start talking about matches on hardcourt versus those on clay. Djokovic on hardcourt during that time was a different player to the one he was on clay. You're also conflating two different tournaments when you talk about Shapo since that was Wimbledon. Djokovic played a different type of game at Wimbledon than he did at RG. He didn't play defensively like that at RG because he knew he stood no chance playing that way. He got away with it in that match against Shapo on grass because of the type of opponent he is who hits big and misses often.

The reason Djokovic 2021 would crush 2008 Djokovic is because of the 2008 clay forehand. Look at the SF match and look how short it's landing and how it's spinning up, sitting there giving Nadal plenty of time to wind up his forehand and crush it. 2021 Djokovic's forehand is way better and if he keeps getting short, loopy balls like that into his strike zone, he's going to make you pay. It wasn't until the 3rd set when 2008 Djokovic was on his way out of the tournament and down 2 breaks when he really opened up his shoulders and started going for broke on that forehand, cutting out all that useless loopiness and started flattening it out. He got much more success that way and got himself a set point. It wasn't sustainable though and he easily lost the tiebreak. So yea he might push Djokovic for a set really, and maybe he will take one, but 2021 Djokovic is going to lay the hammer down on him.
 
Last edited:

Noleberic123

G.O.A.T.
For one thing, you are conflating two different surfaces when you start talking about matches on hardcourt versus those on clay. Djokovic on hardcourt during that time was a different player to the one he was on clay. You're also conflating two different tournaments when you talk about Shapo since that was Wimbledon. Djokovic played a different type of game at Wimbledon than he did at RG. He didn't play defensively like that at RG because he knew he stood no chance playing that way. He got away with it in that match against Shapo on grass because of the type of opponent he is who hits big and misses often.

The reason Djokovic 2021 would crush 2008 Djokovic is because of the 2008 clay forehand. Look at the SF match and look how short it's landing and how it's spinning up, sitting there giving Nadal plenty of time to wind up his forehand and crush it. 2021 Djokovic's forehand is way better and if he keeps getting short balls like that spininng up into his strike zone, he's going to make you pay. It wasn't until the 3rd set when 2008 Djokovic was on his way out of the tournament and down 3-5 when he really opened up his shoulders and started going for broke on that forehand, cutting out all that useless spinning and starting flattening it out. He got much more success that way and got himself a set point. It wasn't sustainable though and he easily lost the tiebreak. So yea he might push Djokovic for a set really, and maybe he will take one, but 2021 Djokovic is going to lay the hammer down on him.
2021 Djokovic will be appreciated way more in 5-6 years. I used to remember a time when even 2011 was underrated on this forum, now 2011 is seen as a God on here.
 

King No1e

G.O.A.T.
I'm just surprised people are dismissing Tsistipas' clay prowess to this extent considering the level he played this RG. 2 years in a row he pushed Djokovic to 5 and has some big wins already on the surface, plus he's already better at net than Djokovic was at that age.
He's certainly good, but young Djokovic was still Djokovic.
 

King No1e

G.O.A.T.
If it was a discussion of hardcourt or even grass, I would say Djokovic without hesitation but I think Tsitsipas is now above where Djokovic was in 2008 on clay.
That is true, but not by much. Remember Djokovic won Rome and gave Nadal some trouble in Hamburg in one of Nadal's best ever clay seasons.

2008 Djokovic is so underrated by the kids these days. Then again, I'm sure nostalgia blinders play some role in my assessment too.
 
Djokovic hit his FH huge in 2007/2008 lol. I know you’re joking but if people don’t believe his groundstroke speed has declined a lot they’re wrong

I’ve watched a lot of matches of him playing Federer and Nadal in 07/08 and commentators remark on him being kind of a ballbasher. I believe the term used in 2007 was “too aggressive”, when you consider he was playing Federer it seems ridiculous, but was also a true statement.

I think you're right about the change, but I'm not sure you describe it entirely accurately. When you say that his groundstroke speed has "declined," I think you imply that he is incapable of hitting it as hard as he used to. That might be true to some extent, but part of it is also, as I think you imply in the second paragraph, that he has changed strategy and doesn't hit as hard as he can all that often anymore.
 

NoleFam

Bionic Poster
That is true, but not by much. Remember Djokovic won Rome and gave Nadal some trouble in Hamburg in one of Nadal's best ever clay seasons.

2008 Djokovic is so underrated by the kids these days. Then again, I'm sure nostalgia blinders play some role in my assessment too.

2008 Djokovic was damn good and he played some good clay matches that year, and the talent was apparent but to me he was further along on hardcourt and grass than clay during that time. I honestly think his 2007 Wimbledon run gets overlooked a lot.
 

King No1e

G.O.A.T.
2008 Djokovic was damn good and he played some good clay matches that year, and the talent was apparent but to me he was further along on hardcourt and grass than clay during that time. I honestly think his 2007 Wimbledon run gets overlooked a lot.
I think his 2007 Wimbledon run is overlooked because you can't find highlights of it anywhere. Especially his QF vs Baghdatis.

Come on, Wimbledon channel. There's no way you don't have that in your archives!
 

NoleFam

Bionic Poster
I think his 2007 Wimbledon run is overlooked because you can't find highlights of it anywhere.

Come on, Wimbledon channel. There's no way you don't have that in your archives!

Yea and it's a real bummer. I watched that Baghdatis match when it aired live. Let me tell you, it was lit. The shotmaking in that match was insane. That was before I was a hardcore Djokovic fan and I didn't know who I wanted to win. It was one of those matches where you hated it had to be a loser. I wish they would upload older matches like that.
 

Third Serve

Talk Tennis Guru
Of course Tsitsipas is better than 2008 Djokovic on clay. Who had Djokovic beaten by 2008 on clay? No one really. He won Rome because he didn't have to play Nadal to get it. He was 2-7 against the top 10 by 2008 RG. Tsitsipas is 8-10 and with a higher winning percentage, and it's Tsitsipas' best surface. Clay never was Djokovic's best surface.
Ok granted, you have a fair point on this one for the whole clay season. But I don’t think you’re giving 2008 Novak much credit here.

Monte-Carlo: I believe Novak was injured for this one (still made a respectable run to the semiswhile Tsitsipas breezed through the draw relatively cleanly (and actually quite impressively for a next gen player). Obviously Tsitsipas.

Madrid/Hamburg: Djokovic fairly easily. Tsitsipas bombed out early to Ruud while Djokovic pushed a solid Nadal pretty hard. It’s another underrated one and imo one of their best clay matches, certainly second best when it comes to Bo3.

Barcelona: 2008 skipped, this goes to Tsitsipas by default.

Lyon: 2008 did not play, Tsitsipas by default

Rome: I’d give this to Djokovic even if he kinda vultured the tournament with a lame draw only bested by his own 2020 title run. I’d say it’s a bit closer than Madrid, but Novak still takes the win here.

It’s fairly even for the whole clay season barring RG. I’d even give the edge to Djokovic a bit here. RG is where we really differ.

Also, the top 10 numbers you’ve pulled don’t seem to be right for clay. Did you take them from the whole seasons up to that point, including the hard court ones?

At any rate, here’s the top 10 records on clay heading into the French Open matches in question (the 200:

Djokovic: 0-2 (the losses were to Nadal and Federer)
Tsitsipas: 4-2 (the wins are against Medvedev, Zverev, Berrettini, and Rublev, losses were to Djokovic and Nadal)

Tsitsipas definitely favored here, but to be honest I’d imagine Djokovic beating all of those extra top ten players except for maybe Zverev (and still the jury’s out on that), so I don’t personally think that tells us an awful lot. Tsitsipas also lost to Ruud at Madrid who was out of the top 10 (though to his credit is a fine enough clay courter on a good day) while Djokovic was very steady throughout each clay tournament he played. So I don’t think the difference is as wide as those particular numbers state.

If it was that easy to hit through Nadal, someone one would have done it in a BO5 before then. Instead he was undefeated from 2017-2021 in a BO5 on clay.
Well the clay field has been absolutely dire for a long time now (2021 was the best in, what, five years?) so naturally, no such players have come up. It’s certainly not easy to hit through any Nadal on clay; it’s just a less titanic feat doing that to 2021 Nadal compared to 2008 Nadal, I hope that’s clear lol.

A Thiem type of opponent that Nadal has been feasting on over the past few years just simply isn’t going to cut it. I don’t think 2017 Nadal would be that vulnerable considering he had his own incredible artillery to counter that, but bring a Soderling or Mathieu (or Federer that one RG match vs. Nadal when he employed more of a go-for-broke tactic, I can’t remember whether that was 2005 or 2007) to 2018-2020 and it’d be a lot trickier for Nadal given his declined footspeed. And 2021 is a cut below those.

Djokovic was starting matches slow in 2008 Slams as well which isn't exclusive to 2021. I don't think 2008 Djokovic was great on clay and I watched his matches, and he was not a tactical master like he is now. He relied on instinct and hitting the ball hard, which is why he hadn't had much success yet so yea I stand by him getting beaten by his 2021 version.
Ok that’s fair, I think he’d eventually get beaten by 2021, but in four or five sets, not three lmao. Novak hit the ball pretty hard back in 2008, but I think he played a smarter match than you give him credit for. He’d toned the overwhelming power down a bit compared to the 2007 SF for example. I do think you’re right on 2008 Djokovic getting off to a slow start, but I don’t think he ever sunk to such lows as, say, 2021 almost getting bageled in the opening set against Nadal (after that decent opening game) or losing that second set against Tsitsipas the way he did. That’s the bit that convinces me he’d at least grab a set. I don’t see 2021 Djokovic getting through an attacking (if slightly erratic) powerhouse like 2008 Djokovic without having some kind of lapse early on.
 

btsjungkook

Professional
This generation is so bad and unmotivated even djoker in his “down years” would somehow. dominate. Not like he is now but he would still probably win 2 slams at least. Djoker is more mentally tough now but his physical game has declined
This. Had Novak won the CYGS in 2015, that would've looked more impressive as he still had peak Wawrinka and Murray to deal with. The fact that he's not even playing well currently but he is still on his way to possibly a CYGS + golden slam just tells you how weak these generation of players are.
 

NoleFam

Bionic Poster
Ok granted, you have a fair point on this one for the whole clay season. But I don’t think you’re giving 2008 Novak much credit here.

Monte-Carlo: I believe Novak was injured for this one (still made a respectable run to the semiswhile Tsitsipas breezed through the draw relatively cleanly (and actually quite impressively for a next gen player). Obviously Tsitsipas.

Madrid/Hamburg: Djokovic fairly easily. Tsitsipas bombed out early to Ruud while Djokovic pushed a solid Nadal pretty hard. It’s another underrated one and imo one of their best clay matches, certainly second best when it comes to Bo3.

Barcelona: 2008 skipped, this goes to Tsitsipas by default.

Lyon: 2008 did not play, Tsitsipas by default

Rome: I’d give this to Djokovic even if he kinda vultured the tournament with a lame draw only bested by his own 2020 title run. I’d say it’s a bit closer than Madrid, but Novak still takes the win here.

It’s fairly even for the whole clay season barring RG. I’d even give the edge to Djokovic a bit here. RG is where we really differ.

Also, the top 10 numbers you’ve pulled don’t seem to be right for clay. Did you take them from the whole seasons up to that point, including the hard court ones?

At any rate, here’s the top 10 records on clay heading into the French Open matches in question (the 200:

Djokovic: 0-2 (the losses were to Nadal and Federer)
Tsitsipas: 4-2 (the wins are against Medvedev, Zverev, Berrettini, and Rublev, losses were to Djokovic and Nadal)

Tsitsipas definitely favored here, but to be honest I’d imagine Djokovic beating all of those extra top ten players except for maybe Zverev (and still the jury’s out on that), so I don’t personally think that tells us an awful lot. Tsitsipas also lost to Ruud at Madrid who was out of the top 10 (though to his credit is a fine enough clay courter on a good day) while Djokovic was very steady throughout each clay tournament he played. So I don’t think the difference is as wide as those particular numbers state.


Well the clay field has been absolutely dire for a long time now (2021 was the best in, what, five years?) so naturally, no such players have come up. It’s certainly not easy to hit through any Nadal on clay; it’s just a less titanic feat doing that to 2021 Nadal compared to 2008 Nadal, I hope that’s clear lol.

A Thiem type of opponent that Nadal has been feasting on over the past few years just simply isn’t going to cut it. I don’t think 2017 Nadal would be that vulnerable considering he had his own incredible artillery to counter that, but bring a Soderling or Mathieu (or Federer that one RG match vs. Nadal when he employed more of a go-for-broke tactic, I can’t remember whether that was 2005 or 2007) to 2018-2020 and it’d be a lot trickier for Nadal given his declined footspeed. And 2021 is a cut below those.


Ok that’s fair, I think he’d eventually get beaten by 2021, but in four or five sets, not three lmao. Novak hit the ball pretty hard back in 2008, but I think he played a smarter match than you give him credit for. He’d toned the overwhelming power down a bit compared to the 2007 SF for example. I do think you’re right on 2008 Djokovic getting off to a slow start, but I don’t think he ever sunk to such lows as, say, 2021 almost getting bageled in the opening set against Nadal (after that decent opening game) or losing that second set against Tsitsipas the way he did. That’s the bit that convinces me he’d at least grab a set. I don’t see 2021 Djokovic getting through an attacking (if slightly erratic) powerhouse like 2008 Djokovic without having some kind of lapse early on.


Tsitsipas was 16-3 heading into 2021 RG and Djokovic 2008 was 11-2. The top 10 numbers are Tsistipas' record against them on clay up to this point in time (8-10), versus Djokovic against them up to 2008 RG (2-7). Based on their overall record and record against top players that year, I have to go with Tsistipas here, plus I feel like he played a higher level at RG.

I agree with you about the clay season being dire for a number of years, with no new good talents really emerging for years until this past RG, but 2008 was a pretty weak clay field as well. It gets overlooked because of Nadal and how good he was. Djokovic was able to make the SF or better at all big clay tournaments that year without beating one top 10 player.

I honestly think you're overrating 2008 Djokovic in that SF match. He honestly wasn't hitting the ball super hard in that match and honestly his forehand was landing too short, which is why Nadal was all over him. He was down 6-4 6-2 3-0 (2 breaks) before he started being more aggressive with his forehand and got into that set. I don't think that qualifies as a smart match, at least not up until that point. His loopy forehand that day got him into all kinds of trouble. It was after that he started hitting it more aggressively that he got close to winning that 3rd set. I still stand by him losing rather easily to his 2021 version who just has a better forehand and a much higher tennis IQ to use against him.
 
Top