Young enough to reach 2 finals and 1 semi, and win 3 slams two years after.It took Djokovic until Federer was old af![]()
The state of the next generation in a nutshell.Young enough to reach 2 finals and 1 semi, and win 3 slams two years after.
Strong field, no?Young enough to reach 2 finals and 1 semi, and win 3 slams two years after.
This shows that Nadal has the highest specific surface peak.Nadal beat Djokovic in same slam for three consecutive years. FO 2012,2013 and 2014.
Djokovic never did so to any of Nadal or Federer.
It means that Djokovic's form was not as good as 2015-16 Federer's.Novak didn’t show up to play prime Federer 3 times in a row. AO 09, RG 09, Wimbledon 09 losing the round before a potential meeting I think.
It means Djokovic at the age of 22 was poorer than Federer at 35..It means that Djokovic's form was not as good as 2015-16 Federer's.
This shows that Nadal can dominate Djokovic on one surface at least but Djokovic can't do that on any surface.This shows that Nadal has the highest specific surface peak.
My stat shows that Djokovic has the highest all-around peak.
If you have the highest specific surface peak, you have the highest peak.This shows that Nadal has the highest specific surface peak.
My stat shows that Djokovic has the highest all-around peak.
Surely Fed lost many times to denies Novak chance to do it. If I'm not wrong, Fed lost to Wawa in 2015 FO, so Novak couldn't beat him in 4 consecutive slams (he did it on next 3 slams)...Novak didn’t show up to play prime Federer 3 times in a row. AO 09, RG 09, Wimbledon 09 losing the round before a potential meeting I think.
Instead, the beast was unleashed upon Djokovicz.Surely Fed lost many times to denies Novak chance to do it. If I'm not wrong, Fed lost to Wawa in 2015 FO, so Novak couldn't beat him in 4 consecutive slams (he did it on next 3 slams)...
You Fed fans use woulda shoulda too often...
It's an interpretation.If you have the highest specific surface peak, you have the highest peak.
Think about it. Djokovic never reached the same level than Nadal on clay on any surface.
Djokovic on hard = not as good as Nadal on clay.
Djokovic on grass = not as good as Nadal on clay.
Djokovic on clay = not as good as Nadal on clay.
It follows that Nadal on clay has the highest peak level ever.
Agree...Instead, the beast was unleashed upon Djokovicz.
If you have the highest specific surface peak, you have the highest peak.
Think about it. Djokovic never reached the same level than Nadal on clay on any surface.
Djokovic on hard = not as good as Nadal on clay.
Djokovic on grass = not as good as Nadal on clay.
Djokovic on clay = not as good as Nadal on clay.
It follows that Nadal on clay has the highest peak level ever.
Istomin and Chung beast... lol.Agree...
First, usually some beast is necessary to hold Novak...
Secondly, for mote than 7 years Fed need some beast to do his job for his vulturing purposes, because he is hopeless himself... real goat he is...
Yeah, Fed haven't win against Nole in slam, for about half of his career... Another great fact for one goat...
Obviously bigger beasts than goat himself isIstomin and Chung beast... lol.
They play a disproportionate amount on clay. More than should happen.Nadal v Djokovic on clay
16-7
Djokovic v Nadal on hard
19-7
What does this mean?
ThisHere we go again..
Where was this guy Djokovic from 2008-2010?
2008 WIM - Very consistent Safin humiliated Djokovic
2008 USO - Fed wins
2009 AO - Djoko lost to mighty Roddick to avoid Fed
2009 RG - Kohlschreiber beat Djoker
2009 WIM - Haas destroyed him, again Djoker didn't face Fed
2009 USO - tweener, enough said.
2010 AO - Muhammed Ali stopped Djoker
7 straights wins for Fed, if Djokovic face Fed with dignity like Fed always do 2011-2019.
They play a disproportionate amount on clay. More than should happen.![]()
Nobody has ever described Safin that way.Here we go again..
Where was this guy Djokovic from 2008-2010?
2008 WIM - Very consistent Safin humiliated Djokovic
2008 USO - Fed wins
2009 AO - Djoko lost to mighty Roddick to avoid Fed
2009 RG - Kohlschreiber beat Djoker
2009 WIM - Haas destroyed him, again Djoker didn't face Fed
2009 USO - tweener, enough said.
2010 AO - Muhammed Ali stopped Djoker
7 straights wins for Fed, if Djokovic face Fed with dignity like Fed always do 2011-2019.
Federer has 20 Slams.
He won 5 in a row against Djokovic.. RG 2006, 2007, Wimbledon 2007, RG 2008, USO 2010.Nadal has won 4 Grand Slam matches in a row against Djokovic (RG 2012, RG 2013, USO 2013, RG 2014). Novak Djokovic never won 4 consecutive Slam matches against Nadal.
Nadal also won 6 consecutive Slam matches in a row against Federer (RG 2008, WB 2008, AO 2009, RG 2011, AO 2012, AO 2014). Djokovic never won 6 consecutive Slam matches against Federer.
Don't hold your breath.So what? He's 6 years older. Novak will surpass Fed's major tally if he can avoid a serious injury.
Five Slams is asking for a lot.So what? He's 6 years older. Novak will surpass Fed's major tally if he can avoid a serious injury.
Don't hold your breath.
Five Slams is asking for a lot.
If I had to choose yeah I don't think Djokovic is gonna win 5 more Slams assuming Fed wins nothing more. That's basically another three 2 Slam seasons when he's got one more Slam to play before his 33rd birthday.Would you bet money Novak won't surpass him ? Literally the only caveat here is his health otherwise it's a foregone conclusion. Novak is going to retire with better achievemnts than Roger whether us Fed fans like it or not.
Because winning five Slams is extremely difficult, especially as Djokovic ages more. Even this year you can tell he's a few notches down from his best (and even a tad worse than the second half of last year).How do you figure?
It means that Djokovic's form was not as good as 2015-16 Federer's.
Technically he played him four times in 2007. Still went down 3-1 but he played him nonetheless.Yeah true. Still, Djokovic never played prime Fed 3 times in a row so he never had the chance to do this.
If I had to choose yeah I don't think Djokovic is gonna win 5 more Slams assuming Fed wins nothing more. That's basically another three 2 Slam seasons when he's got one more Slam to play before his 33rd birthday.
Nadal beat Djokovic in same slam for three consecutive years. FO 2012,2013 and 2014.
Djokovic never did so to any of Nadal or Federer.
Because winning five Slams is extremely difficult, especially as Djokovic ages more. Even this year you can tell he's a few notches down from his best (and even a tad worse than the second half of last year).
True. We have the next gen to blame for that.Not buying it until I see someone who can stop him with any kind of regularity in slams or he picks up a serious injury.
A lot of things Novak has achieved have been extremely difficult, so we can't start comparing his potential to lesser players.
Soon to be surpassed by his master, then after a respite, his other master.Federer has 20 Slams.